Slim decides some WP:OR is okay, you have to have uploaded your pubes to qualify Options

It appears that SlimVirgin, while still opposed to any form of Original Research being used as a Reliable Source (when she doesn't like it), will be offering an "exception" of sorts to Mr. David Shankbone. You know, since he was so kind to upload pictures of his pubic hair to Wikipedia. The man is to be trusted as an originally secondary tertiary source, my friends!

UPDATE: And Jimbo is in agreement. Trust all sources that have the David "check out my pubes" Shankbone byline. They are reliable.

Greg

This post has been edited by thekohser: Tue 25th December 2007, 4:48am

It all depends on which side of the cabal you're on. If you have sysop buttons, or are part of one of their cliques, you can edit in whatever insanity you wish.

See also, Chip Berlet.

It all depends on which side of the cabal you're on. If you have sysop buttons, or are part of one of their cliques, you can edit in whatever insanity you wish.

See also, Chip Berlet.

Ok, thats just creepy. If he was dying to donate his pubes, why not make a SPA?

Does being feted by the Israeli ministry of foreign affairs make everything this dude does ok now?

If he was dying to donate his pubes, why not make a SPA?

Then nobody would know they were his, would they? Has anyone told the Israeli Ministry of Religious Affairs?

It appears that SlimVirgin, while still opposed to any form of Original Research being used as a Reliable Source (when she doesn't like it), will be offering an "exception" of sorts to Mr. David Shankbone. You know, since he was so kind to upload pictures of his pubic hair to Wikipedia. The man is to be trusted as an originally secondary tertiary source, my friends!

UPDATE: And Jimbo is in agreement. Trust all sources that have the David "check out my pubes" Shankbone byline. They are reliable.

Greg

Joseph's favorite "critter" has corrected me by private message. The "body parts" photo series are of a male model, not Shankbone himself. Whew.

Greg

It's interesting because SlimV often takes what seem to be hypocritical positions, this is just another example. Review the debate on Jimbo's talk regarding original research accusations towards User:Jon Awbrey. There are a ton of examples where she adjusts things that are "principles" to fit whatever she is arguing at the moment, which makes one wonder if she indeed has any principles.

Joseph's favorite "critter" has corrected me by private message. The "body parts" photo series are of a male model, not Shankbone himself. Whew.

Greg

Yeah, but anyways....

Imagine Britannica needing that in their volume. This is prurient stuff.

Slimmy recognizes inconceivably awesome brilliance when she sees it. After all, Shanky is apparently the reason free photos exist on Wikipedia, not to mention one of Wikipedia's leading editors. (I personally saw him leading something the other day that looked almost like a chihuahua, until I realized it was just another boyfriend.) And that's according to reliable sources with the mad sooper-sleuthing skillz and +10 independent fact-checking ability required to spell his name correctly.

Anyway, not to worry! Slimmy will soon be back to hassling minor admins and "established editors" for their usual unsanctioned thoughtcrimes, WP:OR or no WP:OR.

It appears that SlimVirgin, while still opposed to any form of Original Research being used as a Reliable Source (when she doesn't like it), will be offering an "exception" of sorts to Mr. David Shankbone. You know, since he was so kind to upload pictures of his pubic hair to Wikipedia. The man is to be trusted as an originally secondary tertiary source, my friends!

UPDATE: And Jimbo is in agreement. Trust all sources that have the David "check out my pubes" Shankbone byline. They are reliable.

Greg

People have uploaded pictures all sorts of naught bits, the anus, semen, gyno-something (male breasts), and worse. What makes this guy so special?

People have uploaded pictures all sorts of naught bits, the anus, semen, gyno-something (male breasts), and worse. What makes this guy so special?

He takes high-quality, professional photographs of many public figures and licenses them freely. His shots are much better than the average amateur's free shot of a public figure.

He takes high-quality, professional photographs of many public figures and licenses them freely. His shots are much better than the average amateur's free shot of a public figure.

Is that "public" or "pubic"?

Bwhahahaha good one Dan, I didn't even realize the pun until you pointed it out.

I've seen other people who have uploaded 2000x2000 closeups of their naughty bits, too.

Seriously, if Mr. David Shankbone is doing so obsessively then he really needs to be kept away from young children.

I've seen other people who have uploaded 2000x2000 closeups of their naughty bits, too.

Seriously, if Mr. David Shankbone is doing so obsessively then he really needs to be kept away from young children.

Absolute non-sequitur. An obsession with an aspect of sexuality does not default to being unsuitable to be in the company of children. A habit of expressing that obsession to such an audience may be a different thing, but there is no evidence that he has (or does) that.

There are far worse personality traits that might mar the minds of children. Prurience being one of them.