The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> Help

This subforum is for critical evaluation of Wikipedia articles. However, to reduce topic-bloat, please make note of exceptionally poor stubs, lists, and other less attention-worthy material in the Miscellaneous Grab Bag thread. Also, please be aware that agents of the Wikimedia Foundation might use your evaluations to improve the articles in question.

Useful Links: Featured Article CandidatesFeatured Article ReviewArticles for DeletionDeletion Review

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Template:Wikipediahistory, Jimbo & Angela object!
Rootology
post Fri 15th June 2007, 3:12pm
Post #1


Fat Cat
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,489
Joined: Fri 26th Jan 2007, 11:11pm
Member No.: 877



Fireworks start here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk...roposed_rewrite

I just noticed that both of them are wanting the template significantly changed.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jonny Cache
post Fri 15th June 2007, 8:12pm
Post #2


τα δε μοι παθήματα μαθήματα γέγονε
*********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 5,100
Joined: Sat 9th Sep 2006, 1:52am
Member No.: 398

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Rootology @ Fri 15th June 2007, 11:12am) *

Fireworks start here:

Template talk : Wikipediahistory#Proposed rewrite

I just noticed that both of them are wanting the template significantly changed.


This and other recent developments are simply symptoms of the fact the many core elements of Wikipediot Mythology, like One Stop Information Shopping (OSIS) and Neopolitan Point Of View (NPOV), were never really maintainable in the first place, and even the Wikipriesthood is beginning to weary of the contortionist act that it takes to keep up their e-labored fakiry.

Jonny cool.gif

This post has been edited by Jonny Cache: Fri 15th June 2007, 8:59pm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Cedric
post Sat 16th June 2007, 4:39am
Post #3


General Gato
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,648
Joined: Sun 11th Mar 2007, 5:58pm
From: God's Ain Country
Member No.: 1,116

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



Ah yes, Mr. Guru (aka Quack Guru). Can always be relied upon to keep the pot stirring. biggrin.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thekohser
post Sat 16th June 2007, 2:22pm
Post #4


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined: Thu 1st Feb 2007, 10:21pm
Member No.: 911



QUOTE(Cedric @ Sat 16th June 2007, 12:39am) *

Ah yes, Mr. Guru (aka Quack Guru). Can always be relied upon to keep the pot stirring. biggrin.gif

Quite similarly, Angela Beesley can always be relied upon to make conflict-of-interest edits, then claim that she isn't really conflicted.

Greg
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 25th 5 13, 12:28am