Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,601
Joined: Sun 30th Mar 2008, 4:48pm
Member No.: 5,544
QUOTE(mbz1 @ Sat 31st December 2011, 7:02pm)
Here's one more image of Ashley . The author's name stated as "a1ien2 from United Kingdom User:AshleyVH". The description states: "Photo of myself wearing an aussieBum wonderjock. Bought for the colour rather than for Canada". The image is released in public domain, and is used on one of wikipedias
Group: Contributors
Posts: 303
Joined: Fri 28th Nov 2008, 10:50pm
Member No.: 9,171
The nomination may have been withdrawn, but the drama isn't over. Here we have a proposal to de-sysop Rd232. Surprisingly, Ottava isn't the only person to vote for the motion. However, something makes me think that this proposal is more likely to be carried.
This post has been edited by Eppur si muove: Sun 1st January 2012, 3:07pm
Group: Regulars
Posts: 3,270
Joined: Sun 22nd Jun 2008, 4:41am
From: EN61bw
Member No.: 6,696
QUOTE(Eppur si muove @ Sun 1st January 2012, 9:06am)
The nomination may have been withdrawn, but the drama isn't over. Here we have a proposal to de-sysop Rd232. Surprisingly, Ottava isn't the only person to vote for the motion. However, something makes me think that this proposal is more likely to be carried.
School must be out, as the children are definitely playing in the treehouse.
Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined: Thu 1st Feb 2007, 10:21pm
Member No.: 911
QUOTE(Cedric @ Sun 1st January 2012, 8:11am)
. . . and it was a graphic image, albeit a somewhat blurry one. [SSFW page containing link to NSFW image].
Oh, I didn't know there was a fleshy Wiener shot, too. I thought the image that was paraded around most of the pundit media was this one, which is not terribly more graphic than Ashley's.
Group: Contributors
Posts: 303
Joined: Fri 28th Nov 2008, 10:50pm
Member No.: 9,171
QUOTE(Kelly Martin @ Sun 1st January 2012, 5:20pm)
QUOTE(Eppur si muove @ Sun 1st January 2012, 9:06am)
The nomination may have been withdrawn, but the drama isn't over. Here we have a proposal to de-sysop Rd232. Surprisingly, Ottava isn't the only person to vote for the motion. However, something makes me think that this proposal is more likely to be carried.
School must be out, as the children are definitely playing in the treehouse.
I don't know why Fred the Oyster doesn't come and join us here. After all, contributions such as this, this and this suggest the audience he is seeking to entertain is to be found over here.
So Fred, since you mention parties, would you mind letting us know how much you had to drink last night? Your tolerance may be less than you think.
QUOTE(Eppur si muove @ Sun 1st January 2012, 2:12pm)
QUOTE(Kelly Martin @ Sun 1st January 2012, 5:20pm)
QUOTE(Eppur si muove @ Sun 1st January 2012, 9:06am)
The nomination may have been withdrawn, but the drama isn't over. Here we have a proposal to de-sysop Rd232. Surprisingly, Ottava isn't the only person to vote for the motion. However, something makes me think that this proposal is more likely to be carried.
School must be out, as the children are definitely playing in the treehouse.
I don't know why Fred the Oyster doesn't come and join us here. After all, contributions such as this, this and this suggest the audience he is seeking to entertain is to be found over here.
So Fred, since you mention parties, would you mind letting us know how much you had to drink last night? Your tolerance may be less than you think.
QUOTE(Eppur si muove @ Sun 1st January 2012, 7:12pm)
QUOTE(Kelly Martin @ Sun 1st January 2012, 5:20pm)
QUOTE(Eppur si muove @ Sun 1st January 2012, 9:06am)
The nomination may have been withdrawn, but the drama isn't over. Here we have a proposal to de-sysop Rd232. Surprisingly, Ottava isn't the only person to vote for the motion. However, something makes me think that this proposal is more likely to be carried.
School must be out, as the children are definitely playing in the treehouse.
I don't know why Fred the Oyster doesn't come and join us here. After all, contributions such as this, this and this suggest the audience he is seeking to entertain is to be found over here.
So Fred, since you mention parties, would you mind letting us know how much you had to drink last night? Your tolerance may be less than you think.
QUOTE(Cunningly Linguistic @ Sun 1st January 2012, 7:02pm)
QUOTE(Eppur si muove @ Sun 1st January 2012, 7:12pm)
QUOTE(Kelly Martin @ Sun 1st January 2012, 5:20pm)
QUOTE(Eppur si muove @ Sun 1st January 2012, 9:06am)
The nomination may have been withdrawn, but the drama isn't over. Here we have a proposal to de-sysop Rd232. Surprisingly, Ottava isn't the only person to vote for the motion. However, something makes me think that this proposal is more likely to be carried.
School must be out, as the children are definitely playing in the treehouse.
I don't know why Fred the Oyster doesn't come and join us here. After all, contributions such as this, this and this suggest the audience he is seeking to entertain is to be found over here.
So Fred, since you mention parties, would you mind letting us know how much you had to drink last night? Your tolerance may be less than you think.
None at all as it happens.
Life is far too serious to be treated seriously.
If life isn't so serious, then why don't you drink fucking beer???
