| |
 User:Ceiling Cat, The exquisite sense of humor of Raul654 |
|
|
| LaraLove |
 Wed 6th August 2008, 11:31pm
|
Wikipedia BLP advocate
Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,741
Joined: Mon 28th Jan 2008, 7:53pm
Member No.: 4,627
WP user page -
talk
check -
contribs
|
QUOTE(everyking @ Wed 6th August 2008, 1:50am)  Recently someone brought the issue of Raul654's sockpuppet account, User:Ceiling Cat, to the attention of WP:AN. The edits speak for themselves--they are nothing but foolishness of the sort associated with internet trolls, and some of it is disruptive foolishness. Many people on AN are of the opinion that an account like this, which does nothing but engage in low-level mischief, is all right as long as the user behind it contributes to the encyclopedia on another account--but if it were just some newbie, it would be banned, of course. Wow. And people bitch about the Bathrobe Cabal. |
|
|
|
|
|
| everyking |
Thu 14th August 2008, 7:49am
|
Postmaster
Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,368
Joined: Mon 27th Mar 2006, 7:24am
Member No.: 81
|
Raul654 says that he doesn't care about what is said on "Trollreview". However, it was just a week ago that he made it clear that he cares deeply about what I say here. He said then that I was using WR to "rewrite history" and expressed concern that new users would be guiled into believing my version of events, offering instead a "history of you" filled with staggering inaccuracies and peppered with insults. It troubles Raul immensely that, through WR, people might learn that I was placed under a pile of unnecessary restrictions for purely political reasons (repeatedly opposing abuse of other contributors by powerful admins, several months before the actual case), and later banned for two weeks and placed under further restrictions based on blatantly false accusations made by Raul himself, in his multiple roles as accuser, prosecutor, and jury member. Is Raul only concerned with what I say on this forum? It seems more plausible that he reads the forum regularly and takes it quite seriously. This post has been edited by everyking: Thu 14th August 2008, 7:50am |
|
|
|
|
|
| Somey |
Fri 6th February 2009, 6:33am
|
Can't actually moderate
Group: Moderators
Posts: 11,814
Joined: Sat 17th Jun 2006, 7:47pm
From: Dreamland
Member No.: 275
|
QUOTE(everyking @ Thu 5th February 2009, 10:37pm) Who else would be allowed to do this? If I were to create a joke account and go around trolling prominent talk pages, would no one stop me? First of all, I'm not sure I would call this "trolling." There really is a lot of blatantly anti-cat bias in the Featured Images category. For example, take this panoramic image of Bratislava - do you see even a single cat in that photograph? I mean, sure, there probably are one or two somewhere in the city, but they're all obscured by buildings and trees and so forth. As for the second question, I would think more people would commend you than try to stop you, but that's just me applying my own personal value system to the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
| EricBarbour |
Sat 7th February 2009, 9:38am
|
blah
Group: Regulars
Posts: 5,919
Joined: Mon 25th Feb 2008, 2:31am
Member No.: 5,066
WP user page -
talk
check -
contribs
|
I do so hope the little shit is reading this. In which case: Mr. Pellegrini, you are a tedious, lying, backstabbing asshole.
And most other people on WR will probably agree with me.
Just wanted to point that out. Thanks.  (and btw: there's not much traffic on this subforum, because you really aren't very interesting. And besides, judging from recent talk about Arbcom activities, you appear to have lost a lot of your "power" in recent months. ) |
|
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| |
