 Assessing Wikipedia, Wiki-Style, on Its 10th Anniversary - BusinessWeek |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
  |
| Newsfeed |
 Sat 8th January 2011, 2:26am
Post
#1
|
|
Postmaster General  Group: Bots Posts: 3,272 Joined: Mon 3rd Sep 2007, 9:29pm Member No.: 2,885  |
<img alt="" height="1" width="1" />Assessing [b]Wikipedia, Wiki-Style, on Its 10th Anniversary[/b] BusinessWeek This article was produced under a loose interpretation of Wikipedia's collaborative principles. Where indicated, it was rewritten, ... View the article |
   |
 
|
| thekohser |
Sat 8th January 2011, 4:03am
Post
#2
|
|
Member Group: Regulars Posts: 10,274 Joined: Thu 1st Feb 2007, 10:21pm Member No.: 911 |
QUOTE This article covered soup to nuts, except it forgot the nuts. The former COO of the Wikimedia Foundation who was a wanted felon in two states. The Deputy Director whose tolerant views on child pornography drew heavy criticism from the press. And, let's not forget the "edits before sex" scandal that Jimmy Wales couldn't keep under wraps with a Canadian political pundit. Is it any wonder the Wikimedia Foundation is awash in wasteful spending (earning only one star out of four in an organizational efficiency rating by Charity Navigator), siphoning 59 cents of every donated dollar toward bank accounts, fundraising slush, and consultants awarded secret contracts? |
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 20th 6 13, 8:50am |