FORUM WARNING [2] Division by zero (Line: 2933 of /srcsgcaop/boardclass.php)
Coren's retired -
     
 
The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> Coren's retired
Nerd
post
Post #1


Ãœber Member
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 672
Joined:
From: Cloud cuckoo land
Member No.: 11,945



Seems Coren has retired. He has moved himself to the former arbitrator list, but has yet to actually give up adminship, checkuser and oversight. Wonder what's up with him.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
MBisanz
post
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 478
Joined:
Member No.: 5,693



QUOTE(Nerd @ Mon 6th July 2009, 2:25pm) *

Seems Coren has retired. He has moved himself to the former arbitrator list, but has yet to actually give up adminship, checkuser and oversight. Wonder what's up with him.


To the best of my knowledge, there is no policy that even encourages resigning arbs to give up checkuser and oversight. And seeing as adminship is granted in a separate process from arbcom, I don't know why he would give it up. It would be like saying that if someone who is on MedCom and BAG resigns from MedCom, they also should resign from BAG.

Oh and of the arbs to leave since Jan 2008,
UninvitedCompany - Kept
YellowMonkey - Kept
Jpgordon - Kept
Jdforrester - Kept
Sam Blacketer - Didn't keep
Charles Matthews - Didn't keep
Morven - Didn't keep
FT2 - Kept
Paul August - Didn't keep
Deskana - Kept

This post has been edited by MBisanz:
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
taiwopanfob
post
Post #3


Ãœber Member
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 643
Joined:
Member No.: 214



QUOTE(MBisanz @ Mon 6th July 2009, 1:56pm) *
To the best of my knowledge, there is no policy that even encourages resigning arbs to give up checkuser and oversight.


There should be. Being on ArbCom should mean prompt removal of these privileges as a matter of course. The real-life analogy should be obvious: the job description of judges does not include issuing tickets, arresting people or carrying guns.

Only after an illustrious career on the committee said privs can be restored in some magnificent ceremony of pure light.

Or perhaps they can just re-apply for the bit(s), letting their good deeds and selfless service do the talking.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Castle Rock
post
Post #4


Senior Member
****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 358
Joined:
From: Oregon
Member No.: 3,051



QUOTE(taiwopanfob @ Mon 6th July 2009, 8:30pm) *

There should be. Being on ArbCom should mean prompt removal of these privileges as a matter of course. The real-life analogy should be obvious: the job description of judges does not include issuing tickets, arresting people or carrying guns.


I believe the ArbCom is more styled after the Judge Dredd form of justice.


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Milton Roe
post
Post #5


Known alias of J. Random Troll
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,209
Joined:
Member No.: 5,156



QUOTE(Castle Rock @ Mon 6th July 2009, 11:24pm) *

I believe the ArbCom is more styled after the Judge Dredd form of justice.

Cognitive dissonance is when somebody nicknamed Cool Hand Luke has to change his tagline to "I am de rrrraaahhhh!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now:
 
     
FORUM WARNING [2] Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/wikipede/public_html/int042kj398.php:242) (Line: 0 of Unknown)