Since the old motto has become a tired and embarrassing joke, there was http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jimbo_Wales&oldid=339939251#New_Mottothat better reflects the true nature of WP. The discussion was closed before it even really got off the ground. Which is a pity because Wikiland really does need a new motto.
My suggestion, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Matt_Lewis, would be:
Written by the unwell, read by the unwise.
Any other suggestions?
Posted by: Jon Awbrey
Wikipedia — the first draft of pistory …
Jon
Posted by: gomi
Wikipedia: almost but not entirely unlike an encyclopedia
Wikipedia: all the same letters and numbers, but without the cumbersome scholarship
Wikipedia: Jimbo's big bag o' slander, typos, lies, and trivia!
Posted by: A Horse With No Name
Wikipedia: It's like Alice in Wonderland, but not as entertaining.
Posted by: Peter Damian
Where is Victim of Censorship when you need him? How about
WIKEPEIDA: shit pile of filth
WIKEPEIDA: evil, despicable Shitfarm, an offense to Human dignity, respect and knowledge
Posted by: WikiWatch
"Wikipedia. The Choice of a Used Generation."
Posted by: Rhindle
I can't believe it's an encyclopedia!
Posted by: EricBarbour
QUOTE(Rhindle @ Mon 25th January 2010, 10:20pm)
I can't believe it's an encyclopedia!
** WINNER **
You have just won.....A KICK IN THE FACE FROM A BLONDE MIDGET! CONGRATULATIONS!
Posted by: Rhindle
QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Mon 25th January 2010, 10:18pm)
QUOTE(Rhindle @ Mon 25th January 2010, 10:20pm)
I can't believe it's an encyclopedia!
** WINNER **
You have just won.....A KICK IN THE FACE FROM A BLONDE MIDGET! CONGRATULATIONS!
Thanks! That would have to be one agile midget though.
Posted by: victim of censorship
QUOTE(Peter Damian @ Mon 25th January 2010, 8:46pm)
Where is Victim of Censorship when you need him? How about
WIKEPEIDA: shit pile of filth
WIKEPEIDA: evil, despicable Shitfarm, an offense to Human dignity, respect and knowledge
WIKEPEIDA: Cesspool of Lies and Jimbo's house of hate.
Posted by: Kwork
To paraphrase an old bumper sticker from the Southern U.S.:
If Your Heart Ain't In Wiki Get Your Ass Out.
Posted by: Milton Roe
QUOTE(RDH(Ghost In The Machine) @ Mon 25th January 2010, 10:48am)
Since the old motto has become a tired and embarrassing joke, there was http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jimbo_Wales&oldid=339939251#New_Mottothat better reflects the true nature of WP. The discussion was closed before it even really got off the ground. Which is a pity because Wikiland really does need a new motto.
My suggestion, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Matt_Lewis, would be:
Written by the unwell, read by the unwise.
Any other suggestions?
Wikipedia: Where else can you find encyclopia articles on quantum mechanics and relativity that anyone can edit?
Posted by: RDH(Ghost In The Machine)
Exxxcelent! Keep the ideas a coming crew, then we can have a poll to pick our new official, unofficial Wikimotto!
Posted by: CharlotteWebb
QUOTE(Peter Damian @ Mon 25th January 2010, 8:46pm)
Where is Victim of Censorship when you need him? How about
WIKEPEIDA: shit pile of filth
WIKEPEIDA: evil, despicable Shitfarm, an offense to Human dignity, respect and knowledge
Rhindle did a mighty good Joe-job in http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?act=findpost&pid=214172.
Posted by: RDH(Ghost In The Machine)
QUOTE(CharlotteWebb @ Tue 26th January 2010, 9:47pm)
QUOTE(Peter Damian @ Mon 25th January 2010, 8:46pm)
Where is Victim of Censorship when you need him? How about
WIKEPEIDA: shit pile of filth
WIKEPEIDA: evil, despicable Shitfarm, an offense to Human dignity, respect and knowledge
Rhindle did a mighty good Joe-job in http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?act=findpost&pid=214172.
WIKIPEDIA MUST DIE A SLOW PAINFUL DEATH AND ANYONE WHO EDITS THERE IS A COMPLETE JACKASS AND SHOULD GO TO JAIL
Is good, but I like his "I can't believe it's an encyclopedia!" better.
Would you like to be 1/3 or the troika along with either Milton or Jonny (depending on who responds first) and myself that will choose the nominees for the poll?
Posted by: Somey
QUOTE(RDH(Ghost In The Machine) @ Tue 26th January 2010, 4:04pm)
Is good, but I like his "I can't believe it's an encyclopedia!" better.
Personally, I thought "the discussion was closed before it even really got off the ground" would make a good motto, given the current state of things over there.
Posted by: LessHorrid vanU
Wikipedia:Where Some Truths Are More Equal Than Others ?
Posted by: Somey
How about This must be where knowledge goes when it dies...?
Posted by: Jon Awbrey
QUOTE(RDH(Ghost In The Machine) @ Tue 26th January 2010, 5:04pm)
WIKIPEDIA MUST DIE A SLOW PAINFUL DEATH AND ANYONE WHO EDITS THERE IS A COMPLETE JACKASS AND SHOULD GO TO JAIL
Is good, but I like his "I can't believe it's an encyclopedia!" better.
Would you like to be 1/3 or the troika along with either Milton or Jonny (depending on who responds first) and myself that will choose the nominees for the poll?
Well, that's a bit derivative of the http://www.icantbelieveitsnotbutter.com/turnthetubaround/ line, and even muffs the punch a bit — and I'm really still hoping the classic Lake of Shit shtick will eventually work up some Google cachet.
Jon
Posted by: RDH(Ghost In The Machine)
QUOTE(Somey @ Tue 26th January 2010, 10:25pm)
How about This must be where knowledge goes when it dies...?
"So this is how knowledge dies...with thunderous applause.â€
QUOTE(Jon Awbrey @ Tue 26th January 2010, 10:30pm)
QUOTE(RDH(Ghost In The Machine) @ Tue 26th January 2010, 5:04pm)
WIKIPEDIA MUST DIE A SLOW PAINFUL DEATH AND ANYONE WHO EDITS THERE IS A COMPLETE JACKASS AND SHOULD GO TO JAIL
Is good, but I like his "I can't believe it's an encyclopedia!" better.
Would you like to be 1/3 or the troika along with either Milton or Jonny (depending on who responds first) and myself that will choose the nominees for the poll?
Well, that's a bit derivative of the http://www.icantbelieveitsnotbutter.com/turnthetubaround/ line, and even muffs the punch a bit, and I was really hoping the classic Lake of Shit shtick would eventually work up some Google cachet.
Jon
Burning lake of shit...must be burning...makes for a nice hellish/toxic waste dump ambiance.
BTW, I'd be honored if you'd join lil ol moi as 2/3 of the judging troika.
Posted by: Jon Awbrey
QUOTE(Somey @ Tue 26th January 2010, 5:15pm)
QUOTE(RDH(Ghost In The Machine) @ Tue 26th January 2010, 4:04pm)
Is good, but I like his "I can't believe it's an encyclopedia!" better.
Personally, I thought "the discussion was closed before it even really got off the ground" would make a good motto, given the current state of things over there.
It was necessary to destroy the knowledge in order to save it.
Jon
Posted by: RDH(Ghost In The Machine)
QUOTE(Jon Awbrey @ Tue 26th January 2010, 10:42pm)
QUOTE(Somey @ Tue 26th January 2010, 5:15pm)
QUOTE(RDH(Ghost In The Machine) @ Tue 26th January 2010, 4:04pm)
Is good, but I like his "I can't believe it's an encyclopedia!" better.
Personally, I thought "the discussion was closed before it even really got off the ground" would make a good motto, given the current state of things over there.
It was necessary to destroy the knowledge in order to save it.
Jon
Posted by: CharlotteWebb
Our Man in Rotterdam put it quite well:
QUOTE(Guido den Broeder @ Thu 6th August 2009, 12:37pm)
Yes, but that won't help Wikipedia, which features the difference of all human knowledge rather than the sum.
