Let's have some fun, Funny posts, funny messages, funny edit summaries Options

[mbz1]

There is always something to have a good, kind laugh over. I mean some funny posts at Wikipedia.
Let's use this thread to link to these here. Let's leave our anger to a different threads. Please let this thread to be kind and funny. OK, I'll start:

1. A blocked editor cannot understand what he was blocked for yet another time, claiming he did only as he always does. An admin responses (see edit summary)"sorry, TT, but if you always do what you always did, you always get what you always got": (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/evilgrin.gif)

2.Arbitration enforcement concerning user Dinner for three starts like this:"Dinner for three (talk · contribs) is a single-purpose account created with the sole aim of hounding an ideological opponent, Lunch for Two (talk · contribs) (whose name he evidently apes) " (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/tongue.gif)

3.A post on AN/I:"What does being naked have to do with pregnancy?" (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/confused.gif)

This post has been edited by mbz1:

[mbz1]

I believe if we compare with [[:Category:Trafalgar Square|Trafalgar Square]], we can find more images of the unique Nelson's Column compared to all images of the human penis for which we may estimate that around 5 billion times many more exist on the planet. --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 12:16, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

I believe the next time WMF should be asking for donating images of penises. After all there are "around 5 billion times many more" penises on the planet than "the unique Nelson's Column". (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/biggrin.gif)

This post has been edited by mbz1:

[thekohser]

I believe if we compare with [[:Category:Trafalgar Square|Trafalgar Square]], we can find more images of the unique Nelson's Column compared to all images of the human penis for which we may estimate that around 5 billion times many more exist on the planet. --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 12:16, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

I believe the next time WMF should be asking for donating images of penises. After all there are "around 5 billion times many more" penises on the planet than "the unique Nelson's Column". (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/biggrin.gif)

I think there are only about 3.5 billion living human penises on Earth. Is he including all humans, dead or alive? Let's dig up Lincoln for the next "Wikipedia Loves Penises" meet-up!

[mbz1]

I believe if we compare with [[:Category:Trafalgar Square|Trafalgar Square]], we can find more images of the unique Nelson's Column compared to all images of the human penis for which we may estimate that around 5 billion times many more exist on the planet. --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 12:16, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

I believe the next time WMF should be asking for donating images of penises. After all there are "around 5 billion times many more" penises on the planet than "the unique Nelson's Column". (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/biggrin.gif)

I think there are only about 3.5 billion living human penises on Earth. Is he including all humans, dead or alive? Let's dig up Lincoln for the next "Wikipedia Loves Penises" meet-up!

Here's my exchange with Commons admin(I believe it is funny, but my Russian sense of humor could be different than the sense of humor of the most people here) Anyway here it is:

Question: Fæ, you write: "we can find more images of the unique Nelson's Column compared to all images of the human penis for which we may estimate that around 5 billion times many more exist on the planet." Does it mean that you're suggesting that Commons should host as many images of penises, and naked butts including the ones decorated with chains for that matter, as it gets? After all there are "around 5 billion times many more exist on the planet" than a boring and a very unique Nelson's Column. BTW did you mention this idea in your presentation to the Parliament? This sure would have helped Wikipedia UK to get a status of a charitable organization :-)--Mbz1 (talk) 19:38, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

That really is quite irrelevant, please keep your mind on the task at hand. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:05, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

What "really is quite irrelevant" how many unique penises are there in the world or how many even more unique butts are there :-) BTW, muttbuck, while we are talking about penises I'd like to ask you please as an experienced admin:A policy states:Commons:What Commons is not#Commons is not an amateur porn site. Does it mean there is no problem with porn images as long as they are professional? --Mbz1 (talk) 02:51, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

I meant the Parliament bit. -mattbuck (Talk) 03:06, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Ah, I see the number of unique penises and unique butts are relative, only "the Parliament bit" is not :-) Thanks.--Mbz1 (talk) 03:20, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

[Eppur si muove]

[
Here's my exchange with Commons admin(I believe it is funny, but my Russian sense of humor could be different than the sense of humor of the most people here) Anyway here it is:

Question: Fæ, you write: "we can find more images of the unique Nelson's Column compared to all images of the human penis for which we may estimate that around 5 billion times many more exist on the planet." Does it mean that you're suggesting that Commons should host as many images of penises, and naked butts including the ones decorated with chains for that matter, as it gets? After all there are "around 5 billion times many more exist on the planet" than a boring and a very unique Nelson's Column. BTW did you mention this idea in your presentation to the Parliament? This sure would have helped Wikipedia UK to get a status of a charitable organization :-)--Mbz1 (talk) 19:38, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

That really is quite irrelevant, please keep your mind on the task at hand. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:05, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

What "really is quite irrelevant" how many unique penises are there in the world or how many even more unique butts are there :-) BTW, muttbuck, while we are talking about penises I'd like to ask you please as an experienced admin:A policy states:Commons:What Commons is not#Commons is not an amateur porn site. Does it mean there is no problem with porn images as long as they are professional? --Mbz1 (talk) 02:51, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

I meant the Parliament bit. -mattbuck (Talk) 03:06, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Ah, I see the number of unique penises and unique butts are relative, only "the Parliament bit" is not :-) Thanks.--Mbz1 (talk) 03:20, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

It's amusing here. I thought you were starting a gradual reverse spoonerism there and were eventually going to call him muckbutt.

One of the people more expert with more expertise at transplanting things from YouTube might be able to find the Not the Nine O'clock News sketch where famous London landmarks including Nelson's Column and the clock tower of the Houses of Parliament are compared to phalluses.

This post has been edited by Eppur si muove:

[mbz1]

[
Here's my exchange with Commons admin(I believe it is funny, but my Russian sense of humor could be different than the sense of humor of the most people here) Anyway here it is:

Question: Fæ, you write: "we can find more images of the unique Nelson's Column compared to all images of the human penis for which we may estimate that around 5 billion times many more exist on the planet." Does it mean that you're suggesting that Commons should host as many images of penises, and naked butts including the ones decorated with chains for that matter, as it gets? After all there are "around 5 billion times many more exist on the planet" than a boring and a very unique Nelson's Column. BTW did you mention this idea in your presentation to the Parliament? This sure would have helped Wikipedia UK to get a status of a charitable organization :-)--Mbz1 (talk) 19:38, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

That really is quite irrelevant, please keep your mind on the task at hand. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:05, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

What "really is quite irrelevant" how many unique penises are there in the world or how many even more unique butts are there :-) BTW, muttbuck, while we are talking about penises I'd like to ask you please as an experienced admin:A policy states:Commons:What Commons is not#Commons is not an amateur porn site. Does it mean there is no problem with porn images as long as they are professional? --Mbz1 (talk) 02:51, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

I meant the Parliament bit. -mattbuck (Talk) 03:06, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Ah, I see the number of unique penises and unique butts are relative, only "the Parliament bit" is not :-) Thanks.--Mbz1 (talk) 03:20, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

It's amusing here. I thought you were starting a gradual reverse spoonerism there and were eventually going to call him muckbutt.

One of the people more expert with more expertise at transplanting things from YouTube might be able to find the Not the Nine O'clock News sketch where famous London landmarks including Nelson's Column and the clock tower of the Houses of Parliament are compared to phalluses.

I was thinking about calling him "mattbutt", but for anything smarter than that my knowledge of English and English/American cultures are not good enough. (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/ermm.gif)