FORUM WARNING [2] Division by zero (Line: 2933 of /srcsgcaop/boardclass.php)
“Wikipedia Is Sexist” -
     
 
The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> Discussions in this subforum are hidden from search engines.

However, they are not hidden from automobile engines, including the newer, more "environmentally-friendly" electric and hybrid engines. Also, please note that this subforum is meant to be used for discussion of the actual biographical articles themselves; more generalized discussions of BLP policy should be posted in the General Discussion or Bureaucracy forums.

> â€œWikipedia Is Sexist”, Elisa • The French Exit
Jon Awbrey
post
Post #1


τὰ δέ μοι παθήματα μαθήματα γέγονε
*********

Group: Moderators
Posts: 6,783
Joined:
From: Meat Puppet Nation
Member No.: 5,619



QUOTE(Elisa Gabbert @ 22 Feb 2011)

Wikipedia has been on my mind lately, after hearing the statistic passed around a week or so ago that something like 87% of Wikipedia contributors/editors are male. This didn't surprise me in the least, and initially made no impression on me whatsoever. A few days later the obvious consequences of this dawned on me: Wikipedia is sexist. Of course this affects the content. Of course this bias trickles down and bleeds into the articles in subtle and not-so-subtle ways. I wouldn't want to read a magazine if only 1 out of 10 of its editors/contributors were women. Especially if the whole point of the magazine was to present objective, unbiased information in an encyclopedic fashion.

Maybe I'll boycott Wikipedia.

— Elisa Gabbert • 22 Feb 2011

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
chrisoff
post
Post #2


Member
***

Group: Contributors
Posts: 199
Joined:
Member No.: 17,248



From the same article:

QUOTE
The Wikimedia Foundation, parent company of Wikipedia, announced its five-year strategic plan. It's Wikimedia's first time laying out a roadmap of sorts, and this one represents the collaborative efforts of more than a thousand participants.


http://www.maximumpc.com/article/news/wiki...y_visitors_2015

Who are these "more than a thousand participants"?

QUOTE
A little over 400 million unique visitors drop by the site every month and browser just shy of 18 million articles. There are currently 80,000 active editors, or editors who make at least five edits a month. What Wikipedia is trying to do, then, is double up its traffic and editors over the next four years.


Does the Wikipedia "community" have any say in this, or is it even aware of these "goals"?

This post has been edited by chrisoff:
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Cock-up-over-conspiracy
post
Post #3


Now censored by flckr.com and who else ... ???
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,693
Joined:
Member No.: 9,267



QUOTE
There are currently 80,000 active editors, or editors who make at least five edits a month. What Wikipedia is trying to do, then, is double up its traffic and editors over the next four years.

So what ... they will make 10 edits a months? Doesn't sound so heroic ... what is the ratio of good edits to vandalism and crap? How efficient is it?

How on earth can they just measure a click as something good?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
Jon Awbrey   “Wikipedia Is Sexist”  
Milton Roe   [quote name='Elisa Gabbert' date='22 Feb 2011'] W...  
Jon Awbrey   Wikipedia has been on my mind lately, after hea...  
Jon Awbrey   Just so everyone understands what's going on h...  
Milton Roe   Just so everyone understands what's going on ...  
Text   A blogger writes a blog post that is critical of W...  
thekohser   ...not just random stuff made for laughs... Yeah...  
Text   www.saisathyasai.com/wikipedia/fred bauder court ...  
Jon Awbrey   Now I know what you're thinking — How c...  
Kelly Martin   That's some really nasty dirty pool by Fred. ...  
carbuncle   Here's a suggestion for Gabbert - go here; pos...  
Jon Awbrey   I've moved this to the BLP Forum in hopes of g...  
HRIP7   I've moved this to the BLP Forum in hopes of ...  
Jon Awbrey   [quote name='Jon Awbrey' post='269418' date='Thu ...  
Sylar   I've moved this to the BLP Forum in hopes of...  
Milton Roe   [quote name='HRIP7' post='269420' date='Thu 24th ...  
Jon Awbrey   Since if somebody ever puts up a bio of Fred, I a...  
HRIP7   [quote name='Sylar' post='269450' date='Thu 24th ...  
Somey   ...I am pretty sure that Fred didn't do it out...  
carbuncle   [quote name='HRIP7' post='269420' date='Thu 24th ...  
Jon Awbrey   [quote name='Somey' post='269463' date='Fri 25th ...  
Kelly Martin   The thing that All Normal People understand here ...  
carbuncle   [quote name='Jon Awbrey' post='269524' date='Fri ...  
Milton Roe   YhNgTBlldvM My theory of humor is that it's ...  
Kevin   I've moved this to the BLP Forum in hopes of ...  
Gruntled   It's up to the reasonable folk at WP now - [w...  
Jon Awbrey   Could a global mod please move this thread back to...  
Jon Awbrey   RE: “Wikipedia Is Sexist”  
WikiWatch   I wouldn't want to read a magazine if only 1 ...  
Jon Awbrey   The evils in question are HYPOCRISY and INTIMIDATI...  
Jon Awbrey   RE: “Wikipedia Is Sexist”  
Jon Awbrey   Yes, and a bit more seriously, it's a textbook...  
Jon Awbrey   Yup, the yux jes keep on comin' … Jon ...  
chrisoff   One of Wikipedia's goals for 2015: http://w...  
Milton Roe   One of Wikipedia's goals for 2015: Wheneve...  
chrisoff   Will Malleus (uber male) rise to the rescue of of ...  
chrisoff   Why has a thread discussing “Wikipedia Is Se...  
Jon Awbrey   Why has a thread discussing “Wikipedia Is S...  


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now:
 
     
FORUM WARNING [2] Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/wikipede/public_html/int042kj398.php:242) (Line: 0 of Unknown)