(Yes folks, this thread has definitely reached the random youtube point)
QUOTE(Cunningly Linguistic @ Sun 1st January 2012, 7:02pm)
QUOTE(Eppur si muove @ Sun 1st January 2012, 7:12pm)
QUOTE(Kelly Martin @ Sun 1st January 2012, 5:20pm)
QUOTE(Eppur si muove @ Sun 1st January 2012, 9:06am)
The nomination may have been withdrawn, but the drama isn't over. Here we have a proposal to de-sysop Rd232. Surprisingly, Ottava isn't the only person to vote for the motion. However, something makes me think that this proposal is more likely to be carried.
School must be out, as the children are definitely playing in the treehouse.
I don't know why Fred the Oyster doesn't come and join us here. After all, contributions such as this, this and this suggest the audience he is seeking to entertain is to be found over here.
So Fred, since you mention parties, would you mind letting us know how much you had to drink last night? Your tolerance may be less than you think.
None at all as it happens.
Life is far too serious to be treated seriously.
If life isn't so serious, then why don't you drink fucking beer???
My vice is swinging. It doesn't cost as much and you don't have to pee as often.
This post has been edited by Cunningly Linguistic: Mon 2nd January 2012, 12:19am
QUOTE(Cunningly Linguistic @ Mon 2nd January 2012, 12:18am)
QUOTE(SB_Johnny @ Mon 2nd January 2012, 12:15am)
QUOTE(Cunningly Linguistic @ Sun 1st January 2012, 7:02pm)
QUOTE(Eppur si muove @ Sun 1st January 2012, 7:12pm)
QUOTE(Kelly Martin @ Sun 1st January 2012, 5:20pm)
QUOTE(Eppur si muove @ Sun 1st January 2012, 9:06am)
The nomination may have been withdrawn, but the drama isn't over. Here we have a proposal to de-sysop Rd232. Surprisingly, Ottava isn't the only person to vote for the motion. However, something makes me think that this proposal is more likely to be carried.
School must be out, as the children are definitely playing in the treehouse.
I don't know why Fred the Oyster doesn't come and join us here. After all, contributions such as this, this and this suggest the audience he is seeking to entertain is to be found over here.
So Fred, since you mention parties, would you mind letting us know how much you had to drink last night? Your tolerance may be less than you think.
None at all as it happens.
Life is far too serious to be treated seriously.
If life isn't so serious, then why don't you drink fucking beer???
My vice is swinging. It doesn't cost as much and you don't have to pee as often.
Leaders must deal with and accept harassment all the time, yet Fae appears not to be able to handle any sort of harassment. How did someone such as Fae end up in a WMUK position of leadership? Leadership isn't for the timid or the faint of heart.
Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,601
Joined: Sun 30th Mar 2008, 4:48pm
Member No.: 5,544
QUOTE(Michaeldsuarez @ Thu 5th January 2012, 1:53pm)
Leaders must deal with and accept harassment all the time, yet Fae appears not to be able to handle any sort of harassment. How did someone such as Fae end up in a WMUK position of leadership? Leadership isn't for the timid or the faint of heart.
To be fair, he isn't putting himself out as a leader. He is a trustee for a charity.
QUOTE(Michaeldsuarez @ Thu 5th January 2012, 1:53pm)
Leaders must deal with and accept harassment all the time, yet Fae appears not to be able to handle any sort of harassment. How did someone such as Fae end up in a WMUK position of leadership? Leadership isn't for the timid or the faint of heart.
To be fair, he isn't putting himself out as a leader. He is a trustee for a charity.
Could you run through Verifiability not Truth once more?
Group: Members
Posts: 2,972
Joined: Tue 4th Dec 2007, 12:42am
From: The Midlands
Member No.: 4,015
QUOTE(carbuncle @ Thu 5th January 2012, 2:09pm)
QUOTE(Michaeldsuarez @ Thu 5th January 2012, 1:53pm)
Leaders must deal with and accept harassment all the time, yet Fae appears not to be able to handle any sort of harassment. How did someone such as Fae end up in a WMUK position of leadership? Leadership isn't for the timid or the faint of heart.
To be fair, he isn't putting himself out as a leader. He is a trustee for a charity.
and a board member of the company.
I would take issue with the wording. I would say that "People in positions of responsibility must accept that they will be scrutinised." which is different from harassment. Obama tends to be harassed rather than scrutinised - e.g. the Birther movement was one of harassment without a legitimate basis and just because he is a major world leader does not mean that it is legitimate to harass him.
However, the public has a right to be assured that those who are operating in a public role are competent, and as such anyone accepting a position has a duty to demonstrate, within reason, that they are fit and proper.
I would also recognise that Wikipedian interactions rarely seem to represent fair scrutiny, lynching is a fairly popular activity, along with deception and spinning, so it is understandable that any Wikipedian would eventually find it hard to distinguish between legitimate enquiry and harassment. Anyone putting themselves forward within Wikipedia should recognise that harassment is the nature of the game and should have a thick skin or not involve themselves.
Leaders must deal with and accept harassment all the time, yet Fae appears not to be able to handle any sort of harassment. How did someone such as Fae end up in a WMUK position of leadership? Leadership isn't for the timid or the faint of heart.
You know what, though? Delicious and Fred will eventually be unblocked, but Ashley will still be the Wikimedia UK trustee who put his bare, chained-up ass out on the Internet. That will be true forever.