FORUM WARNING [2] Division by zero (Line: 2933 of /srcsgcaop/boardclass.php)
What exactly is it that Arbs do? -
     
 
The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> What exactly is it that Arbs do?, And why the hell does it take forty two months for anyone of them to l
radek
post
Post #1


Ãœber Member
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 699
Joined:
Member No.: 15,651



Can anyone explain this mystery to me?

I understand that there maybe a lot of *sekirt sht* that arbs have to deal with before they actually issue their words of wisdom on a particular case/amendment/appeal. Uhh... what is it? Or at least let's have an affirmation that there is a lot of sekrit sht that delays a timely response on these cases.

Seriously, the length of time before something is actually brought up and before it is... even commented upon is something like a month... and that's just the first comment. Then it takes another two weeks or so before another comment is made. And so it goes on and on and on... Why? Are they sifting through some super secret files? I know there's some present and former Arbs around here so could they please explain it to us lesser folks?

Some interesting associated phenomenon:

1. From what I understand the on-Wiki activity of people newly elected to ArbCom all of sudden drops. So maybe they are dealing with the sekrit sht.
2. Or maybe they just rest on their laurels.
3. Except that most of them usually campaign on the platform (in some way or another) of making ArbCom more timely and "transparent"? Can anyone point to an instance where the ArbCom - or at least an individual members choices - somehow became noticeably more transparent?
4. The fact that even the candidates that you have some hope for that are initially "rebels" - *cough* Iridescent *cough* - end up doing the exact same thing... taking for ever... so maybe it is a structural problem. or maybe they just rest on their laurels.

Regardless, they may be a good reason for why the ArbCom appears so slow and inefficient. But at the very least, let us know! My sense of it is that by definition ArbCom has to deal with pain-in-the-ass, hard to define, uncomfortable cases and these are exactly the kinds of situations which any normal person procrastinates as much as possible (like doing your taxes on April 15th). Add that up across all the multiple members and you get institutional laziness. But part of what we pay them for is to resolve these things in a timely fashion. I want my money back. Way I figure it by this time, ArbCom as a collective entity owns me a few hundred dollars worth of compensation for stress and psychological damage incurred due to my breathless and frustrated waiting for its decision.

At the very least - how about one of the former ArbCom members that frequent this forum gives us a "day in the life" rundown. The plebs want to know.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
radek   What exactly is it that Arbs do?  
melloden   loooooooooool. Maybe I'm an arb ....... or no...  
radek   loooooooooool. Maybe I'm an arb ....... or n...  
thekohser   I didn't want to have to do this, but I can...  
Kelly Martin   You seem to be laboring under the misapprehension ...  
Eva Destruction   4. The fact that even the candidates that you hav...  
Ottava   My Arbcom activities have been limited to replyin...  
Eva Destruction   [quote name='Eva Destruction' post='267190' date=...  
radek   4. The fact that even the candidates that you ha...  
Kelly Martin   CONTENT issues should be resolved by an open jury ...  
Eva Destruction   CONTENT issues should be resolved by an open jury...  
Kelly Martin   Agree with all that. I'd go further, and have ...  
gomi   With due respect, it is clear by now what the prim...  
Sarcasticidealist   At the very least - how about one of the former Ar...  
gomi   Though I don't buy into Kelly and Gomi's p...  
gomi   moved to the Politics forum. It seemed apropos.]  
radek   Thanks to Sarcasticidealist and Eva, as well as al...  
Milton Roe   'was wondering - a lot of this sounds like si...  
Eva Destruction   Thanks to Sarcasticidealist and Eva, as well as a...  
Peter Damian   Thanks to Sarcasticidealist and Eva, as well as ...  
EricBarbour   My personal plan (as I may have mentioned occasion...  
Eva Destruction   [quote name='Eva Destruction' post='267472' date=...  
Kelly Martin   I do believe there is a lot of decent material the...  
Eva Destruction   The process of winnowing Wikipedia's database...  
Peter Damian   My (long and tedious) ramblings on the matter are...  
Lar   Why don't you just resign and let Sandstein t...  
Peter Damian   Why don't you just resign and let Sandstein ...  
Zoloft   [quote name='Lar' post='267524' date='Sat 5th Febr...  
Milton Roe   [quote name='Lar' post='267524' date='Sat 5th Feb...  
EricBarbour   Sandstein fascinates me. Yeah, it's always fun...  
Cock-up-over-conspiracy   [quote name='Peter Damian' post='267525' date='Sa...  
Apathetic   Thanks to Sarcasticidealist and Eva, as well as a...  
Peter Damian   I had an email from a member of Arbcom about that...  
Ottava   John Vandenberg has some interesting observations...  


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now:
 
     
FORUM WARNING [2] Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/wikipede/public_html/int042kj398.php:242) (Line: 0 of Unknown)