The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> General Discussion? What's that all about?

This subforum is for general discussion of Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects. For a glossary of terms frequently used in such discussions, please refer to Wikipedia:Glossary. For a glossary of musical terms, see here. Other useful links:

Akahele.orgWikipedia-WatchWikitruthWP:ANWikiEN-L/Foundation-L (mailing lists) • Citizendium forums

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Admin IRC at a crossroads
anon1234
post Tue 16th January 2007, 7:02pm
Post #1


Senior Member
****

Group: Inactive
Posts: 401
Joined: Sat 8th Apr 2006, 2:40am
Member No.: 111



Intense discussion: Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#IRC_admin_channel

QUOTE
Numerous incidents involving gross incivility on the IRC channel have been brought to the Arbitration Committee's attention. We consider such behavior absolutely unacceptable; to ensure that it does not continue, we have worked with the leadership of the IRC channels to appoint additional channel ops, with a specific mandate to keep Wikimedia IRC channels polite and courteous. Behavior on the IRC channel may be taken into consideration with respect to arbitration cases if it results in disruption on Wikipedia. Fred Bauder for the Arbitration Committee 01:54, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

ArbCom is extending its jurisdiction to the admin IRC channel, albeit slowly. Most directly a result of Giano's IRC log postings during his Xmas/New Years meltdown.

An end to the admin IRC channel or a move towards the acceptance of full logging and disclosure?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jonny Cache
post Tue 16th January 2007, 7:46pm
Post #2


τα δε μοι παθήματα μαθήματα γέγονε
*********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 5,100
Joined: Sat 9th Sep 2006, 1:52am
Member No.: 398

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(anon1234 @ Tue 16th January 2007, 2:02pm) *

An end to the admin IRC channel or a move towards the acceptance of full logging and disclosure?


I think that the main effect can probably be summed up in a single edit line:

sub [airhead/a*hole]

As always, a purely verbal reform.

Jonny cool.gif

This post has been edited by Jonny Cache: Tue 16th January 2007, 7:48pm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
the fieryangel
post Tue 16th January 2007, 10:00pm
Post #3


the Internet Review Corporation is watching you...
********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,990
Joined: Tue 21st Nov 2006, 9:49pm
From: It's all in your mind anyway...
Member No.: 577



QUOTE(Jonny Cache @ Tue 16th January 2007, 8:46pm) *

I think that the main effect can probably be summed up in a single edit line:

sub [airhead/a*hole]

As always, a purely verbal reform.

Jonny cool.gif


JC gets another hole in one....figuratively speaking, of course!


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Somey
post Wed 17th January 2007, 3:50am
Post #4


Can't actually moderate
*********

Group: Moderators
Posts: 11,814
Joined: Sat 17th Jun 2006, 7:47pm
From: Dreamland
Member No.: 275



I agree - I doubt anything will really change, long term, in the way admins use "back-channel" communications. They might at least pretend to be hard-asses about things like obscenities, ad-hominem bashing, and vulgar topics for the next few weeks though, I suppose... But really, how much fun is that? If people can't go into chatrooms with their wikifriends and type out line after line about furry porn for literally hours on end, what's the point of being involved with Wikipedia in the first place?

Of course, it's hard to control what goes on in IRC anyway - or more to the point, they can't just wipe the history like they can with good ol' MediaWiki. Once something gets said, that's it, it's out there, and the best they can do is claim that the logs were "fabricated," or that the offending conversation was "months ago, so it's no longer relevant."

Besides, all the really forward-thinking "cabal" members have been using IM for months now! dry.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Elara
post Wed 17th January 2007, 4:14am
Post #5


Ghoul Inquisitor General
***

Group: Contributors
Posts: 155
Joined: Wed 3rd Jan 2007, 2:16am
From: Perhaps the Honeycomb Hideout? No.
Member No.: 787

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



Not just IM, either. How long does it take to register an IRC channel on some IRC network? Spread the #channelname via email to your trusted buddies. Fresh new backchannel.

ArbCom continues to waste it's time...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
a view from the hive
post Sat 20th January 2007, 4:12am
Post #6


Junior Member
**

Group: Contributors
Posts: 90
Joined: Sat 30th Dec 2006, 12:42am
From: Milky Way Galaxy
Member No.: 768

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Somey @ Tue 16th January 2007, 7:50pm) *

I agree - I doubt anything will really change, long term, in the way admins use "back-channel" communications. They might at least pretend to be hard-asses about things like obscenities, ad-hominem bashing, and vulgar topics for the next few weeks though, I suppose... But really, how much fun is that? If people can't go into chatrooms with their wikifriends and type out line after line about furry porn for literally hours on end, what's the point of being involved with Wikipedia in the first place?

Of course, it's hard to control what goes on in IRC anyway - or more to the point, they can't just wipe the history like they can with good ol' MediaWiki. Once something gets said, that's it, it's out there, and the best they can do is claim that the logs were "fabricated," or that the offending conversation was "months ago, so it's no longer relevant."

Besides, all the really forward-thinking "cabal" members have been using IM for months now! dry.gif


Wait a second, you know of useful conversation going on in that conversation. I see

"lol"
"hahahaha"
links to digg
links to slashdot
smile.gif
ohmy.gif

No seriously, nothing happens on IRC. The IRC is like myspace, but even more boring....

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Somey
post Sat 20th January 2007, 4:37am
Post #7


Can't actually moderate
*********

Group: Moderators
Posts: 11,814
Joined: Sat 17th Jun 2006, 7:47pm
From: Dreamland
Member No.: 275



QUOTE(a view from the hive @ Fri 19th January 2007, 10:12pm) *
No seriously, nothing happens on IRC. The IRC is like myspace, but even more boring....

So why make such a fuss about logging?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
LamontStormstar
post Sat 20th January 2007, 4:45am
Post #8


Postmaster
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,359
Joined: Fri 18th Aug 2006, 7:25am
Member No.: 342

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



They should stop using IRC and use some much better chat system. One that firstly, protects peoples IP addresses. Secondly, is run by Wikipedia Admins and not some IRC bullies who don't edit on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia donates to Freenode so they could put that money into their own chat system.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th 5 13, 8:46am