Options

[mbz1]

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=482944579

How to figure out improvements in process that lower the number of inappropriate blocks, and increase the number of appropriate blocks, is tricky business!--[[User:Jimbo Wales|Jimbo Wales]] ([[User talk:Jimbo Wales#top|talk]]) 18:39, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Well, I am not going to discuss how to increase " the number of appropriate blocks", but lowering the number of inappropriate blocks is very easy.

Of course an admin could impose an inappropriate block by mistake, and it could be understood, but there are some situation, in which "mistakes" could be easily avoided, and that's why should not be forgiven.

1. An admin misuses its tools while involved broadly construed

2. An admin blocks a well established editor with an idiotic edit summary as for example "vandalism only account".

3. An admin misuses the tools to bully kids.

In the above situations, a first misuse of the tools should warrant a firm warning, and a second should result in desysoping.

Another way to lower " the number of inappropriate blocks" is to make sure that each and every block rationale is supported by at least one difference, and the more complex the situation is the more differences should be presented.

Another way to lower " the number of inappropriate blocks" is to make sure that during mob lynching on AN/I only uninvolved users are allowed to comment about the block.


Another way to lower " the number of inappropriate blocks" is to allow an editor in question to freely participate in all discussions concerning his/her block.

Another way to lower " the number of inappropriate blocks" is to stop closed tribunals by your arbcom, at least in the cases, where no private info of a third party is involved. Then the members of arbcom and you, Jimbo, would not be afraid that your private communications will get leaked some time some where.

Another way to lower " the number of inappropriate blocks" is strictly follow your own blocking policy: blocks should not be punitive!

I assure you, Jimbo, that these absolutely valid and fair measure that are really easy to implement will drastically lower the numbers of inappropriate blocks.

Just remember, Jimbo, if you care of course, it is much easier to replace a bully, power-hungry admin, and each and every sicko from you arbcom than a valued contributor.

This post has been edited by mbz1:

[Tarc]

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=482944579

How to figure out improvements in process that lower the number of inappropriate blocks, and increase the number of appropriate blocks, is tricky business!--[[User:Jimbo Wales|Jimbo Wales]] ([[User talk:Jimbo Wales#top|talk]]) 18:39, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Well, I am not going to discuss how to increase " the number of appropriate blocks", but lowering the number of inappropriate blocks is very easy.

Of course an admin could impose an inappropriate block by mistake, and it could be understood, but there are some situation, in which "mistakes" could be easily avoided, and that's why should not be forgiven.

1. An admin misuses its tools while involved broadly construed

2. An admin blocks a well established editor with an idiotic edit summary as for example "vandalism only account".

3. An admin misuses the tools to bully kids.

In the above situations, a first misuse of the tools should warrant a firm warning, and a second should result in desysoping.

Another way to lower " the number of inappropriate blocks" is to make sure that each and every block rationale is supported by at least one difference, and the more complex the situation is the more differences should be presented.

Another way to lower " the number of inappropriate blocks" is to make sure that during mob lynching on AN/I only uninvolved users are allowed to comment about the block.


Another way to lower " the number of inappropriate blocks" is to allow an editor in question to freely participate in all discussions concerning his/her block.

Another way to lower " the number of inappropriate blocks" is strictly follow your own blocking policy: blocks should not be punitive!

I assure you, Jimbo, that these absolutely valid and fair measure that are really easy to implement will drastically lower the numbers of inappropriate blocks.

Just remember, Jimbo, if you care of course, it is much easier to replace a bully, power-hungry admin, and each and every sicko from you arbcom than a valued contributor.

Btw Mila, you should probably ask the Commons admins to delete the various "Yyxx?" --> "Mbz1" redirects, as it makes your vanishing/departure/whatever kinda obvious.

[Alison]

Btw Mila, you should probably ask the Commons admins to delete the various "Yyxx?" --> "Mbz1" redirects, as it makes your vanishing/departure/whatever kinda obvious.

Just link me the redirects in email and I'll nuke 'em all, ok? (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/smile.gif) I've not been following any of this, to be honest.

[mbz1]

Btw Mila, you should probably ask the Commons admins to delete the various "Yyxx?" --> "Mbz1" redirects, as it makes your vanishing/departure/whatever kinda obvious.

Just link me the redirects in email and I'll nuke 'em all, ok? (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/smile.gif) I've not been following any of this, to be honest.

Thanks for your kind offer, Alison. It has been done already.
BTW tarc post reminded me yet another Russian joke.

In Soviet Union everybody had passports since they were 16 years old. Passports were required to get a library cards, to go to hospitals, to get employment, to get to a college... everywhere...
Also there was so called goverment antisemitism in Russia. It was much harder for a Jew to find an employment (all Russian companies belonged to goverment).

So here's a joke:

Rabinovich comes to a passport's agency and requests to change his last name to Ivanov.
An agent changed the name, and gave him a new passport.
In a month Rabinovich is back. Now he requests to change his last name to Petrov.
An agent looks at his passport, and asks: "Listen what is the difference between "Petrov" and "Ivanov". Rabinovich responds: "Yes, right, except, if somebody would ask me who I was before I became Petrov, I would say I was Ivanov." (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/tongue.gif)

Maybe I also should request another name change, in case somebody will ask me who I was before I became Yyxx? (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/smile.gif)

On the other hand it is rather sad that there so much in common between totalitarian communist regime and regime of wikipedia.

This post has been edited by mbz1:

[Tarc]

BTW tarc post reminded me yet another Russian joke.

Unless it is either Yakov Smirnoff (T-H-L-K-D) or overused memes, Russian humor really doesn't strike the American funny bone, y'know.

This post has been edited by Tarc: