On the Nature and Sources of Expertise, Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief Wiki Systems Options

[Jonny Cache]

On the Nature and Sources of Expertise

Questions about the nature of expertise have been coming up in several of the forums where I spend my time of late, and I've begun to notice curious discrepancies among the things that different people say about it, not to mention the many divergences between those assumptions and the way that I've always thought about expertise, well, at least, for as long as I can remember. So I think I'll break the ice with that.

Just trying to resuscitate this topic that keeps coming up in parallel dialogues on both the old wiki and the new wiki, but that just as quickly keeps falling into some kind of narcoleptic coma. This time I'll try a tactic of selective cross-posting between the two wikiverses of Citizendium and Wikipedia Review.

Nota Bene. This essay is being transposted to the following two wikiverses:

• Citizendium Forums
• Wikipedia Review

Jonny (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/cool.gif)

This post has been edited by Jonny Cache:

[poopooball]

some1 above put the prob w/sangers proj perfectly. im likely one of only a half dozen ppl who could be considered expert on a very few subjects who is online and demonstrates it. unless some ppl rise from the dead or teach 90 yr olds how to wiki, that might not chng. will sanger accept that even if my degree is in something diff?