I figure this means on its best days a WP article will only reflect the portion [of human knowledge] which nobody powerful enough has an interest in vetoing.
I figure by the end of the song, Leeroy "Free Encyclopedia" Brown will look like a jigsaw puzzle with most of the pieces defaced, inverted, redacted, cut in half, or painted out by request of EMI.
That's what the broken globe logo is all about, right?
Posted by: RDH(Ghost In The Machine)
QUOTE(CharlotteWebb @ Tue 26th January 2010, 11:06pm)
Our Man in Rotterdam put it quite well:
QUOTE(Guido den Broeder @ Thu 6th August 2009, 12:37pm)
Yes, but that won't help Wikipedia, which features the difference of all human knowledge rather than the sum.
I figure this means on its best days a WP article will only reflect the portion [of human knowledge] which nobody powerful enough has an interest in vetoing.
I figure by the end of the song, Leeroy "Free Encyclopedia" Brown will look like a jigsaw puzzle with most of the pieces defaced, inverted, redacted, cut in half, or painted out by request of EMI.
That's what the broken globe logo is all about, right?
"The difference of all human knowledge rather than the sum."
Is hereby duly nominated.
And I concur...before the end finally comes, many will just say FORK it...
Posted by: SB_Johnny
A compendium of knowledge, or at least something that looks like a compendium of knowledge.
Or maybe better: "An encyclopedia, or whatever."
Posted by: Milton Roe
Wikipedia: Where something a big newspaper prints about your life is considered more reliable than what you yourself remember. Even if the newspaper got the "fact" from you in the first place, and fucked goofed it up.
Wikipedia: Where scurrilously and anonymously attacking the academic credentials of an opponent's source is considered fair, but pointing out that your adolescent opponent himself has absolutely no idea what he's talking about, is considered bad faith.
Posted by: A Horse With No Name
Wikipedia: Where the teenagers are hyperactive, the men are fat and the women are super sexy (except Risker, who looks like a homeless man in a wig).
Posted by: victim of censorship
QUOTE(Kwork @ Tue 26th January 2010, 7:26pm)
To paraphrase an old bumper sticker from the Southern U.S.:
If Your Heart Ain't In Wiki Get Your Ass Out.
IN Chicago, to paraphrase an old saying, if you got a rabid dog threatening the neighborhood, you then shoot it and get rid of it.
Wikipedia is a threat to value of accurate knowledge, to peoples lives and reputations, and steals peoples ideas and distorts and cheapens them for the benefit of a few leet (global trotting techno gladflys -JIMMY-SUZZIE and a cadre of other wikileet on staff.)
Posted by: RDH(Ghost In The Machine)
Nominated on behalf of VoC:
Wikipedia: An http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YtepuyvsGbg of shit!
Posted by: gomi
QUOTE(Kwork @ Tue 26th January 2010, 11:26am)
To paraphrase an old bumper sticker from the Southern U.S.:
If Your Heart Ain't In Wiki Get Your Ass Out.
"'My country, right or wrong,' is a thing that no patriot would think of saying. It is like saying, 'My mother, drunk or sober.'" - G.K. Chesterton, "A Defence of Patriotism", 1901
Posted by: The Joy
QUOTE(gomi @ Wed 27th January 2010, 2:24am)
QUOTE(Kwork @ Tue 26th January 2010, 11:26am)
To paraphrase an old bumper sticker from the Southern U.S.:
If Your Heart Ain't In Wiki Get Your Ass Out.
"'My country, right or wrong,' is a thing that no patriot would think of saying. It is like saying, 'My mother, drunk or sober.'" - G.K. Chesterton, "A Defence of Patriotism", 1901
"H'aint we got all the fools in town on our side? And ain't that a big enough majority in any town?" - Mark Twain, Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, 1885
Posted by: Cock-up-over-conspiracy
"Wikipedia ... The Unqualified in Pursuit of the Unreferencable" -- with all respects to Oscar Wilde
Or perhaps ...
"Wikipedia ... The Inept in Pursuit of the Unreadable" {{fact}}.
All modifications on the theme welcomed.
Posted by: Milton Roe
QUOTE(Cock-up-over-conspiracy @ Wed 27th January 2010, 2:01am)
"Wikipedia ... The Unqualified in Pursuit of the Unreferencable" -- with all respects to Oscar Wilde
Or perhaps ...
"Wikipedia ... The Inept in Pursuit of the Unreadable" {{fact}}.
All modifications on the theme welcomed.
"Unept"? That's one of those words you dare not get wrong, like incompetant.
Posted by: dogbiscuit
Wikipedia: It looks so plausible.
Posted by: A Horse With No Name
Wikipedia - Larry Sanger's good idea, Jimmy Wales' meatgrinder!
I have already billed Jimbo $1,000 for this slogan.
I thought you gave Jimbo $1,000.
Well, money changed hands.
Posted by: RDH(Ghost In The Machine)
Wikipedia: No country for old men!
Posted by: Cock-up-over-conspiracy
QUOTE(Milton Roe @ Wed 27th January 2010, 9:04am)
QUOTE(Cock-up-over-conspiracy @ Wed 27th January 2010, 2:01am)
"Wikipedia ... The Inept in Pursuit of the Unreadable" {{fact}}.
"Unept"? That's one of those words you dare not get wrong, like incompetant.
Who is that ... Milton "Those-Sneaky-Japs-Started-It-First" Roe? I should have guessed.
It says, "inept" ... you need new glasses. Or could just try your copyediting skills on the Pee-dia. So ...
Wikipedia ... the only encyclopedia which looks better if you don't wear your glasses.
Posted by: Rhindle
QUOTE(Jon Awbrey @ Wed 27th January 2010, 10:16am)
QUOTE(A Horse With No Name @ Wed 27th January 2010, 1:03pm)
Wikipedia: Can You Figure Out Which Admin Is Really Greg Kohs?
Wikipedia : Can You Figure Out How Many Admins Are Really Greg Kohs?
WP:CYFOHMAARGK?
Perhaps wikipedia should change its name to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Where%27s_Waldo%3F
Posted by: The Joy
Wikipedia: Remember Rome? Well, in our case, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimbo_Wales really did kill http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Sanger.
Wikipedia: At least we're not NBC.
Wikipedia: Mzoli's Meat and more!
Wikipedia: Providing Free Drama since 2000!
Wikipedia: You, too, can save an African child. Just right click on the child's picture, choose Save Image As, and then release it into the GFDL/CC-by-SA license via Wikipedia.
That's all I have at the moment.
Posted by: RDH(Ghost In The Machine)
Wikipedia: 1984 and a half.
Which is also the original working title of one of my all time fav flicks http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0088846/!
Posted by: Peter Damian
WIKIPEIDA: the Rosemary's Baby of the web
WIKIPEIDA: a huge ocean of Shit, stinking up the Internet (thank you Vic)
Posted by: RDH(Ghost In The Machine)
Wikipedia: Brendon iz ghey!
Posted by: Cock-up-over-conspiracy
Wikipedia: No One can Hear You Scream in MainSpace
Posted by: NotARepublican55
Wikipedia - free porn, no viruses.
Posted by: Milton Roe
QUOTE(Cock-up-over-conspiracy @ Thu 28th January 2010, 9:00pm)
Wikipedia: No One can Hear You Scream in MainSpace
Alien. Not quite it:
In Mainspace, No One Can Hear You Scream.
Very good.
QUOTE(Cock-up-over-conspiracy @ Wed 27th January 2010, 10:03pm)
QUOTE(Milton Roe @ Wed 27th January 2010, 9:04am)
QUOTE(Cock-up-over-conspiracy @ Wed 27th January 2010, 2:01am)
"Wikipedia ... The Inept in Pursuit of the Unreadable" {{fact}}.
"Unept"? That's one of those words you dare not get wrong, like incompetant.
Who is that ... Milton "Those-Sneaky-Japs-Started-It-First" Roe? I should have guessed.
