Ironic statement of the year:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=287681189QUOTE
I would add to that, if this passes, get ready for some extra stress on the checkuser process... and for a general decrease in "trust" (in an area where trust is already difficult to come by), because checkuser cannot always produce a solid conclusion. If such a large number of active editors are banned from this large topic area, I predict that every "new" editor who shows up in this area will be suspected, by someone, of being a sockpuppet of one of the banned users. And quite possibly, some will be, but most won't be. It won't matter. The opportunities for neo-[[McCarthyism|McCarthyist]] hysteria on Wikipedia are mind-boggling. People will be seeing sockpuppets under every bed and around every corner. [[User:6SJ7|6SJ7]] ([[User talk:6SJ7|talk]]) 18:17, 3 May 2009 (UTC)-
So 6SJ7 is warning that the consequence of Jay and others being sanctioned is a Mcarthyist witch hunt using CheckUser? I'm amazed 6SJ7 could say this without the least hint of irony given that that's exactly how Jayjg has been using Checkuser for years.
And do I read a suggestion there that Jayjg might sockpuppet to evade his topic ban?