| |
|
  |
SlimVirgin's new presentation on "Cyberstalking", ...does she mean "her" cyberstalking or other cyberstalking? |
|
|
| alienus |
Thu 6th September 2007, 2:46am
|
Member
  
Group: Contributors
Posts: 229
Joined: Wed 26th Apr 2006, 3:33am
Member No.: 152
WP user page -
talk
check -
contribs

|
QUOTE(Daniel Brandt @ Tue 4th September 2007, 8:14pm)  I assume it's all a trick. She plans to make it all up. No research required — just a rich role-playing fantasy world and a generous dash of righteous indignation.
Ok, that part's self-evident. What's not clear to me is the intended goal. Is she going to try to claim that new policies are needed to protect admin anonymity? On a side note, I wonder how she might make a distinction between the standard sockpuppet witch hunt and cyberstalking. Al
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Somey |
Thu 6th September 2007, 5:09am
|

Can't actually moderate
        
Group: Moderators
Posts: 11,814
Joined: Sat 17th Jun 2006, 7:47pm
From: Dreamland
Member No.: 275

|
QUOTE(blissyu2 @ Wed 5th September 2007, 9:56pm)  Ordinarily, I'd say that the goal was obvious - to hide what she herself has been doing for so long. However, with SlimVirgin she tends to like to play 2 cards at once, so there may be something more to it than that. Hmmm... I don't think so, not this time anyway. Frankly, if this is the best she can come up with, then I think she's out of ideas. I mean, anyone who would believe the claim that she was the target of identity exposure "just for being a Wikipedia admin" has to be completely retarded. Uhh, how many admins are there? Almost 1,300...? And how many have been "investigated" in that sense? Ten? Twenty, tops?
|
|
|
|
|
|
| blissyu2 |
Thu 6th September 2007, 6:12am
|

the wookie
        
Group: On Vacation
Posts: 4,596
Joined: Mon 27th Feb 2006, 12:14am
From: Australia
Member No.: 5
WP user page -
talk
check -
contribs

|
QUOTE(Somey @ Thu 6th September 2007, 3:39pm)  QUOTE(blissyu2 @ Wed 5th September 2007, 9:56pm)  Ordinarily, I'd say that the goal was obvious - to hide what she herself has been doing for so long. However, with SlimVirgin she tends to like to play 2 cards at once, so there may be something more to it than that. Hmmm... I don't think so, not this time anyway. Frankly, if this is the best she can come up with, then I think she's out of ideas. I mean, anyone who would believe the claim that she was the target of identity exposure "just for being a Wikipedia admin" has to be completely retarded. Uhh, how many admins are there? Almost 1,300...? And how many have been "investigated" in that sense? Ten? Twenty, tops? It doesn't matter if they are an admin or not, doing what she's done would get you investigated. And if you think that you're MORE VULNERABLE because you hold a position of power somewhere, well, that's a big fat load of bullshit. You're a hell of a lot safer if you hold a position of power.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| jdrand |
Mon 10th September 2007, 8:22am
|

And Ye Shall Know Us by the Trail of Cheez-Whiz
  
Group: You Don't Want to Know
Posts: 172
Joined: Tue 31st Jul 2007, 3:12am
Member No.: 2,147

|
QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Wed 5th September 2007, 8:02am)  My hunch is that Virginia Slim is launching an offensive here to deflect the well-earned scrutiny of her behavior which followed the Ohmynews scandal and the revelations about her sock-puppetry. She is skilled at putting together fallacy of composition arguments, along the lines of this:
1. Many people say that they have experienced great psychic pain because they have been cyberstalked. This is especially true when they are admins. It is even more especially true when they are female admins. Nota bene: I am a female admin.
2. The recent exposés of my sockpuppetry, my previous shady activities as a putative journalist, and my general exploitation of Wikipedia for dubious purposes, were the work of cyberstalkers, who, it is said, cause great psychic pain to many people, especially admins, especially female admins, etc., etc.
3. Therefore, these recent exposés of my misconduct should be ignored, despite the fact that I am guilty as sin, so as not to give aid and comfort to the cyberstalkers.
She says this: The recent exposés of my sockpuppetry, my previous shady activities as a putative journalist, and my general exploitation of Wikipedia for dubious purposes, were the work of cyberstalkers, who, it is said, cause great psychic pain to many people, especially admins, especially female admins, etc., etc.BUT she admits those are true, and the "cyberstalkers" are actually telling the truth: QUOTE " ...despite the fact that I am guilty as sin... . Another H Y P O C R I T E.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Herschelkrustofsky |
Mon 10th September 2007, 2:29pm
|
Member
        
Group: Members
Posts: 5,199
Joined: Tue 18th Apr 2006, 12:05pm
From: Kalifornia
Member No.: 130
WP user page -
talk
check -
contribs

|
QUOTE(jdrand @ Mon 10th September 2007, 1:22am)  QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Wed 5th September 2007, 8:02am)  My hunch is that Virginia Slim is launching an offensive here to deflect the well-earned scrutiny of her behavior which followed the Ohmynews scandal and the revelations about her sock-puppetry. She is skilled at putting together fallacy of composition arguments, along the lines of this:
1. Many people say that they have experienced great psychic pain because they have been cyberstalked. This is especially true when they are admins. It is even more especially true when they are female admins. Nota bene: I am a female admin.
2. The recent exposés of my sockpuppetry, my previous shady activities as a putative journalist, and my general exploitation of Wikipedia for dubious purposes, were the work of cyberstalkers, who, it is said, cause great psychic pain to many people, especially admins, especially female admins, etc., etc.
3. Therefore, these recent exposés of my misconduct should be ignored, despite the fact that I am guilty as sin, so as not to give aid and comfort to the cyberstalkers.
She says this: The recent exposés of my sockpuppetry, my previous shady activities as a putative journalist, and my general exploitation of Wikipedia for dubious purposes, were the work of cyberstalkers, who, it is said, cause great psychic pain to many people, especially admins, especially female admins, etc., etc.BUT she admits those are true, and the "cyberstalkers" are actually telling the truth: QUOTE " ...despite the fact that I am guilty as sin... . Another H Y P O C R I T E. Please note that those are not quotes from SlimVirgin. They are from a parody of SlimVirgin.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Jonny Cache |
Thu 13th September 2007, 1:06am
|

τα δε μοι παθήματα μαθήματα γέγονε
        
Group: Contributors
Posts: 5,100
Joined: Sat 9th Sep 2006, 1:52am
Member No.: 398
WP user page -
talk
check -
contribs

|
QUOTE(GlassBeadGame @ Wed 12th September 2007, 8:51pm)  QUOTE(anthony @ Wed 12th September 2007, 6:40pm)  In case you didn't catch it, we just found out what this "paper" was all about. She was looking for help in her top-secret pseudo-arbitration session. "The group who discussed this included the arbitration committee, the staff of Foundation, and SlimVirgin and others who have from time to time been victims of harassment or stalking." Source. wikien-l/2007-September/080982.htmlA new low in convoluted and distorted process. A phony Brandeis Brief to inform a phony court. Damn !And here I was hoping past hope that SlimVirgin was preparing some kind of class-action suit — you know, sung and danced to the tune of Helen Reddy's, "A Thousand Yoo-Hoos and Me Against the World" — 'cause once a few early adopter lawyers found out there's gold in them thar hells, it would spawn a whole new breed of Wikipedic disambigulance-chasers. Jonny This post has been edited by Jonny Cache: Thu 13th September 2007, 1:22am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
  |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| |