It says, "inept" ... you need new glasses. Or could just try your copyediting skills on the Pee-dia. So ...
Wikipedia ... the only encyclopedia which looks better if you don't wear your glasses.
I could have sworn it said unept. You're right; without glasses that screen has to be at JUUUST the right distance.
(However, the sneaky Japs still did indeed start it first)
QUOTE(RDH(Ghost In The Machine) @ Mon 25th January 2010, 10:48am)
Since the old motto has become a tired and embarrassing joke, there was http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jimbo_Wales&oldid=339939251#New_Mottothat better reflects the true nature of WP. The discussion was closed before it even really got off the ground. Which is a pity because Wikiland really does need a new motto.
My suggestion, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Matt_Lewis, would be:
Written by the unwell, read by the unwise.
Any other suggestions?
Imagine a world in which every single person on the planet has free access to the sum of all human knowledge, reduced to a few million pages without any original research or any synthesis. Or without anybody ever doing very much thinking at all.
Posted by: Sarcasticidealist
For any broadway musical fans:
{{fact}}s are the enemy of truth.
Posted by: Jon Awbrey
QUOTE(Jon Awbrey @ Thu 28th January 2010, 9:08am)
QUOTE(RDH(Ghost In The Machine) @ Thu 28th January 2010, 5:19am)
As I understand it, this place is intended to be a sort of purgatory or http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KY0IXwsCxZI, between the Review's "real" forums and the Pit.
In which case I'm the mod you seek since, as a ghost, I exist in such a void.
Jimbo Limbo — How Low Can You Go !?
Oh wait … wrong thread …
Jon
QUOTE(Jon Awbrey @ Fri 29th January 2010, 7:36am)
QUOTE(Viridae @ Fri 29th January 2010, 3:59am)
If you don't want to get blocked, stop signing your name …
Wikipedia — It costs you nothing but your integrity
So many mottoes, so little space …
Jon
Posted by: A Horse With No Name
Wikipedia: It's cheaper than Lexapro
Posted by: RDH(Ghost In The Machine)
Wikipedia: Always open yet also closed.
Posted by: Jon Awbrey
Wikipedia — The Stuff That Hoaxes Are Made On
Jon
Posted by: Cock-up-over-conspiracy
Wikipedia is good. However, some people say it bad. However, several widely accepted studies say it full or errors. However, other websites say it has not. However, not all of them are reliable. However, many are. TRAVIS MUROCK IS A FAG. Would you like to see http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Uncircumcised_and_circumcised_penis.JPG?
Posted by: RDH(Ghost In The Machine)
Wikipedia: Mostly Harmless.
Posted by: dogbiscuit
QUOTE(RDH(Ghost In The Machine) @ Tue 2nd February 2010, 2:28am)
Wikipedia: Mostly Harmless.
Its motto used to be "Mostly Harmless" but after a report from a small child in Africa they changed it.
What does it say now?
Wikipedia: Mostly Useless.
Posted by: RDH(Ghost In The Machine)
QUOTE(dogbiscuit @ Tue 2nd February 2010, 9:56am)
QUOTE(RDH(Ghost In The Machine) @ Tue 2nd February 2010, 2:28am)
Wikipedia: Mostly Harmless.
Its motto used to be "Mostly Harmless" but after a report from a small child in Africa they changed it.
What does it say now?
Wikipedia: Mostly Useless.
I believe the author of that report is http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=27789.
Posted by: Jon Awbrey
Wikipedia — The Emperor Has No Disclosure
Jon
Posted by: RDH(Ghost In The Machine)
Wikipedia: When Mediocrity marries http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idiocracy.
Posted by: Rhindle
QUOTE(Jon Awbrey @ Tue 26th January 2010, 2:30pm)
QUOTE(RDH(Ghost In The Machine) @ Tue 26th January 2010, 5:04pm)
WIKIPEDIA MUST DIE A SLOW PAINFUL DEATH AND ANYONE WHO EDITS THERE IS A COMPLETE JACKASS AND SHOULD GO TO JAIL
Is good, but I like his "I can't believe it's an encyclopedia!" better.
Would you like to be 1/3 or the troika along with either Milton or Jonny (depending on who responds first) and myself that will choose the nominees for the poll?
Well, that's a bit derivative of the http://www.icantbelieveitsnotbutter.com/turnthetubaround/ line, and even muffs the punch a bit — and I'm really still hoping the classic Lake of Shit shtick will eventually work up some Google cachet.
Jon
Wikipedia: It's margarine to a print encyclopedia's butter.
Posted by: Cock-up-over-conspiracy
Wikipedia ... it is http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=28343&st=50&gopid=219553entry219553.
Posted by: Jon Awbrey
Wikipedia — No Honor Among Dweebs
Jon
Posted by: RDH(Ghost In The Machine)
Wikipedia: We have dorkyness here that does not sleep.
QUOTE(RDH(Ghost In The Machine) @ Fri 5th February 2010, 9:13pm)
Wikipedia: The Neverland Ranch of knowledge!
You're such a meanie! You made Pedo Bear cry!
Posted by: Milton Roe
QUOTE(RDH(Ghost In The Machine) @ Fri 5th February 2010, 8:13pm)
Wikipedia: Almost as cool as playing Farmville!
Farm Town, damnit.
Posted by: RDH(Ghost In The Machine)
QUOTE(Cedric @ Sat 6th February 2010, 8:11pm)
QUOTE(RDH(Ghost In The Machine) @ Fri 5th February 2010, 9:13pm)
Wikipedia: The Neverland Ranch of knowledge!
You're such a meanie! You made Pedo Bear cry!
Yes, I'm a mean, heartless beotch
QUOTE(Milton Roe @ Sat 6th February 2010, 8:19pm)
QUOTE(RDH(Ghost In The Machine) @ Fri 5th February 2010, 8:13pm)
Wikipedia: Almost as cool as playing Farmville!
Farm Town, damnit.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FarmVille, actually, my dear Milton.
Posted by: victim of censorship
Wikipedia .... "Where children learn that pedophiles can be their friend"
or
"Where pedophiles teach your children"
Posted by: Jon Awbrey
Truth — The First Casualty Of Wikipedia
Posted by: Milton Roe
QUOTE(RDH(Ghost In The Machine) @ Sun 7th February 2010, 5:13am)
QUOTE(Cedric @ Sat 6th February 2010, 8:11pm)
QUOTE(RDH(Ghost In The Machine) @ Fri 5th February 2010, 9:13pm)
Wikipedia: The Neverland Ranch of knowledge!
You're such a meanie! You made Pedo Bear cry!
Yes, I'm a mean, heartless beotch
QUOTE(Milton Roe @ Sat 6th February 2010, 8:19pm)
QUOTE(RDH(Ghost In The Machine) @ Fri 5th February 2010, 8:13pm)
Wikipedia: Almost as cool as playing Farmville!
Farm Town, damnit.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FarmVille, actually, my dear Milton.
Okay, but Farmville started as a clone of the original Farm Town on facebook. And the stituation is far worse than I'd thought, because now there are two of them.
Posted by: HRIP7
Wikipedia. The Free Encyclopedia. Keeping the vain and opinionated off the streets since 2001.
Posted by: RDH(Ghost In The Machine)
Wikipedia: Surrender knowledge, you will be assimilated, resistance is futile.
Wikipedia: Bringing democracy to knowledge, the facts will greet us as liberators!
Posted by: Messedrocker
I would argue that most of you are doing it wrong. There is no wit to devising a slogan that Wikipedia would never think of adopting. You have to write one that is stupid yet can possibly be adopted as a slogan.
With that, I bring you in Jon Awbrey-style glamor:
Wikipedia Forever!
Oh, wait...
Posted by: GlassBeadGame
QUOTE(Messedrocker @ Sat 13th February 2010, 8:03pm)
I would argue that most of you are doing it wrong. There is no wit to devising a slogan that Wikipedia would never think of adopting. You have to write one that is stupid yet can possibly be adopted as a slogan.
