Hello everyone,
With regard to JzG:
I advocate for my daughter, first diagnosed with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, later Lyme disease, who is severely disabled by her illness. I also undertake academic criticism, of the claims made by some psychiatrists about these illnesses being ’psychosomatic’ and advocate for the ME/CFS community itself. Therefore, I do have a real world reputation that might be brought into disrepute by libellous, defamatory comments.
JZG made a number of defamatory (and libellous) claims about me (and implied others) on the admin notice board in September 2007 and elsewhere in time and place on Wikipedia, the circumstances of which are outlined here:
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/APK-PAPERS/message/19Large sections of the Simon Wessely talk page had already been removed by Jim Wales himself in 2006, after I and my erstwhile colleague formally wrote to him demanding he remove comments, made by JzG and another admin, JFW, which were highly inflammatory towards us. He removed some of them (though I kept copies of what was said), but the two admins continued making similar comments over the course of about a year and a half on the talk page.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=165865721As is probably evident from these links, my problems with the conduct of JzG, and indeed Jimbo Wales, are these:
1. JzG's misrepresentation of me and my work in the open discussions to other admins, in particular defamatory and libellous claims he has made about me:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...of_userspace.3Fhttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...scalate_this.3Fhttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...0#Simon_WesselyOf particular worry are the claims that I ‘have a visceral hatred for Simon Wessely’, the misrepresentation of the work I am doing in the real world, the claim that “You need to draw a distinction between what Angela Kennedy says, and what might be regarded as truth by anybody with both feet on the groundâ€, and, most libellous of all, his claim that ‘these individuals’ [meaning me and unnamed others] have harassed Wessely in real life: all of which have potentially highly damaging effects on my real world reputation.
2. JzG's (uninformed) conclusions on his website, and on the talk pages, that CFS is psychosomatic, Wessely’s work is correct, and that objections to Wessely’s claims are extreme, ideological etc. therefore making him a biased party in a dispute which he escalated (see the end paragraph of this link for his position):
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk/wiki/Wesselygate3. The placement of a "banned user" tag on my user page, which contravenes decency and privacy . The arbitrary wikipedia ‘justice’ is being used to tar people at the top of a google search. I was permanently banned by Wales himself.
4. Possible off-wiki engagement between JzG and the subject of the page, Simon Wessely, in such a way as to suggest a possible collusion, particularly around false claims that I have ‘personally harassed’ Simon Wessely (as per his comments here):
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...0#Simon_Wessely(But also see here):
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk/w/index.ph...changes&days=14 I have written to Simon Wessely’s line managers about this issue. So far they have been most uncooperative. The correspondence can be seen here:
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/APK-PAPERS/message/17But the whole issue needs further investigation.
5. Off-wiki engagement with Jim Wales with prejudicial effects on me:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...scalate_this.3Fhttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...of_userspace.3FI appreciate this is a complex issue. I am willing to provide further evidence and answer questions on this issue where possible and appropriate.
Angela