Funny, Hipocrite learns of that discussion from this thread, goes and votes, then
accuses everyone else of vote stacking! I assume he included Mathsci in that accusation, since Mathsci also participated in this thread.
One of the funniest things about editors making accusations like that, apart from the lack of self-awareness, is that they apparently don't realize that posting something on Wikipedia Review usually attracts
just as many, if not more editors who support their side than against. This is because activist editors watch this site like hawks, because their lives revolve around safeguarding the "truth" that they have edited into Wikipedia and intend to keep there. Will Beback, for example, apparently keeps a running library of links to posts on this site, because he often pulls them out and throws them around whenever his editing undergoes uncomfortable scrutiny.
This post has been edited by Cla68: