QUOTE(dogbiscuit @ Wed 11th January 2012, 12:32pm)
Greg, I guess you'd take issue with this Jimbo "fact" in the context of paid editing:
QUOTE
And yes, I think it would be valuable to have specific examples. I have never - not even once - been shown an example where someone did things according to my recommendations and they did not get a proper resolution.
There is a wonderful weaselliness about those qualifications, isn't there?
Essentially any time Jimbo is moving his lips or typing on his keyboard, I take issue.
(IMG:
smilys0b23ax56/default/evilgrin.gif)
I guess he's forgotten entirely about Arch Coal, which was the grand-daddy of article process following his recommendations exactly. The result? An out-of-process deletion, a restoration that had been plagiarized by an admin without attribution, protection of the admin who plagiarized, and a two-year refusal to apologize for the disgraceful outcome.
QUOTE(TungstenCarbide @ Wed 11th January 2012, 12:42pm)
Are you a member of the CREWE Group on facebook?
He is. His Facebook name is "Sterling Ericsson".
This post has been edited by thekohser: