FORUM WARNING [2] Division by zero (Line: 2933 of /srcsgcaop/boardclass.php)
World's foremost WP & WMF critics -
     
 
The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> General Discussion? What's that all about?

This subforum is for general discussion of Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects. For a glossary of terms frequently used in such discussions, please refer to Wikipedia:Glossary. For a glossary of musical terms, see here. Other useful links:

Akahele.orgWikipedia-WatchWikitruthWP:ANWikiEN-L/Foundation-L (mailing lists) • Citizendium forums

> World's foremost WP & WMF critics
Rating  2
Vote for the critics
Who is the world's foremost critic of Wikipedia?
Jon Awbrey [ 2 ] ** [4.76%]
Daniel Brandt [ 5 ] ** [11.90%]
Stephen Colbert [ 5 ] ** [11.90%]
Seth Finkelstein [ 2 ] ** [4.76%]
Joe Hazelton [ 1 ] ** [2.38%]
Carl Hewitt [ 0 ] ** [0.00%]
Oliver Kamm [ 0 ] ** [0.00%]
Andrew Keen [ 3 ] ** [7.14%]
Gregory Kohs [ 4 ] ** [9.52%]
Barry Kort [ 3 ] ** [7.14%]
Jaron Lanier [ 0 ] ** [0.00%]
Rachel Marsden [ 1 ] ** [2.38%]
Kelly Martin [ 4 ] ** [9.52%]
Cade Metz [ 1 ] ** [2.38%]
Larry Sanger [ 8 ] ** [19.05%]
Stacy Schiff [ 0 ] ** [0.00%]
John Seigenthaler [ 0 ] ** [0.00%]
Owen Thomas [ 0 ] ** [0.00%]
Other not listed (please cite your selection in a post) [ 3 ] ** [7.14%]
Who is the world's foremost critic of the Wikimedia Foundation?
Jon Awbrey [ 1 ] ** [2.38%]
Daniel Brandt [ 6 ] ** [14.29%]
Stephen Colbert [ 0 ] ** [0.00%]
Seth Finkelstein [ 11 ] ** [26.19%]
Joe Hazelton [ 1 ] ** [2.38%]
Carl Hewitt [ 0 ] ** [0.00%]
Oliver Kamm [ 0 ] ** [0.00%]
Andrew Keen [ 0 ] ** [0.00%]
Gregory Kohs [ 13 ] ** [30.95%]
Barry Kort [ 2 ] ** [4.76%]
Jaron Lanier [ 0 ] ** [0.00%]
Rachel Marsden [ 0 ] ** [0.00%]
Kelly Martin [ 1 ] ** [2.38%]
Cade Metz [ 1 ] ** [2.38%]
Larry Sanger [ 2 ] ** [4.76%]
Stacy Schiff [ 0 ] ** [0.00%]
John Seigenthaler [ 0 ] ** [0.00%]
Owen Thomas [ 0 ] ** [0.00%]
Other not listed (please cite your selection in a post) [ 4 ] ** [9.52%]
Total Votes: 84
Guests cannot vote 
thekohser
post
Post #1


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined:
Member No.: 911



Note that there are two questions in this poll. One about critics of Wikipedia, and the other about critics of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Note that "foremost" could be described as the "most famous person" who criticizes Wikipedia or the Wikimedia Foundation. Or, "foremost" could be described as the "most dedicated critic", regardless of fame. Or, it could easily be described as the "most effective or influential critic". How you choose is up to you.

The voting will remain open until the end of Sunday, April 3, 2001.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
powercorrupts
post
Post #2


.
*****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 716
Joined:
Member No.: 6,776



Isn't using the qualifier "best of this group" perhaps a little better than asking for the "World's foremost"? Surely that would be the only way most people can honestly vote, the world being a big place and not quite yet 100% internet/Wikipedia friendly, alas. Some links and tips would be useful at least, followed by the 'vote' at the end of the digestion period. We all know Gregory Kohs of course, but to vote for the bestest 'in the world' you have to have knowledge of the whole field surely.

Unfortunately I think many new people to WR could think this poll is tongue in cheek. (though regulars will know it is serious of course).

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thekohser
post
Post #3


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined:
Member No.: 911



QUOTE(powercorrupts @ Thu 24th March 2011, 4:20pm) *

Isn't using the qualifier "best of this group" perhaps a little better than asking for the "World's foremost"? Surely that would be the only way most people can honestly vote, the world being a big place and not quite yet 100% internet/Wikipedia friendly, alas. Some links and tips would be useful at least, followed by the 'vote' at the end of the digestion period. We all know Gregory Kohs of course, but to vote for the bestest 'in the world' you have to have knowledge of the whole field surely.

Unfortunately I think many new people to WR could think this poll is tongue in cheek. (though regulars will know it is serious of course).

I disagree with just about every trifling comment you just made. Why do you need "links and tips"? The whole Internet is out there, waiting to answer any of the questions you might have about any of these leading critics. If you feel that a particularly strong candidate was left out of the mix, open your mouth. Man, you are annoying, Mike.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
thekohser   World's foremost WP & WMF critics  
It's the blimp, Frank   We're off to a bad start insofar as people are...  
thekohser   We're off to a bad start insofar as people ar...  
Tarc   Hazelton? Lulz. That's like looking at a lis...  
Cock-up-over-conspiracy   Isn't there a category for the cockiest critic...  
thekohser   Only 14 people have voted? This site must be dyin...  
LessHorrid vanU   Only 14 people have voted? This site must be dyi...  
DollyD   The voting will remain open until the end of Sun...  
Detective   It's over 30 people now. Maybe the others mi...  
thekohser   he trouble with this poll is that few people here...  
Detective   Do tell, Detective! Or, are you just specula...  
Cock-up-over-conspiracy   Nor is there any way to vote in one half and absta...  
DollyD   It's over 30 people now. Maybe the others m...  
Gruntled   We should of course have had a preliminary discuss...  
CharlotteWebb   We should of course have had a preliminary discus...  
thekohser   We should of course have had a preliminary discus...  
Gruntled   [quote name='Gruntled' post='271656' date='Sat 26...  
Zoloft   [quote name='Gruntled' post='271656' date='Sat 2...  
Alison   I have no doubt that you, "Charlotte", ...  
Gruntled   [quote name='Gruntled' post='271671' date='Sun 27...  
Doc glasgow   I notice Danny Wool was for some reason omitted fr...  
thekohser   I notice Danny Wool was for some reason omitted f...  
Doc glasgow   I notice Danny Wool was for some reason omitted ...  
thekohser   However, it may make the poll result a bit questi...  
lilburne   Outright attacks rarely land a killer blow on the ...  
EricBarbour   My worthless 2 cents: Colbert isn't a valid ...  
Milton Roe   I would personally give the top ratings to Greg a...  
Herschelkrustofsky   Kohs deserves honorable mention and the silver me...  
thekohser   If we consider this a "primary" vote, sh...  
Herschelkrustofsky   I'm not sure i understand the point of it all....  
thekohser   I'm not sure i understand the point of it all...  
Daniel Brandt   I'm not sure i understand the point of it all...  
powercorrupts   I'm not sure i understand the point of it all...  


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now:
 
     
FORUM WARNING [2] Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/wikipede/public_html/int042kj398.php:242) (Line: 0 of Unknown)