With that, I bring you in Jon Awbrey-style glamor:
Wikipedia Forever!
Oh, wait...
Miranda Warning: O brave new world that has such people in it.
Posted by: Cock-up-over-conspiracy
QUOTE(Messedrocker @ Sat 13th February 2010, 8:03pm)
I would argue that most of you are doing it wrong. There is no wit to devising a slogan that Wikipedia would never think of adopting.
Wikipedia: We don't need no stinking medication.
Posted by: Zoloft
Wikipedia: A Mudkip-free zone.
Posted by: EricBarbour
Jimbo: my homie!
Posted by: Peter Damian
WIKIPEIDA:An amalgam of bits and pieces of information that turn up in Google searches, cobbled together by guesses at what the bits mean
(Thank you Lawrence Solomon) http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fpcomment/archive/2010/02/13/lawrence-solomon-who-am-i.aspx#ixzz0fWIsHVRs
Posted by: Jon Awbrey
₪₪₪ Wikipedia ₪₪₪
Where Not Getting Hanged Means Never Having To Say You're Sorry
Thanks! and a Tip o' th' Hat to Miltown Row —
QUOTE(Milton Roe @ Wed 3rd February 2010, 7:30pm)
We didn't hang all the Nazis, either.
Posted by: CharlotteWebb
QUOTE(Jon Awbrey @ Mon 15th February 2010, 12:35pm)
₪₪₪ Wikipedia ₪₪₪
Needs about 24 more sheqalim, and don't get me started about inflation.
Posted by: A Horse With No Name
QUOTE(RDH(Ghost In The Machine) @ Fri 5th February 2010, 10:13pm)
Wikipedia: The Neverland Ranch of knowledge!
My favorite WP photo:
Jimbo Wales (far right) consults with his admin corps.
Posted by: Jon Awbrey
QUOTE(CharlotteWebb @ Mon 15th February 2010, 1:45pm)
Needs about 24 more sheqalim, and don't get me started about inflation.
₪₪₪₪₪ Wikipedia ₪₪₪₪₪
₪₪₪₪₪ We're Not Hung, Er, Hanged ₪₪₪₪₪
₪₪₪₪₪ Well, Some Of Us Aren't ₪₪₪₪₪
Posted by: RDH(Ghost In The Machine)
QUOTE(Messedrocker @ Sun 14th February 2010, 1:03am)
I would argue that most of you are doing it wrong. There is no wit to devising a slogan that Wikipedia would never think of adopting. You have to write one that is stupid yet can possibly be adopted as a slogan.
With that, I bring you in Jon Awbrey-style glamor:
Wikipedia: http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?act=ST&f=62&t=28661&st=0#entry222640. (link to discussion)
Funnily enough, "http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pseudointellectual&direction=prev&oldid=268361197ism" despite an early attempt by Zach Odonnel to explain that it means "somebody who is gay or homosexual" and two of the most http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Pseudointellectual_(2nd_nomination) I have seen.
That's my Wiki ...!
Posted by: WikiWatch
Wikipedia: No-one here gets out undamaged.
Posted by: CharlotteWebb
QUOTE(RDH(Ghost In The Machine) @ Fri 19th February 2010, 12:52pm)
What? That should be a disambiguation page, surely. Apparently somebody renamed Seigenthalergate to this non-descript title. I suppose they'll be moving Essjay to [[Tenured professor controversy]] next.
Posted by: Peter Damian
WIKIPEIDA: Occasionally, anvils fall from the sky.
Posted by: GlassBeadGame
QUOTE(Peter Damian @ Sun 21st February 2010, 7:08am)
WIKIPEIDA: Occasionally, anvils fall from the sky.
Also see: WP:BEEPBEEP.
Posted by: Jon Awbrey
The answer to the problem of BS is more BS
Posted by: Cock-up-over-conspiracy
QUOTE(Jon Awbrey @ Mon 22nd February 2010, 6:40am)
The answer to the problem of BS is more BS
... and the answer to "more BS" is to chop it up and stir it about really hard.
Wikipedia: the internet's http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=28672&st=0entry222943*
* See link. em·broi·der (m-broidr) v.intr. to add embellishments or fanciful details ... "embroider the truth".
Posted by: Jon Awbrey
QUOTE(Cock-up-over-conspiracy @ Mon 22nd February 2010, 10:29pm)
Wikipedia: the internet's http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=28672&st=0entry222943*
* See link. em·broi·der (m-broidr) v.intr. to add embellishments or fanciful details … "embroider the truth".
See WP:NEEDLEPOINT
Jon
Posted by: Jon Awbrey
Wikipedia — Night of the Living Deadmin
Posted by: Jon Awbrey
Millions for PR — Crowdsourcing is for Peons
Posted by: Peter Damian
QUOTE(NotARepublican55 @ Mon 22nd February 2010, 9:54pm)
Unfortunately Wikipedia (as a general rule) seems to value quantity over quality, it's like the "Walmart" of online encyclopedias. 100 crappy articles are better than 1 good article since more content = more google hits.
WIKIPEIDA: the Walmart of online encyclopedias
Posted by: A Horse With No Name
QUOTE(Peter Damian @ Wed 24th February 2010, 6:47am)
Wikipedia: The Encyclopedia That Anybody Can Edit Incorrectly
Posted by: RMHED
Wikipedia — The wannabe encylopedia.
Wikipedia —Where reliable libel is liable to lie.
Posted by: Jon Awbrey
QUOTE(RMHED @ Thu 25th February 2010, 3:50pm)
Wikipedia — The wannabe encylopedia.
I think that's spelled ensilopedia.
Jon
Posted by: Zoloft
Consult Wikipedia - We've always been at war with Eastasia.
Posted by: Jon Awbrey
On the Proposal to Build a Wiki-Based Encyclopedia —
“The proposal would encourage the gathering of mobs and I find the cure to be worse than the disease.â€
Thanks! and a tip o' th' hat to Sam the Wiki-Parrot
Posted by: GlassBeadGame
QUOTE(Jon Awbrey @ Sat 27th February 2010, 5:10pm)
On the Proposal to Build a Wiki-Based Encyclopedia —
“The proposal would encourage the gathering of mobs and I find the cure to be worse than the disease.â€
Thanks! and a tip o' th' hat to Sam the Wiki-Parrot
Posted by: Jon Awbrey
QUOTE(GlassBeadGame @ Sat 27th February 2010, 5:16pm)
QUOTE(Jon Awbrey @ Sat 27th February 2010, 5:10pm)
On the Proposal to Build a Wiki-Based Encyclopedia —
“The proposal would encourage the gathering of mobs and I find the cure to be worse than the disease.â€
Thanks! and a tip o' th' hat to Sam the Wiki-Parrot
So that's what they mean by Blue Ribbon Commission.
Jon
Posted by: RDH(Ghost In The Machine)
QUOTE
Wikipedia: While you're a part of Crackerbox Palace Do what the rest all do Or face the fact that Crackerbox Palace May have no other choice than to deport you.
Posted by: Jon Awbrey
The Truth Is Out There ‡
‡ until it gets oversighted …
Posted by: Jon Awbrey
Wikipedia — It's Assymptotal !
Posted by: The Joy
Wikipedia: Let's trim our hair in accordance with the socialist lifestyle!
Wikipedia: Our experiment requires that you continue.
Posted by: Zoloft
Wikipedia: Don't bite the newbie; instead set them on fire.
Posted by: Cock-up-over-conspiracy
Wikipedia: Don't bite the newbie ... we have already shat on them.
Posted by: Subtle Bee
Speaking of shat-upon noobs, anyone know why my inaugural New Topic posting in The Lounge was apparently deleted? I figured I'd be safe there.
Anyway, while I'm here again, I'd like to pitch:
"Wikipedia: fuck you, troll, fuck you."
Posted by: dogbiscuit
QUOTE(Subtle Bee @ Wed 10th March 2010, 12:53am)
Speaking of shat-upon noobs, anyone know why my inaugural New Topic posting in The Lounge was apparently deleted? I figured I'd be safe there.
