QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Thu 5th November 2009, 3:10pm)
The other great thing about the Duggan saga is that SV has spammed it all over the LaRouche series of articles, including
Lyndon LaRouche (T-H-L-K-D),
Schiller Institute (T-H-L-K-D),
LaRouche movement (T-H-L-K-D), and
Worldwide LaRouche Youth Movement‎ (T-H-L-K-D). Meanwhile, she and Will engaged in an edit war to remove a section on the campaign platforms of LaRouche's presidential campaigns from [[Lyndon LaRouche]], arguing that the information was already in
Views of Lyndon LaRouche (T-H-L-K-D) and we don't want the same information appearing in multiple articles.
Well, since she began and wrote a lot of the article on Duggan in Nov., 2004, she naturally wants to see it all over.
Here, for example, is her version of a non-biased article, written entirely by her except for some formatting:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...8&oldid=7417000Don't forget to put in details of LaRouche's prison sentence! She added them. That should go right here in the article on Duggan. For obvious reasons. (IMG:
smilys0b23ax56/default/hmmm.gif)
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...9&oldid=7441765You see, she's a non-involved, unbiased editor. Not like YOU, Herschel. You groupie, you. YOU can't be trusted with this stuff. But Slim has no opinion on LaRouche. She just being encyclopedic. As you see above. (IMG:
smilys0b23ax56/default/yecch.gif)