I'll quote his comments there:
QUOTE
Delete snackcruft. I cannot imagine how this could be expanded except by adding the most trivial of details. They're just Japanese tortilla chips, basically. --Calton | Talk 13:15, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
QUOTE
I count 225 unique hits. Where did this "32,000" number come from? --Calton | Talk 05:20, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
QUOTE
225 unique hits, according to Google. --Calton | Talk 05:20, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
QUOTE
That they have 146,849 articles, and yet somehow managed to overlook this particular snack food. I wonder why? --Calton | Talk 05:20, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
QUOTE
Why look, THAT article is up for deletion also. And the fact that you added it to the Japanese Wikipedia means nothing -- hell, it means less than nothing; having to gin up a rationale doesn't exactly help your case. --Calton | Talk 06:21, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
QUOTE
Buh? That was the biggest load of non-sequitor I've seen all month. To quote Wolfgang Pauli, "That's not right; that's not even wrong." So your false dichotomy is EVERYTHING is culturally significant or NOTHING is culturally significant? Because that's the only meaning that makes even the tiniest shred of sense in that context. --Calton | Talk 06:21, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
Of course, in quoting all of this (from the same AFD), that is pretty typical behaviour from people in AFDs. He is harassing others, insulting others, being arrogant and sarcastic, but that's pretty much how everyone behaves in AFDs. AFDs are the cesspool of Wikipedia, where personal attacks and insults are not only permitted, they are encouraged.