Anyway, while I'm here again, I'd like to pitch:
"Wikipedia: fuck you, troll, fuck you."
I'm halfway through dealing with it. It was reported as it seemed to be rather spammish. I agreed and moved it out of the way. If other mods disagree then it can reappear.
Not a very warm welcome I appreciate, but often we assume that posters have already got a feel of the place before they dive in.
Anyhow, welcome. At least we haven't blocked your IP - yet
I had popped in to post:
Wikipedia - don't bite the newbie, they've already been banned and won't be able to read your posts.
So, I am on thin ice too
Posted by: Subtle Bee
QUOTE(dogbiscuit @ Tue 9th March 2010, 4:58pm)
QUOTE(Subtle Bee @ Wed 10th March 2010, 12:53am)
Speaking of shat-upon noobs, anyone know why my inaugural New Topic posting in The Lounge was apparently deleted? I figured I'd be safe there.
Anyway, while I'm here again, I'd like to pitch:
"Wikipedia: fuck you, troll, fuck you."
I'm halfway through dealing with it. It was reported as it seemed to be rather spammish. I agreed and moved it out of the way. If other mods disagree then it can reappear.
Not a very warm welcome I appreciate, but often we assume that posters have already got a feel of the place before they dive in.
Anyhow, welcome. At least we haven't blocked your IP - yet
I had popped in to post:
Wikipedia - don't bite the newbie, they've already been banned and won't be able to read your posts.
So, I am on thin ice too
If, on re-reading, anyone still honestly believes I'm a spam mole for the molasses industry , and not a noob trying to break the ice with a chuckle (in the off-topic forum, next to an exerpt from an EBay ad!), it's probably best if you do just block me, which is too bad after all I went through to get here. Still, I can't possibly be that unfunny.
Posted by: dogbiscuit
QUOTE(Subtle Bee @ Wed 10th March 2010, 1:17am)
If, on re-reading, anyone still honestly believes I'm a spam mole for the molasses industry , and not a noob trying to break the ice with a chuckle (in the off-topic forum, next to an exerpt from an EBay ad!), it's probably best if you do just block me, which is too bad after all I went through to get here. Still, I can't possibly be that unfunny.
A couple of points: re-quoting a scad of text rather than referencing it is poor technique, better to quote a little gem and then give a little sales pitch to attract people to click. (Eric is an ancient and established member where most people know exactly where he stands, who contributes many focused observations on the happenings of Wikipedia, who is an expert on valves, so there was a lot of context to his post that you wouldn't have picked up on - which is fine, because you are a noob).
As H said to you via e-mail, this is not a social networking site, and I think what this means is that we clearly do natter and chatter about all sorts of crap, but that works best if you first establish your character through your views on Wikipedia, which is the purpose of the site. So, yes it was a heavy handed response, and I am sorry about that, but we can all look on this as a wonderful learning experience, can't we?
For example, we have no idea if you are a person who thinks Wikipedia is a wonderful idea with no flaws, or you think it is a tragedy for mankind, or if you are a person who does not think at all. What one lesson would you like mankind to learn about Wikipedia?
Posted by: RDH(Ghost In The Machine)
Harumph! Getting back to subject here
Wikipedia: Where the bullshit piles high as an http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikiality_and_Other_Tripling_Elephants eye!
Posted by: Jon Awbrey
QUOTE(RDH(Ghost In The Machine) @ Wed 10th March 2010, 6:30am)
Harumph! Getting back to subject here
Harumph!² — Could some nice mod please move the non-bon-motto flaming to the tarpit — some of us are busting our brains here trying to find Wikipedia a new motto.
Synsearly yours,
Quasi Motto
Posted by: GlassBeadGame
QUOTE(dogbiscuit @ Wed 10th March 2010, 5:22am)
QUOTE(Subtle Bee @ Wed 10th March 2010, 1:17am)
If, on re-reading, anyone still honestly believes I'm a spam mole for the molasses industry , and not a noob trying to break the ice with a chuckle (in the off-topic forum, next to an exerpt from an EBay ad!), it's probably best if you do just block me, which is too bad after all I went through to get here. Still, I can't possibly be that unfunny.
A couple of points: re-quoting a scad of text rather than referencing it is poor technique, better to quote a little gem and then give a little sales pitch to attract people to click. (Eric is an ancient and established member where most people know exactly where he stands, who contributes many focused observations on the happenings of Wikipedia, who is an expert on valves, so there was a lot of context to his post that you wouldn't have picked up on - which is fine, because you are a noob).
As H said to you via e-mail, this is not a social networking site, and I think what this means is that we clearly do natter and chatter about all sorts of crap, but that works best if you first establish your character through your views on Wikipedia, which is the purpose of the site. So, yes it was a heavy handed response, and I am sorry about that, but we can all look on this as a wonderful learning experience, can't we?
For example, we have no idea if you are a person who thinks Wikipedia is a wonderful idea with no flaws, or you think it is a tragedy for mankind, or if you are a person who does not think at all. What one lesson would you like mankind to learn about Wikipedia?
I was going to put it in the Annex when I noticed someone else had already deleted it. I thought it was not much worse than some of the other feeble attempts at starting threads meant to be "on-topic." Wikipedia's treatment of the molasses industry as an important topic is no more off the mark than some others.
Posted by: Somey
QUOTE(Jon Awbrey @ Wed 10th March 2010, 7:12am)
Harumph!² — Could some nice mod please move the non-bon-motto flaming to the tarpit — some of us are busting our brains here trying to find Wikipedia a new motto.
We shall move that and related posts (including this one, and the deleted one IMO) to the WRR forum as soon as Mr. Bee has amassed enough posts of his own to view and post to that forum...
Anyway, it's just that nobody ever did anything like that here before, and we're a little hypervigilant when it comes to new registrants, given the fact that the real spammers are far more numerous (and probably far more clever) than we are. I'm sure Mr. Bee understands - it's nothing personal!
Posted by: Milton Roe
Wikipedia
Where No One Knows You're a Dog But We Can Still Tell You're an Asshole
Posted by: powercorrupts
Wikipedia: Don't mention the War!
Wikipedia: You've never been so important
Wikipedia: It beats beating the kids
Wikipedia: The toss of a coin
Wikipedia: Digitally reversing time
Wikipedia: Global arse kiss
Wikipedia: Your future ends here
Wikipedia: I want to pie your life
Wikipedia: When you win the war that matters
Wikipedia: Knot for profit
Wikipedia: Chapters made of bytes and stone
Wikipedia: Your money and time will provide a few of these children roofs over their yachts
Wikipedia: Piss-take Unlimited
Posted by: A Horse With No Name
Wikipedia: Fasten your seatbelts, it's going to be a bumpy ride!
Wikipedia The Garbage Dump that Actually is [[WP:NOTPAPER]]
Posted by: Subtle Bee
QUOTE(Somey @ Wed 10th March 2010, 10:01am)
QUOTE(Jon Awbrey @ Wed 10th March 2010, 7:12am)
Harumph!² — Could some nice mod please move the non-bon-motto flaming to the tarpit — some of us are busting our brains here trying to find Wikipedia a new motto.
We shall move that and related posts (including this one, and the deleted one IMO) to the WRR forum as soon as Mr. Bee has amassed enough posts of his own to view and post to that forum...
Anyway, it's just that nobody ever did anything like that here before, and we're a little hypervigilant when it comes to new registrants, given the fact that the real spammers are far more numerous (and probably far more clever) than we are. I'm sure Mr. Bee understands - it's nothing personal!
Thanks for that, Mr. Somey, I think that made sense. So yes, I do understand. But I agree with (and apologize to) John A & RDH [IAWAATJAARDH] - I feel bad that the thread got derailed, and am happy for the crap to be clipped, whether or not I can see it. I'd be even happier if no one had seen it, but that ship has sailed.
