QUOTE(Jay @ Wed 21st November 2012, 8:01am)
Hmmm. Well, as someone who of course isn't a sockpuppet, I agree that Ottava lacks reading comprehension. I haven't bothered to check whether Samuel Johnson has been altered much from his version, but Detective clearly said "so many of his WP articles", not "all his WP articles".
A better example would be
To Autumn (T-H-L-K-D).
To Autumn led to an
FAR about the changes because it introduced many problems. It was not "fixed" with the community preferring my version. There is a great comment by Rlevse (ha!) that summarizes the concern of the community regarding the changes: " I've restored the pre-TFA version. A lot of the subsequent edits are really don't do much. For one thing, Amandajm inserted Sparknotes as refs and they're still there. That's utterly astounding. I'm not going to get into the merits of point of view A vs B, but a FA with sparknotes as refs is not a better version."
One is not "many" so your point is a failure. There are also none that "had" to be rewritten, so your point fails yet again. But you are a sock puppet, so you started off seeking failure.
This post has been edited by Ottava: