The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> Discussions in this subforum are hidden from search engines.

However, they are not hidden from automobile engines, including the newer, more "environmentally-friendly" electric and hybrid engines. Also, please note that this subforum is meant to be used for discussion of the actual biographical articles themselves; more generalized discussions of BLP policy should be posted in the General Discussion or Bureaucracy forums.

Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Dominique Strauss-Kahn, more stupidity on planet Wiki
Peter Damian
post Tue 17th May 2011, 4:29pm
Post #1

I have as much free time as a Wikipedia admin!

Group: Regulars
Posts: 4,400
Joined: Tue 18th Dec 2007, 9:25pm
Member No.: 4,212

WP user page - talk
check - contribs

The article is dominated by two schools of thought. One is that the word 'sodomised' absolutely must at all cost be included in the details of the charge . Wikipedians particularly like the fact that you can link this word to other vile articles.

The other, almost entirely opposed, is that the charges are a complete frame-up and illustrate the penal and excessive nature of the US judicial system .

Obviously there is no middle ground of any kind between these two polar opinions.

There is another division between those who want all these important facts in the introduction to the article, and those who don't.

The talk page is entertaining. At least Strauss-Kahn presumably is unable to read any of this right now.

This post has been edited by Peter Damian: Tue 17th May 2011, 4:42pm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
3 User(s) are reading this topic (3 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:


-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 24th 2 18, 2:32am