QUOTE(The Joy @ Mon 30th January 2012, 9:52am)
Raul654Â
(T-C-L-K-R-D)
provides an ominous warning to those seeking an alternative to the FA process:
QUOTE
Re:
Another approach would be to assign FA status outside their process. - such behavior will not be tolerated. Consider yourself warned. Raul654 (talk) 20:25, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=473570981 (IMG:
smilys0b23ax56/default/blink.gif)
Raul
wants to be the FA dictator-for-life and he's going to pummel anyone that tries to take power away from him. I can't believe he's allowed to get away with that kind of behavior. Who on earth would want to write an FA dealing with jerks like him? (IMG:
smilys0b23ax56/default/dry.gif) (IMG:
smilys0b23ax56/default/hrmph.gif)
Actually, when it comes to dealing with FA-related stuff, I've never had a problem with Raul. It's the other areas where he causes problems, such as range blocking an entire university to try to shut-out a banned global warming sceptic, calling me and Jayen "liars" for certifying an RfC on Cirt, backing-up the ID-Cab (which, to be fair, he hasn't done in awhile), and disparaging Wikipedia Review and the people who participate here.