Of course, it would be unproductive of me to point out that a quick message informing me of the deletion would have prevented me ever asking, and thus the whole subsequent public analysis of my various shortcomings...
But nobody likes paralipsis.
ps as pennance for my sins against this thread:
"Wikipedia: one monkey short of Shakespeare."
Posted by: powercorrupts
Wikipedia: You shit in my pants
Posted by: Zoloft
Wikipedia: Open-source honey from bees, flies, and wasps
Posted by: Milton Roe
QUOTE(Subtle Bee @ Thu 11th March 2010, 2:15am)
ps as pennance for my sins against this thread:
"Wikipedia: one monkey short of Shakespeare."
Good. I would have said "Always a few monkeys short of Shakespeare" but yours better conveys the manic and unjustified optimism of the place.
Posted by: RDH(Ghost In The Machine)
QUOTE(Milton Roe @ Thu 11th March 2010, 8:32pm)
QUOTE(Subtle Bee @ Thu 11th March 2010, 2:15am)
ps as pennance for my sins against this thread:
"Wikipedia: one monkey short of Shakespeare."
Good. I would have said "Always a few monkeys short of Shakespeare" but yours better conveys the manic and unjustified optimism of the place.
A fine motto indeed! Welcome to the Review Mr. Bee!
Here's a couple oldies but goodies:
Wikipedia: The Infobahn's largest truckstop restroom wall!
Wikipedia: The Infoverse's largest black hole of nerd text!
Posted by: Subtle Bee
QUOTE(Milton Roe @ Thu 11th March 2010, 12:32pm)
QUOTE(Subtle Bee @ Thu 11th March 2010, 2:15am)
ps as pennance for my sins against this thread:
"Wikipedia: one monkey short of Shakespeare."
Good. I would have said "Always a few monkeys short of Shakespeare" but yours better conveys the manic and unjustified optimism of the place.
Thanks. What's neat is that there's already a companion article for it on-wiki that nicely expands the metaphor. Particularly the section titled "Real monkeys". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinite_monkey_theorem
QUOTE(RDH(Ghost In The Machine) @ Fri 12th March 2010, 12:47am)
A fine motto indeed! Welcome to the Review Mr. Bee!
What, no barnstar?
Posted by: Eva Destruction
QUOTE
Primate behaviorists Cheney and Seyfarth remark that real monkeys would indeed have to rely on chance to have any hope of producing Romeo and Juliet. Unlike apes and particularly chimpanzees, the evidence suggests that monkeys lack a theory of mind and are unable to differentiate between their own and others' knowledge, emotions, and beliefs. Even if a monkey could learn to write a play and describe the characters' behavior, it could not reveal the characters' minds and so build an ironic tragedy.
Words fail me.
Posted by: Peter Damian
I'm sorry but nothing will ever surpass
WIKIPEIDA: Stinking fly-infested lake of shit
Posted by: A Horse With No Name
QUOTE(Subtle Bee @ Fri 12th March 2010, 5:35am)
QUOTE(RDH(Ghost In The Machine) @ Fri 12th March 2010, 12:47am)
A fine motto indeed! Welcome to the Review Mr. Bee!
Oh, poopy. I was gonna start a new thread about that article........
Go ahead. I find it ironic that the Wikipedia cult and the Scientology cult are not friends. Then again, Wikipedia was founded by technological libertarians opposed dogmatically to any limitations on information... be it good, true, false, or bad information. Scientology tries to suppress bad information (true or false) about itself, ergo Wikipedians have openly declared war against it. Even more ironically is that Wikipedians do the same thing to its critics just like Scientology! I see that Cirt (T-C-L-K-R-D)
had a hand in the article. Yes, a separate thread on this could work.
Posted by: powercorrupts
Wikipedia: lipstick on a pig
Wikipedia: organic battery
Posted by: Jon Awbrey
â—„ Wikipedia â–º
Our Brains Are In Our Breaches
Posted by: GlassBeadGame
QUOTE(Jon Awbrey @ Sat 13th March 2010, 1:42pm)
â—„ Wikipedia â–º
Our Brains Are In Our Breaches
That's because they wear tight and faded mensa genes.
"The endless search for consensus (a good thing) fails when there is no clear guidance on the endpoint goals."
— Jimbo Wales, Ides of March, 2010 —
â–¼ English Translation â–¼
"Consensus Bee Wut I Sez It Bee"
Jimbo finding a flaw in WP:CONSENSUS reminds me of blubberfaced Greenspan admitting that he'd found a wee error in his view that the market always regulated itself.
You know, if WP:CONSENSUS always worked, it would have no trouble coming to a WP:CONSENSUS as to what the goals should be. Would it not?
Guess Jimbo sets the goals, now. Other than that, it's YOUR encyclopedia, folks!
Posted by: Jon Awbrey
â—„ Wikipedia â–º
The “Free†Encyclopedia
â–¼ English Translation â–¼
“All It Costs Is Your Integrityâ€
Posted by: powercorrupts
Wikipedia: Plumbed with polished brass
Wikipedia: Skippy the Birch Kangaroo
Wikipedia: Free webslight (spelling negotiable)
Wikipedia: Darren is gay
Wikipedia: Cream at the bottom
Posted by: RDH(Ghost In The Machine)
QUOTE(powercorrupts @ Thu 18th March 2010, 9:17pm)
Wikipedia: Darren is gay
I wonder if he knows Brendon.
Wikipedia: Crap without end...amen.
Posted by: Cock-up-over-conspiracy
Wikipedia: They are not pornographic pictures ... they are educational.
Wikipedia: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4a/Sexual_intercourse.jpg (even if your dick cant get hard).
Posted by: Zoloft
Wikipedia: Where the polydactyls type.
Posted by: RDH(Ghost In The Machine)
Wikipedia: Vajazzled Vulvas in Volvos.
I think Max Cannon of Red Meat psychically sent me that one.
(Well, OK, the Japs can have their own one where cuz no one here can understand a damned word they are saying anyway and they are probably using it to plan an invasion on China.)
Posted by: powercorrupts
WIkipedia:Jimbo's ass-to-face human ladder
Posted by: RDH(Ghost In The Machine)
Wikipedia: Up to our noses in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MUD
Posted by: thegibbon
Wikipedia: totally unbalanced biographies.
Posted by: Cock-up-over-conspiracy
Wikipedia: Would the last admin leaving please turn off the server.
Posted by: Jon Awbrey
â—„ Wikipedia â–º
The Truth Is Where We Hide It
Posted by: Cock-up-over-conspiracy
â—„ Wikipedia â–º
Too many chiefs, http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=29198&pid=230265&st=0entry230265.
That's the motto for Commons isn't it? On the same lines, how about
Wikipedia: showing you the bits other encyclopedias politely leave out.
Posted by: A Horse With No Name
QUOTE(Cock-up-over-conspiracy @ Mon 5th April 2010, 9:56pm)
â—„ Wikipedia â–º
Too many chiefs, http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=29198&pid=230265&st=0entry230265.
But plenty of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pakistanis_in_Belgium
Posted by: Cock-up-over-conspiracy
â—„ Wikipedia:if a project is doomed, shut it down quickly
... AKA The "http://news.slashdot.org/story/10/02/20/1331221/Jimmy-Wales-Theory-of-Failure"
Of course, the other, better unspoken theory of failure is, if you are going to fail, do it with other people's time and money and if it includes destroying the market for real encyclopedias and a generation's intellectual potential ... well then ... sod it. Bank the $10,000 of speaker fees quick.
Posted by: powercorrupts
Wikipedia: Create your own 100% FREE lists - minimal rules apply!
Wikipedia: Where the wood is free but the trees are negotiable
Wikipedia: Finally see your unrecognised leadership qualities get the reward you have always deserved. Earn your wings through being yourself!
Wikipedia: Where birds of a feather flock together
Posted by: RDH(Ghost In The Machine)
Wikipedia: Where http://www.criterion.com/films/765-the-bad-sleep-well.
