QUOTE(Michaeldsuarez @ Mon 1st August 2011, 8:10am)
Speaking from my personal experience and insights, the only rumor included in the Wikipedia article is the claim that Brandt runs josephevers.blogpot.com, and the article notes that Brandt dismisses that claim. I can verify everything else in the Wikipedia article. The uncertainty of the blog's ownership doesn't diminish the significance of Brandt's involvement, as he himself admits. I didn't include the rumors about an "army of pissed people" and "false DMCAs" that the Daily Dot article speaks of. Are there any specific "rumors" in the Wikipedia article that you're concerned about?
You could add that the entire motivation for ED.ch is to increase traffic by drawing attention to themselves, and the way they do this is to defame and abuse others in the name of "lulz." Currently they are dismissing nearly all complaints from their victims by claiming that their secret server is located offshore.
You can quote me on that.
[Aug 1 2011 03:59:37] <garrett> haters make us famous
...
[Aug 1 2011 04:12:47] <garrett> our alexa rankings
[Aug 1 2011 04:12:48] <garrett> are like
[Aug 1 2011 04:12:49] <garrett> exploding
[Aug 1 2011 04:12:53] <garrett> thanks to all this media attention
[Aug 1 2011 04:12:54] <garrett> lolololololOr you could withdraw from editing the Wikipedia article on the grounds that Garrett made you an ED.ch administrator. This means that you are editing this Wikipedia article with a conflict of interest, which is supposedly discouraged on Wikipedia.
14:43, 19 May 2011 Garrett (Talk | contribs) changed group membership for User:JuniusThaddeus from (none) to Administrators