FORUM WARNING [2] Division by zero (Line: 2933 of /srcsgcaop/boardclass.php)
Sock Puppetry Destroying Publishing? -
     
 
The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> General Discussion? What's that all about?

This subforum is for general discussion of Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects. For a glossary of terms frequently used in such discussions, please refer to Wikipedia:Glossary. For a glossary of musical terms, see here. Other useful links:

Akahele.orgWikipedia-WatchWikitruthWP:ANWikiEN-L/Foundation-L (mailing lists) • Citizendium forums

> Sock Puppetry Destroying Publishing?
Ottava
post
Post #1


Ãœber Pokemon
********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 2,917
Joined:
Member No.: 7,328



This story about fake book reviews is deeply intertwined with the problems rife on Wikipedia - lots of internet sources that are either produced way too fast (and thus not yet corrected), things rushed and not based on full information, or on shoddy merits.

This is one of the dangers with people who boast about "Web 2.0" (that isn't even a real thing, there is either the internet or not, screw the rest of it). When anonymity dominates and there is no check, crap takes over.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
Eppur si muove
post
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 304
Joined:
Member No.: 9,171



And just like on Wikipedia, meatpuppetry is also a problem. A friend fo mine found a book that plagiarised his website and also Wikipedia. One of the positive reviews of the book was written by a colleague of the "author" who appears in the acknowledgments. Said work colleague has blogged about plagiarism but his scruples about that do not apply when recommending a friend's book.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Ottava
post
Post #3


Ãœber Pokemon
********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 2,917
Joined:
Member No.: 7,328



QUOTE(Eppur si muove @ Tue 4th September 2012, 4:34pm) *

And just like on Wikipedia, meatpuppetry is also a problem. A friend fo mine found a book that plagiarised his website and also Wikipedia. One of the positive reviews of the book was written by a colleague of the "author" who appears in the acknowledgments. Said work colleague has blogged about plagiarism but his scruples about that do not apply when recommending a friend's book.



Adam Smith suggested that the reason why 18th century poets formed cabals to destroy each other and that scientists did not is because the poets had far more to gain and lose. The people didn't really care about the scientists and it was immune.

If you look closely, he had a strong point about human nature. When you can gain popularity/power/money, or whatever else, humans tend to join together to screw each other in any way possible. It no longer becomes merit but greed. I strongly believe in Confucius's meritocracy. However, Confucius was consistently chased out of different kingdoms because of how it prevented certain people from gaining power who do not deserve it.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
DoctorHver
post
Post #4


Junior Member
**

Group: Contributors
Posts: 55
Joined:
Member No.: 4,593



I thought wikipedia was the playground for copyright in-fragments and plagiarism.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post



Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now:
 
     
FORUM WARNING [2] Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/wikipede/public_html/int042kj398.php:242) (Line: 0 of Unknown)