QUOTE(Somey @ Mon 19th November 2007, 11:05am)
If he was part of that whole [redacted]/[redacted]/[redacted] "Morality + Quality + Typical Wikipedians = Chaos" crowd, then it's no wonder they wanted to get rid of him...
Do you really think that it was so well thought out? Maybe so, but I don't see the cabal as a cohesive unit at present, but as more of a
fractious entity. Even in a minor gossip level, it seems not really organized. Otherwise, there would have been a gang of six, bullying down any nay-sayers, and even if obviously wrong, she would not have backed down, would not have erased and deleted, and would not have given what she thinks passes for an apology. Instead, we saw
6-12 nay-sayers were challenging her conclusions[b].
(ok, one of them is running against her for Arbcom, but nonetheless, there's more than one seat open)This seems like a group by the gang of one (plus one always-overly-enthusiastic JeH, riding shotgun).
Of course, maybe she didn't like his gang anyways. But she didn't seem aware he was so active of a contributor, i.e. surprised to be told that (by his many much-annoyed defenders).
I think she is so busy chasing
evil imaginary sockpuppet ghosts that she isn't much into the "mix" of late.
This post has been edited by Somey: