Ottava's slime returns Options

[Web Fred]

It looks like our little pal Ottava is using his trademark sliminess to try and use emotional blackmail to get his Commons account back.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ottava_Rima

...and...

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:...ser:Ottava_Rima

Makes one want to puke (and not just in the passive sense).

[GlassBeadGame]

It looks like our little pal Ottava is using his trademark sliminess to try and use emotional blackmail to get his Commons account back.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ottava_Rima

...and...

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:...ser:Ottava_Rima

Makes one want to puke (and not just in the passive sense).

God, you really are a nerd-ass Wikipedian, aren't you?. Well, keep us posted on how this turn out because we really care.

[Somey]

Well, keep us posted on how this turn out because we really care.

Or, better yet... (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/tongue.gif)

But in case anyone is still reading this stuff, Mr. Fred here is pro-porn, while Mr. Ottava is decidedly anti-porn. So, naturally, there is conflict. Unfortunately, Ottava's strident and divisive denunciations of everyone who opposes him have made him persona non grata in most of the venues where Wikipedia issues are discussed, including this one, so his only remaining option is to apologize (however sincerely or insincerely, though I suspect sincerity matters little to the average Commons admin) and hope they take him back.

However silly and petty the whole business ultimately is, they would be wise not to underestimate him. Many of them claim that he can be "easily reblocked," and therefore there would be little harm in what's being suggested. But while that might be true from a purely technical standpoint, from an internal-political standpoint it's simply not the case.

[Web Fred]

Mr. Fred here is pro-porn

I am neither pro porn or anti porn. What I am anti is low quality photography.

If there are going to be naked people or intimate shots of naked people doing pleasurable things to themselves or others then I believe they should be good quality.

I also don't believe that pictures of naked people (real or otherwise) is necessarily "porn".

I also detest middle America's fear of prurience, hedonism and sex.

Does that make my viewpoint clearer for you?

[TungstenCarbide]

... I also detest middle America's fear of prurience, hedonism and sex...

Have you spent any significant time in middle America? Or are you just confusing your bigoted misinformed mindset with reality?

This post has been edited by TungstenCarbide:

[Web Fred]

... I also detest middle America's fear of prurience, hedonism and sex...

Have you spent any significant time in middle America? Or are you just confusing your bigoted misinformed mindset with reality?

Thanks for asking, but I have enough practical experience of the 'bible belt' to form a justified conclusion.

Ah, this is more like it. This is classic full-blooded WR.

Look, Ottava is not even a blot on the WMF scene. He is utterly and spectacularly insignificant. Why on Earth should anyone here waste time writing about him?

To create a thread that has fuck all to do with Mo the Qu'ran librarian.

Myself, I won't be satisfied until the last nerd on WR is hung by entrails of the last Wikipedian. I suspect this will occur sometime around September. Too bad just about nobody will be around to share this happy occasion.

I far prefer being a nerd to your performance as a paranoid fuckwit.

Enjoy your bad hygiene and social deficits.

I will thanks, but now I will let you get back to your crayon drawings.

[GlassBeadGame]

... I also detest middle America's fear of prurience, hedonism and sex...

Have you spent any significant time in middle America? Or are you just confusing your bigoted misinformed mindset with reality?

Thanks for asking, but I have enough practical experience of the 'bible belt' to form a justified conclusion.

Ah, this is more like it. This is classic full-blooded WR.

Look, Ottava is not even a blot on the WMF scene. He is utterly and spectacularly insignificant. Why on Earth should anyone here waste time writing about him?

To create a thread that has fuck all to do with Mo the Qu'ran librarian.

Myself, I won't be satisfied until the last nerd on WR is hung by entrails of the last Wikipedian. I suspect this will occur sometime around September. Too bad just about nobody will be around to share this happy occasion.

I far prefer being a nerd to your performance as a paranoid fuckwit.

Enjoy your bad hygiene and social deficits.

I will thanks, but now I will let you get back to your crayon drawings.

You might respond in a more cutting and effective manner but that is probably the best your nerd neurology will allow.

[Web Fred]

You might respond in a more cutting and effective manner but that is probably the best your nerd neurology will allow.

As opposed to over-quoting and the inability to prevent it?