|
Help
This forum is for discussing specific Wikipedia editors, editing patterns, and general efforts by those editors to influence or direct content in ways that might not be in keeping with Wikipedia policy. Please source your claims and provide links where appropriate. For a glossary of terms frequently used when discussing Wikipedia and related projects, please refer to Wikipedia:Glossary.
|
|
Iridescent, Who is he |
|
|
RMHED |
|
Ãœber Member
Group: Regulars
Posts: 936
Joined:
Member No.: 11,716
|
QUOTE(MZMcBride @ Sun 26th June 2011, 9:13pm) QUOTE(RMHED @ Sun 26th June 2011, 3:40pm) It's always nice to be right.You're a modern-day Nostradamus. Thank you. It was pretty impressive wasn't it.* * Please note RMHED has had a sarcasm detection bypass.
|
|
|
|
Theanima |
|
Member
Group: Contributors
Posts: 222
Joined:
Member No.: 18,566
|
QUOTE(Peter Damian @ Sun 26th June 2011, 8:45pm) QUOTE(Theanima @ Sun 26th June 2011, 8:31pm) AFAIK he/she/it is an American (possibly from New York) aged approximately 35 currently living in London, possibly working for the metropolitan police. With an interest in railways, people with eating disorders, graveyards and parks amongst other things.
That was exactly my impression, even down to the age. But the question was, do many people get PMs from this person? Why do you ask? What would that tell you?
|
|
|
|
Ceoil |
|
Junior Member
Group: Contributors
Posts: 56
Joined:
Member No.: 8,131
|
QUOTE(Ceoil @ Sun 26th June 2011, 10:42pm) This thread is beneeth contempt. Its actually sad, and a bit frightening.
Iridescent is so obviouly a good, together, well judged person, I'm amazed that this was opened. I doubt that there is a score bing settled, it probably just a general random nastly, whatever.
|
|
|
|
Malleus |
|
Fat Cat
Group: Contributors
Posts: 1,682
Joined:
From: United Kingdom
Member No.: 8,716
|
QUOTE(Ceoil @ Sun 26th June 2011, 11:40pm) QUOTE(Ceoil @ Sun 26th June 2011, 10:42pm) This thread is beneeth contempt. Its actually sad, and a bit frightening.
Iridescent is so obviouly a good, together, well judged person, I'm amazed that this was opened. I doubt that there is a score bing settled, it probably just a general random nastly, whatever. I think there are many unexplained aspects of this series of leaks. Not least of which is that given all the juicy stuff that's subsequently been posted why did it begin with a rather uninteresting exchange of emails between Iridescent and me? This post has been edited by Malleus:
|
|
|
|
gomi |
|
Member
Group: Members
Posts: 3,022
Joined:
Member No.: 565
|
QUOTE(Ceoil @ Sun 26th June 2011, 5:29pm) The leaker seems young and stupid, not very collected, not able to tell the value of what he had access to. So its all bland. The daily by-product of any bureaucracy is bound to be bland -- that is the nature of bureaucracies. Try reading the Congressional Register some time. The gold isn't in big nuggets, it is dust scattered hither and yon, and it takes correlation to dig it out. Malice isn't solving a problem for us, he/she is posing one, which it is up to us to solve. It has already been said (on Wikipedia) that this will ultimately provide a "sympathy backlash" for ArbCom, and that may be true. So far, the evidence is that they are occasionally rude, they are cavalier in making secret decisions, but in comparatively clear-cut cases, but other than revealing (yet another) Wikipedia Secret Society, there isn't much that most of us didn't know. That said, there is more to come, so stay tuned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| |