FORUM WARNING [2] Division by zero (Line: 2933 of /srcsgcaop/boardclass.php)
Penisthwaite -
     
 
The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> Help

This forum is for discussing specific Wikipedia editors, editing patterns, and general efforts by those editors to influence or direct content in ways that might not be in keeping with Wikipedia policy. Please source your claims and provide links where appropriate. For a glossary of terms frequently used when discussing Wikipedia and related projects, please refer to Wikipedia:Glossary.

> Penisthwaite
Versa
post
Post #1


Neophyte


Group: Contributors
Posts: 16
Joined:
Member No.: 6,679



Hello,

While looking for something else, I noticed that Ryan Postlethwaite is allowed to have an image of a "Human penis both flaccid and erect" on his user page but no one else allowed to.

See details at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Bad_image_list

QUOTE
File:Human penis both flaccid and erect.jpg except on Penis, User:Ryan Postlethwaite/Awards, User:Ryan Postlethwaite




Does anyone know how one would get permission for such a thing - not that I want one - does ArbCom or a steward have to O.K. it?

As far as I can tell it was WJBScribe who originally gave the explicit permission to Ryan.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=200365817
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
Somey
post
Post #2


Can't actually moderate (or even post)
*********

Group: Moderators
Posts: 11,816
Joined:
From: Dreamland
Member No.: 275



QUOTE(Versa @ Thu 22nd March 2012, 4:12pm) *
While looking for something else, I noticed that Ryan Postlethwaite is allowed to have an image of a "Human penis both flaccid and erect" on his user page but no one else allowed to.

This is exactly what I've said about Wikipedia all along: Once you start requiring users to post photos of their penises on their user-profile pages, where does it end? How do you avoid creating a slippery slope? First you'll have people like Ryan Postlethwaite insisting on posting two penis photos, then it'll be three penis photos, then four... until finally there are so many penis photos on everyone's use page that the fundamental vision and purpose that led them to require the penis photos in the first place has been lost, the entire conceptual rationale in ruins, scattered to the four winds. And what about the tiny number of female users on Wikipedia - where are they going to get their penis photos? Will they accept photos of fake penises or dildos, or fanciful drawings, paintings or sculptures of same, in those cases? And what if some enterprising female Wikipedian decides to "push the envelope" by painting a picture of a giant penis and then claiming it's representative of her actual penis? Even though she isn't supposed to have one in the first place? This sort of downward-spiraling phallic-image one-upmanship can only lead to one terrible, inevitable result: Penis Wars!

Frankly, if I were Jimbo, I'd deal with this problem decisively, by cutting it off at the root. (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/hrmph.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post



Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now:
 
     
FORUM WARNING [2] Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/wikipede/public_html/int042kj398.php:242) (Line: 0 of Unknown)