Posted by: Zoloft
Wikipedia: Band Together to Ban Together
Posted by: Gruntled
Wikipedia: the encyclopedia anyone can edit from two continents simultaneously.
(That's one for the Checkusers.)
Posted by: Cock-up-over-conspiracy
Wikipedia: makes life easier if you suffer from multiple personality disorder.
(That's another one for the Checkusers.)
Posted by: Milton Roe
Wikipedia: The web's Comedy Central, where if you can't roast an enemy like Jon Stewart would, at least you can write their BLP like Stephen Colbert would.
Wikipedia: Where Carolyn Doran's notability was damn http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-notable#Notability_is_not_temporary.
QUOTE(A Horse With No Name @ Wed 14th April 2010, 12:41pm)
Wikipedia: Keeping Lar out of the LEGO box.
I'm not going to touch that one.
Okay, maybe I'll touch it, but that's all.
Buy your own damn LEGO.
Posted by: Greaser
Wikipedia: The End of Human Knowledge — not with a bang but a wang
Posted by: dogbiscuit
Wikipedia: The some of all human knowledge.
or perhaps:
Wikipedia: The Somme of all human knowledge.
Posted by: Cock-up-over-conspiracy
QUOTE(dogbiscuit @ Fri 16th April 2010, 11:39pm)
Wikipedia: The Somme of all human knowledge.
Very good ... very, very good. "Over the top now lads" ... (there are plenty more where they came from).
Wikipedia: the repressant in full pursuit of the irrepressible.
Posted by: Milton Roe
QUOTE(Cock-up-over-conspiracy @ Fri 16th April 2010, 6:15pm)
QUOTE(dogbiscuit @ Fri 16th April 2010, 11:39pm)
Wikipedia: The Somme of all human knowledge.
Very good ... very, very good. "Over the top now lads" ... (there are plenty more where they came from). Wikipedia: the repressant in full pursuit of the irrepressible.
WW I and Wilde. And from the Scottish:
Wikipedia: Nasties and Aspies and unsurpassed-ass-ties, and things that go block in the night.
Posted by: Zoloft
Wikipedia: Where content is not censored, but people are censured.
Posted by: dogbiscuit
QUOTE(Cock-up-over-conspiracy @ Sat 17th April 2010, 2:15am)
QUOTE(dogbiscuit @ Fri 16th April 2010, 11:39pm)
Wikipedia: The Somme of all human knowledge.
Very good ... very, very good. "Over the top now lads" ... (there are plenty more where they came from).
Wikipedia: the repressant in full pursuit of the irrepressible.
I have to admit to being very pleased with myself for that one, which just came out by accident and fermented nicely.
Posted by: Jon Awbrey
QUOTE(dogbiscuit @ Sat 17th April 2010, 9:38am)
I have to admit to being very pleased with myself for that one, which just came out by accident and fermented nicely.
That would make Jimbo the Sommelier — Some Liar, maybe?
Jon
Posted by: Jon Awbrey
â—„ Wikipedia â–º
Chump Chains
Posted by: Milton Roe
QUOTE(Jon Awbrey @ Sat 17th April 2010, 7:42am)
QUOTE(dogbiscuit @ Sat 17th April 2010, 9:38am)
I have to admit to being very pleased with myself for that one, which just came out by accident and fermented nicely.
That would make Jimbo the Sommelier — Some Liar, maybe?
Jon
Mais oui. http://www.nickollsandperks.co.uk/details.asp?prodid=115139NVHND&cat=12, s'il vous plaît.
Posted by: Jon Awbrey
â—„ Wikipedia Review â–º 'Cause trolls like us, Baby we were born to lulz
Posted by: Cock-up-over-conspiracy
Wikipedia: It used to be that the people who won the wars that got to write our history. Wikipedia changes that ... now it is who can win the edit war who gets to write our history.
- with acknowledgments to http://www.wmagazine.com/celebrities/2008/09/jimmy_wales?currentPage=2.
Wikipedia: in the future, everyone will be famous for having days worths of edits on the Wikipedia last 15 minutes.
Posted by: Gruntled
Wikipedia, where many Wikipedia Review contributors can edit and even run the place (but many can't).
Posted by: RDH(Ghost In The Machine)
QUOTE(dogbiscuit @ Fri 16th April 2010, 11:39pm)
Wikipedia: The some of all human knowledge.
or perhaps:
Wikipedia: The Somme of all human knowledge.
Wikipedia Review: The Somey of all Wikipedia criticism!
Posted by: Cock-up-over-conspiracy
Wikipedia: We are accountable for nothing, and we like our amateur hard core porn, so fuck off (WP:INDEF).
Wikipedia: "Two's the whole of the community" ... when it comes to indefinitely banning a third.
Posted by: dogbiscuit
QUOTE(Cock-up-over-conspiracy @ Mon 19th April 2010, 1:06pm)
Wikipedia: We are accountable for nothing, and we like our amateur hard core porn, so fuck off (WP:INDEF).
Wikipedia: "Two's the whole of the community" ... when it comes to indefinitely banning a third.
Wikipedia: two's a community, three's a cabal.
Posted by: GlassBeadGame
me<sub>1</sub> + me<sub>2</sub> + … me<sub>n</sub> ≠ We
Posted by: Jon Awbrey
QUOTE(GlassBeadGame @ Mon 19th April 2010, 5:03pm)
me1 + me2 + … men ≠We
Are we not men?
Wait — how did you get the subscript tags to work?
Not to make legal threats; that is the law. Are we not Wikipedians? Not to be uncivil, that is the law. Are we not Wikipedians? Not to forget WP:NPA; that is the law. Are we not Wikipedians? Not to suck up to Jimbo, that is... er... wait.
Oh, snap.
His is the House of Pain....
Posted by: GlassBeadGame
QUOTE(Jon Awbrey @ Tue 20th April 2010, 6:38pm)
QUOTE(GlassBeadGame @ Mon 19th April 2010, 5:03pm)
me1 + me2 + … men ≠We
Are we not men?
Wait — how did you get the subscript tags to work?
Jon
Use html <sub> tag. First choose html "on" on post options.
Posted by: EricBarbour
Posted by: dogbiscuit
Wikipedia: Disinformation must be free.
Posted by: RDH(Ghost In The Machine)
QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Wed 21st April 2010, 7:14am)
But Hattori-San has retired from katana crafting. And this is the thread that refuses to die.
At Wikipedia, Villainy Is Our Most Important Project.
Posted by: GlassBeadGame
Read Jimmy Wales' lips: No new http://artmarket.org.uk/Cosmos%20and%20Taxis.html
Posted by: powercorrupts
Wikipedia: Information Cancer
Wikipedia: Let them make the cake
Wikipedia: Free CYBERSEXXX! Masturbate your enemy's enemy in public! Join the online orgy now!
Posted by: Somey
QUOTE(Milton Roe @ Tue 20th April 2010, 11:44pm)
QUOTE(Cock-up-over-conspiracy @ Tue 20th April 2010, 9:34pm)
No, we are Devo.
Not to make legal threats; that is the law. Are we not Wikipedians? Not to be uncivil, that is the law. Are we not Wikipedians? Not to forget WP:NPA; that is the law. Are we not Wikipedians? Not to suck up to Jimbo, that is... er... wait.
We've even got an avatar for that one (which nobody is currently using, AFAIK):
Posted by: Milton Roe
QUOTE(Somey @ Tue 27th April 2010, 2:40pm)
QUOTE(Milton Roe @ Tue 20th April 2010, 11:44pm)
QUOTE(Cock-up-over-conspiracy @ Tue 20th April 2010, 9:34pm)
No, we are Devo.
Not to make legal threats; that is the law. Are we not Wikipedians? Not to be uncivil, that is the law. Are we not Wikipedians? Not to forget WP:NPA; that is the law. Are we not Wikipedians? Not to suck up to Jimbo, that is... er... wait.
We've even got an avatar for that one (which nobody is currently using, AFAIK):
Oh, very good. I like my present one (at some point I may even use the real untouched photo), but somebody will surely snap this one up.
