The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> Help

This forum is for discussing specific Wikipedia editors, editing patterns, and general efforts by those editors to influence or direct content in ways that might not be in keeping with Wikipedia policy. Please source your claims and provide links where appropriate. For a glossary of terms frequently used when discussing Wikipedia and related projects, please refer to Wikipedia:Glossary.

 
Closed TopicStart new topic
> I never knew MONGO to be a bald-faced liar, Until my RFAr
FNORD23
post Sun 1st April 2007, 2:50am
Post #1


Member
***

Group: Contributors
Posts: 231
Joined: Sun 5th Nov 2006, 5:18am
Member No.: 520

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



Here's what I wrote on his userpage after I was unblocked, before my ban for a year went into effect. MONGO never addressed it.

Hi Mongo - Back from my 10 day block (don't know for how long !;-) I am extremely disappointed that you would post the following inaccurate and untrue claim about me, Mongo.

: "My repayment for being overly fair was to have him attack me every chance he could, simply because I wouldn't agree with his POV pushing of conspiracy theories on the 9/11 articles".--MONGO 07:57, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

I doubt that I have over 100 edits total (between this account and my previous NBGPWS account) on any 9/11 related articles, and at least half of those were to 2 articles I created on The Hologram Theory, which I stated I did not believe in, but felt the sheer preposterousness made it notable enough to be documented. When I did briefly become involved in a couple of the 9/11 articles, (way too contentious for me to stay involved!) I made it 100% clear that I did not believe in any of the 9/11 conspiracy theories, but felt that Wiki should treat the subject and its proponents no differently than Wiki treats those who believe in, and are active on the Wiki articles concerning Young Earth Creation, Flood Geography, 'Alternate Theories of the Plame Affair' or 'The Saddam and al Qaeda Timeline'. Your claim was baseless and untruthful. I trust it won't be repeated. Thanks - FaAfA Aloha 22:59, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

He deleted it with the edit summary 'Get Lost' and refused to address it in the RFAr.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
LamontStormstar
post Sun 1st April 2007, 6:57am
Post #2


Postmaster
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,359
Joined: Fri 18th Aug 2006, 7:25am
Member No.: 342

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



MONGO seems to be just against 9/11 conspiracy theories.

The other ones like Bigfoot, JFK being a government conspiracy, the extra terrestrials being on earth and secretly involved with the United States government, crop circles, fluoride in the drinking water as a mind control agent, majestic 12, that George W. Bush may actually be an alien, the secret government work by a man known as Felix Leiter, etc. MONGO doesn't mind. He only cares about 9/11 issues.

This post has been edited by LamontStormstar: Sun 1st April 2007, 6:59am
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
FNORD23
post Sun 1st April 2007, 8:09am
Post #3


Member
***

Group: Contributors
Posts: 231
Joined: Sun 5th Nov 2006, 5:18am
Member No.: 520

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(LamontStormstar @ Sat 31st March 2007, 11:57pm) *

MONGO seems to be just against 9/11 conspiracy theories.

The other ones like Bigfoot, JFK being a government conspiracy, the extra terrestrials being on earth and secretly involved with the United States government, crop circles, fluoride in the drinking water as a mind control agent, majestic 12, that George W. Bush may actually be an alien, the secret government work by a man known as Felix Leiter, etc. MONGO doesn't mind. He only cares about 9/11 issues.


Considering he has a degree in Geology, you'd think he'd have a least a passing interest in the 6000 year old earthers, Noahic flood 'geologists' and the other creation conspiracy theorists and their attempts to introduce their CT's into scientific articles - but he cares not a whit. Possibly because they support his personal demigod gw bush as much as he does?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Closed TopicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 24th 5 13, 10:12am