FORUM WARNING [2] Division by zero (Line: 2933 of /srcsgcaop/boardclass.php)
Export function disabled -
     
 
The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> General Discussion? What's that all about?

This subforum is for general discussion of Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects. For a glossary of terms frequently used in such discussions, please refer to Wikipedia:Glossary. For a glossary of musical terms, see here. Other useful links:

Akahele.orgWikipedia-WatchWikitruthWP:ANWikiEN-L/Foundation-L (mailing lists) • Citizendium forums

> Export function disabled, More technical failure
Emperor
post
Post #1


Postmaster
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,871
Joined:
Member No.: 2,042



From Jimmy's talk page

QUOTE(Wikipedia)
Why did Wikipedia change its export function so it no longer works with any other wikis?

Earlier this year Wikipedia changed Special:Export, so that everything exported is in a different format than the one it had previously used for years. This means that other wikis, such as wikia, can no longer import pages. Was that done on purpose? Dream Focus 22:17, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
You will probably get a quicker answer at WP:VPT where the techie types hang out.--ukexpat (talk) 02:30, 1 May 2012 (UTC) I'm afraid I don't know anything about it.--Jimbo Wales (talk) 09:46, 1 May 2012 (UTC)


This is subtle, but a huge nail in the coffin of the interwiki collaboration idea.

For a decade, the writers of Wikipedia assumed that if there was ever a reason to, they could easily take their content elsewhere.

Now database dumps don't work and Special:Export doesn't work.

The WMF has completely broken the trust of the original user base.

New license, new terms of use, and two key features of the wiki are disabled.


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
Michaeldsuarez
post
Post #2


Ãœber Member
*****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 562
Joined:
From: New York, New York
Member No.: 24,428



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Vil..._other_wikis.3F (permalink)

It's the result of Wikia's out-of-date software. Wikia users should petition their profit-making masters for more up-to-date software.

This post has been edited by Michaeldsuarez:
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Emperor
post
Post #3


Postmaster
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,871
Joined:
Member No.: 2,042



QUOTE(Michaeldsuarez @ Tue 1st May 2012, 5:16pm) *

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Vil..._other_wikis.3F (permalink)

It's the result of Wikia's out-of-date software. Wikia users should petition their profit-making masters for more up-to-date software.


With all the millions Wikipedia gets in donations every year, why can't they make it easier? What percentage goes towards improving these technologies? Why is the board not demanding better?

If Wikia can't even get imports to work, what chance do the rest of us have?

So MediaWiki goes from 1.000323 to 1.000324 and the whole system breaks? What kind of excuse is that? If doing the upgrade was going to make Wikipedia's export function break, they never should have gone ahead with it. Idiots! Idiots!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Tarc
post
Post #4


Fat Cat
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,124
Joined:
Member No.: 5,309



QUOTE(Emperor @ Tue 1st May 2012, 6:27pm) *

QUOTE(Michaeldsuarez @ Tue 1st May 2012, 5:16pm) *

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Vil..._other_wikis.3F (permalink)

It's the result of Wikia's out-of-date software. Wikia users should petition their profit-making masters for more up-to-date software.


With all the millions Wikipedia gets in donations every year, why can't they make it easier? What percentage goes towards improving these technologies? Why is the board not demanding better?

If Wikia can't even get imports to work, what chance do the rest of us have?

So MediaWiki goes from 1.000323 to 1.000324 and the whole system breaks? What kind of excuse is that? If doing the upgrade was going to make Wikipedia's export function break, they never should have gone ahead with it. Idiots! Idiots!


So why is that Wikipedia's problem and not Wikia's?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Emperor
post
Post #5


Postmaster
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,871
Joined:
Member No.: 2,042



QUOTE(Tarc @ Wed 2nd May 2012, 9:14am) *

So why is that Wikipedia's problem and not Wikia's?


Wikipedia's mission is to collect and share information. Technical problem are their problem, but yes you're right responsibility for anything is something they'd probably best never accept, nevermind the millions of dollars they have collected for the purpose of fixing problems like this.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Tarc
post
Post #6


Fat Cat
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,124
Joined:
Member No.: 5,309



QUOTE(Emperor @ Wed 2nd May 2012, 9:27am) *

QUOTE(Tarc @ Wed 2nd May 2012, 9:14am) *

So why is that Wikipedia's problem and not Wikia's?


Wikipedia's mission is to collect and share information. Technical problem are their problem, but yes you're right responsibility for anything is something they'd probably best never accept, nevermind the millions of dollars they have collected for the purpose of fixing problems like this.


I realize that you're probably swamped with work caused by the 3 people per month who visit the uncyclopedia, but that didn't answer the question. Try again?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Emperor
post
Post #7


Postmaster
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,871
Joined:
Member No.: 2,042



QUOTE(Tarc @ Thu 3rd May 2012, 11:54pm) *

QUOTE(Emperor @ Wed 2nd May 2012, 9:27am) *

QUOTE(Tarc @ Wed 2nd May 2012, 9:14am) *

So why is that Wikipedia's problem and not Wikia's?


Wikipedia's mission is to collect and share information. Technical problem are their problem, but yes you're right responsibility for anything is something they'd probably best never accept, nevermind the millions of dollars they have collected for the purpose of fixing problems like this.


I realize that you're probably swamped with work caused by the 3 people per month who visit the uncyclopedia, but that didn't answer the question. Try again?


I don't work on the uncyclopedia. You might be thinking of Somey? I think he helped out on it years ago, but I am not sure if he still does.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post



Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now:
 
     
FORUM WARNING [2] Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/wikipede/public_html/int042kj398.php:242) (Line: 0 of Unknown)