Posted by: EricBarbour
QUOTE(Milton Roe @ Tue 27th April 2010, 4:34pm)
Oh, very good. I like my present one (at some point I may even use the real untouched photo), but somebody will surely snap this one up.
Just FYI, Milton: your present avatar photo contains a small detail (actually two of them) that you probably don't know about:
it contains two Roland D-50s. A massively popular keyboard, despite endless complaints about its "bad sound". And still used by thousands of bad bar bands the world over, because nobody with taste or discernment wants old D-50s. Making them dirt cheap to buy on the used market.
Posted by: Jon Awbrey
â—„ Wikipedia â–º
Where Everyone Will Be On Uranus For Fifteen Minutes
Posted by: Milton Roe
QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Tue 27th April 2010, 4:47pm)
QUOTE(Milton Roe @ Tue 27th April 2010, 4:34pm)
Oh, very good. I like my present one (at some point I may even use the real untouched photo), but somebody will surely snap this one up.
Just FYI, Milton: your present avatar photo contains a small detail (actually two of them) that you probably don't know about:
it contains two Roland D-50s. A massively popular keyboard, despite endless complaints about its "bad sound". And still used by thousands of bad bar bands the world over, because nobody with taste or discernment wants old D-50s. Making them dirt cheap to buy on the used market.
Yes, I looked it up. Indeed the '57 Chevy of electric keyboards. Dunno if the guitar is a Fender. I think they should have given LHO a halfstand mic ala Freddie Mercury. It's not as though they tried to do everything in period, as the keyboard is post-1987.
Posted by: Subtle Bee
QUOTE(Milton Roe @ Tue 27th April 2010, 5:28pm)
QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Tue 27th April 2010, 4:47pm)
Just FYI, Milton: your present avatar photo contains a small detail (actually two of them) that you probably don't know about:
it contains two Roland D-50s. A massively popular keyboard, despite endless complaints about its "bad sound". And still used by thousands of bad bar bands the world over, because nobody with taste or discernment wants old D-50s. Making them dirt cheap to buy on the used market.
Yes, I looked it up. Indeed the '57 Chevy of electric keyboards. Dunno if the guitar is a Fender. I think they should have given LHO a halfstand mic ala Freddie Mercury. It's not as though they tried to do everything in period, as the keyboard is post-1987.
This is great! I had the same reaction - I remember the D-50 from backinnaday. If memory serves, this was at the intersection of analog and digital (at least at a realistic price point), so it seemed a big deal at the time. But they were mostly immune to programming, unlike my beloved Kawaii (so cute!) with its sliders and dials. Alas, they were as ephemeral as the big hair of them what liked them.
Posted by: Jon Awbrey
â—„ Wikipedia â–º Hypocrisy So Predictable It's Almost Comforting
Posted by: Milton Roe
â—„ Wikipedia â–º Just 15 Minutes Can Add 15 Points To Your Blood Pressure
â—„ Wikipedia â–º It's Like the Government: the More You Know About It, the Angrier You Get
â—„ Wikipedia â–º By Now It Can't Help But Exceed MY Expectations
â—„ Wikipedia â–º I'd Like to Have an Argument With an Asperger Person, Please
Posted by: Milton Roe
Thanks for that Template, Jon.
â—„ Wikipedia â–º Where Teens are Shocked at the Incivility of Seniors Who Observe That They
DON'T KNOW SHIT
Posted by: Cock-up-over-conspiracy
QUOTE(Milton Roe @ Wed 28th April 2010, 12:28am)
Yes, I looked it up. Indeed the '57 Chevy of electric keyboards.
Wikipedia: no one got laid because they edit the Wikipedia (except Jimbo).
Posted by: powercorrupts
Wikipedia: Where your inherent ability to effortlessly switch between impersonating a tearful victim and a stern school teacher, and to kiss every passing admin's ass, will soon lead to the offer of controlling other editors without recall. No questions asked, no paperwork needed:
Wikipedia: Become a content controller! No minimum age or ability required: just show us what a slimy little shit you are.
Wikipedia: Would you like to live in a world that believes we are all fundamentally honest, and where expression of faith in our belief is justly rewarded? And where persecution of our beliefs are simply not tolerated? Experience a Wikipedia Welcome, and join us in creating a perfect world.
Wikipedia: Evil vs Good
Posted by: RDH(Ghost In The Machine)
QUOTE(powercorrupts @ Thu 29th April 2010, 10:05am)
Wikipedia: Evil vs Good
Wikipedia: Left is right, down is up and evil IS good.
Wikipedia: Just like Uranus-no signs of intelligent life.
Posted by: Milton Roe
â—„ Wikipedia â–º Where We Must Assume Good Faith Against All Evidence of Bad Faith
(unless of course Jimbo decides it's trolling)
[/quote]
Posted by: Jon Awbrey
â—„ Wikipedia â–º Publicly Traded Laughing Stock Accept No Derivatives
Posted by: Milton Roe
Good, good. Maybe even:
â—„ Wikipedia â–º Publicly Traded Laughing Stock with No Equity
Invest Yourself with No Return
Posted by: EricBarbour
Posted by: Cock-up-over-conspiracy
Wikipedia: the Lolicon of Encyclopedias ...
We like kids!!! We need them to run our business!!!
Posted by: Zoloft
Wikipedia: Where Murphy's Law has no teeth.
Posted by: Jon Awbrey
We seem to have reached a strong consensus on the Official Skool Colors of Wikipedia —
QUOTE
Go Fire-Brick !!!
Go Olive-Drab !!!
Posted by: Cock-up-over-conspiracy
Wikipedia: the only encyclopedia which attempts to document of all human sexual activity, not merely the human sexual activity which people find tolerable. ... as per Erik Moeller
Posted by: Moulton
Wikipedia: The Scum of all Human Trollage.
Posted by: Cock-up-over-conspiracy
Wikipedia:images of http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=29404&st=0&gopid=233978entry233978 are educational & suitable for unlimited access by children. ... attributed to the Mediawiki Foundation courtesy of http://www.netdemocracyguide.net/speech/cda/950724godwin.html
You may "Never see a nipple in the Daily Express" ... but Jimmy Wales does spunky dicks'n'gaping vaginas. ... credit to http://lyrics.wikia.com/John_Cooper_Clarke:Daily_Express_(You_Never_See_A_Nipple_In) for those whose English ability requires subtitles
(Ripe for a parody, I'd say).
Posted by: Jon Awbrey
QUOTE
â—„ Wiki-Pamplona â–º
¡ Come for the Running of the Bull !
¡ Stay for the Goring of the Dox !
Posted by: RDH(Ghost In The Machine)
Wikipedia: Not censored (unless our glorious "founder" feels a fire under his fanny).
'On the Banning of Co-Founder Larry Sanger from the Wikipedia', by an anonymous editor named after the British comedian and puppeteer 'http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sqrg_VCPgAQ', following the ongoing amateur hard core porn controversy reported by Fox News, (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#Proposed_community_ban_on_LS).
Wikipedia: When you're in a hole, start fisting!... http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5b/Wiki-fisting.png
Wikipedia: the monster that chews up its founders and spits them out.
Posted by: Jon Awbrey
QUOTE
â—„ Wiki-Plebiscite â–º Bare Abbess !!! Bare Abbess !!! Bare Abbess !!!
Posted by: Moulton
That's pretty obscure, Jon. Sure Milton and Ottava will get it. And probably Somey, too.
But I fear your New Testament reference will be lost on a lot of people here.
Posted by: Jon Awbrey
QUOTE(Moulton @ Tue 11th May 2010, 6:15am)
That's pretty obscure, Jon. Sure Milton and Ottava will get it. And probably Somey, too.
But I fear your New Testament reference will be lost on a lot of people here.
Yes, a bit of a stretch, but I knew the wag who tagged Pompous Pilot would cache on tuit. I didn't check to see if she really was an abbess, but I figured a posthumous promotion would be politer than indistreetly screaming “Nude Nun !!! Nude Nun !!!â€