FORUM WARNING [2] Division by zero (Line: 2933 of /srcsgcaop/boardclass.php)
Arbcom goes after Betacommand -
     
 
The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> Arbcom goes after Betacommand, Another victory for the Free Kulture crowd
-DS-
post
Post #1


Ethernaut
***

Group: Contributors
Posts: 164
Joined:
Member No.: 39,458



The Arbitrary Committee is now going after Betacommand/Δ for doing NFCC enforcement, and it looks like he'll be sanctioned this time.

I think there's a lesson to be learned here folks: just because people complain about something, it doesn't automatically become bad.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
Gandoman
post
Post #2


New Member
*

Group: Contributors
Posts: 32
Joined:
Member No.: 6,477



Everyone who knows Betacommand's past history will see that this case fundamentally does not have anything to do with enforcement of non-free images. The reason Betacommand is once again in trouble is, frankly speaking, that he behaves like a prick. He has carried out the exact same behaviour in relation to lots of other areas, such as username policy enforcement, external link cleanup, article categorisation etc. Look at his very first arbcom case, where he was desysopped, for examples.

The problem is always the same, that he makes extensive, rapid edits to enforce his view of a certain policy. And he may actually be in line with policy, but he does it with a rigid, no-common-sense approach that invariably draws complaints. He then gets on his high horse, says he is right according to the letter of the policy, and gets into edit-wars and insults those who have legitimate questions because they do not understand Betacommand's rigid view of policies.

It does not help when people like Hammersoft point out that Betacommand is acting "well within image policy", and fail to understand that the basic problem has nothing to do with images, it is his lack of people skills. This gives Betacommand a signal hat he is "doing the right thing", and he then continues his bad behaviour with even more confIdence.

My prediction now that Betacommand is banned from image policy enforcement: the image policy will continue to be enforced, even better than now because it will be done by people with common sense and who will be able to respond to queries by confused users in an adequate way. Betacommand will find some other aspect of policy that he will mechanically enforce with the same lack of common sense, and the same belligerent attitude when someone dares question his actions. I expect another huge ANI thread about Betacommand in a few weeks' time, and it will eventually go all the way to another Arbcom action. The problem will continue until it is recognised that Betacommand is fundamentally incapable of working in a collaborative environment like Wikipedia, and he is banned for good.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
-DS-   Arbcom goes after Betacommand  
SpiderAndWeb   The Arbitrary Committee is now going after Betaco...  
lilburne   It'll be interesting to see if Arbcom sticks ...  
-DS-   [quote name='-DS-' post='279768' date='...  
SpiderAndWeb   [quote name='-DS-' post='279768' date=...  
-DS-   [quote name='-DS-' post='279790' date='...  
SpiderAndWeb   He *can't* be trusted to make N edits a minute...  
trenton   I agree it's hard to say why the line is at 4...  
trenton   Stupid forum software... looks like its regurgitat...  
The Joy   What does Betacommand want? What does he want to ...  
-DS-   Honestly, besides pissing off image-uploaders and ...  
LessHorrid vanU   Honestly, besides pissing off image-uploaders and...  
RMHED   You have to admire his ability to ignore/forget/m...  
LessHorrid vanU   You have to admire his ability to ignore/forget/...  
lilburne   Sometimes, it is amazing that articles get writt...  
Abd   Sometimes, it is amazing that articles get written...  
Abd   Nearly everybody really believes that what they do...  
RMHED   Nearly everybody really believes that what they d...  
-DS-   The motion has passed. Cue the celebrations by th...  
MZMcBride   Everyone who knows Betacommand's past history ...  
-DS-   http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...799#U...  
Gandoman   http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...799#...  
Maetu   It also seems like a great number of Arbs are miss...  


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now:
 
     
FORUM WARNING [2] Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/wikipede/public_html/int042kj398.php:242) (Line: 0 of Unknown)