Posted by: Shalom
My sockpuppet Throwaway666Â (T-C-L-K-R-D)
was blocked by Sandstein as a sockpuppet of a banned user.
HEY SANDSTEIN! I'M NOT BANNED! (yet).
Posted by: EricBarbour
So, what did you http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Throwaway666 on that AFD that pissed him off?
Posted by: Shalom
QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Wed 16th May 2012, 6:53pm)
So, what did you http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Throwaway666 on that AFD that pissed him off?
The edit summary was "Majorly's real name is Alex Newman." By the way, I have another sockpuppet which put something similar in another edit summary and it wasn't oversighted, but I don't think I can track it down.
Posted by: The Joy
QUOTE(Shalom @ Wed 16th May 2012, 5:14pm)
My sockpuppet
Throwaway666Â
(T-C-L-K-R-D)
was blocked by Sandstein as a sockpuppet of a banned user.
HEY SANDSTEIN! I'M NOT BANNED! (yet).
You are now.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&user=Raul654&page=Shalom+Yechiel&year=&month=-1&tagfilter=&hide_patrol_log=1&hide_review_log=1
Posted by: The Joy
QUOTE(Shalom @ Wed 16th May 2012, 7:31pm)
QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Wed 16th May 2012, 6:53pm)
So, what did you http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Throwaway666 on that AFD that pissed him off?
The edit summary was "Majorly's real name is Alex Newman." By the way, I have another sockpuppet which put something similar in another edit summary and it wasn't oversighted, but I don't think I can track it down.
He used to sign his name "Alex" on Wikipedia. Is he trying to pull a Fae?
http://www.mail-archive.com/wikimediameta-l@lists.wikimedia.org/msg00037.html
http://www.archivum.info/wikien-l@lists.wikimedia.org/2008-05/00125/Re-%28WikiEN-l%29-Durova%27s-real-name.html
He's been using his real name and associating it with his Wikipedia name for
years. What's changed?
Posted by: Michaeldsuarez
QUOTE(The Joy @ Wed 16th May 2012, 10:13pm)
QUOTE(Shalom @ Wed 16th May 2012, 5:14pm)
My sockpuppet
Throwaway666Â
(T-C-L-K-R-D)
was blocked by Sandstein as a sockpuppet of a banned user.
HEY SANDSTEIN! I'M NOT BANNED! (yet).
You are now.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&user=Raul654&page=Shalom+Yechiel&year=&month=-1&tagfilter=&hide_patrol_log=1&hide_review_log=1
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&page=User%3AChutznik:
QUOTE
Self-admitted violation of [[Wikipedia:OUTING]] - http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=37786&pid=305001&st=0entry305001
Raul654 linked to a thread containing the information involved in the "outing". Anyone who's curious about why Chutznik was blocked will find their way here and see the information.
Posted by: EricBarbour
Nice work, dude! Being blocked by Raul The Mighty Blubber, that puts you into an elite group!
Posted by: The Joy
QUOTE(Michaeldsuarez @ Wed 16th May 2012, 10:52pm)
QUOTE(The Joy @ Wed 16th May 2012, 10:13pm)
QUOTE(Shalom @ Wed 16th May 2012, 5:14pm)
My sockpuppet
Throwaway666Â
(T-C-L-K-R-D)
was blocked by Sandstein as a sockpuppet of a banned user.
HEY SANDSTEIN! I'M NOT BANNED! (yet).
You are now.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&user=Raul654&page=Shalom+Yechiel&year=&month=-1&tagfilter=&hide_patrol_log=1&hide_review_log=1
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&page=User%3AChutznik:
QUOTE
Self-admitted violation of [[Wikipedia:OUTING]] - http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=37786&pid=305001&st=0entry305001
Raul654 linked to a thread containing the information involved in the "outing". Anyone who's curious about why Chutznik was blocked will find their way here and see the information.
Which means Raul just outed Majorly
again and in
an edit summary.
Of course, Raul could say "Hey! I did it on purpose to prove a point about BADSITES and CLEANSTART (i.e. Fae) being stupid, especially when there is public information out there that make doing a CLEANSTART stupid!" In which case, Raul is a
rebel on the side of justice violating WP:POINT and utilizing irony with common sense.
Or maybe he's not the sharpest tool in the drawer?
Edit: Ah, he or someone else must have seen it. The edit summary is over-sighted. Too late, though.
Posted by: Shalom
Sweet. No regrets.
I have a sleeper sock with more than 100 edits who was not blocked. Raul? Your move!
Posted by: Shalom
Let the checkuser begin. I'm half tempted to spare them the trouble and spill the beans here, but I will make them work for this one time.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Chutznik
Posted by: Text
QUOTE
Let the checkuser begin. I'm half tempted to spare them the trouble and spill the beans here, but I will make them work for this one time.
>implying anyone will care
Posted by: Shalom
QUOTE(Alison @ Sun 20th May 2012, 6:57pm)
The drama has died down on ANI. Now I'm indef-blocked but not banned, which seems not to make any difference. I was celebrating the fact that I got banned (it was either that or adminship I wanted, and getting banned is easier) but then I saw everyone opposing the ban and thought "Darn!" But more socking is unlikely to change the status quo.
Posted by: Seddon
QUOTE(Alison @ Sun 20th May 2012, 11:57pm)
I genuinely thought this was public knowledge..... waste of a sock that was
Posted by: Shalom
QUOTE(Seddon @ Sun 20th May 2012, 8:10pm)
QUOTE(Alison @ Sun 20th May 2012, 11:57pm)
I genuinely thought this was public knowledge..... waste of a sock that was
It was an experiment to see how trigger happy the admins were. I won and lost simultaneously.