In praise of Wikimedia Strategy, Chris Grams, hypocrite Options

[thekohser]

This is a particularly predictable publication.

Chris Grams is a partner at New Kind, a strategic communications, design, and innovation firm. Previously, Chris spent 10 years at Red Hat, where he played a "key role" in building the Red Hat brand and "culture". (See where this is headed?) Mr. Grams also blogs about brand, "community", and culture at Dark Matter Matters.

If you need to reach Chris Grams, he asks that you contact him via Twitter. (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/wacko.gif)

Also, if you post a comment that is the least bit critical of the Wikimedia Strategy process, Chris Grams will delete it for you.

Even though his blog post praises the "strategic planning process in all of its transparent, open glory".

(IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/hmmm.gif)

Do you think there's some sort of school or clinic where these free culture Kool-Aid drinkers go to get the skepticism scooped right out of their heads, only to be replaced with a healthy clump of hypocrisy?

[thekohser]

Jeff Mackanic says this about my deleted comment:

Here is some text from the post that was deleted:

Maybe like a glory hole. You see, the head guy of that Strategy circle-jerk
simply removes anything and anyone that doesn't already "fit" in the
predetermined hole that the Wikimedia Foundation's digging itself.

The reason I deleted the post is the terms 'circle-jerk' and 'glory hole'.
The content is fine. It was just that the words 'circle-jerk' and 'glory hole' might be perceived as lewd or profane.

Your other comments are great and add to the value of the site - thank you