| |
|
  |
Some old SlimVirgin user_talk pages located, More grist for WR counterspies |
|
|
| Daniel Brandt |
Mon 27th August 2007, 10:18pm
|
Postmaster
      
Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,472
Joined: Fri 24th Mar 2006, 12:23am
Member No.: 77

|
I found some of Slim's User_talk archive pages. I don't know if they've been purged of interesting information. I do know that this stuff is disappearing quickly. I don't know why these survived. Maybe they were considered innocent, or perhaps it was a screw-up. There seems to be a couple of different filenaming conventions in use on Slim's archive files, which makes the "screw-up of a cover-up" theory possible. From 2004-11-10 to 2005-03-29:Archive 01Archive 02Archive 03Archive 04Archive 05Archive 06Archive 07From 2006-05-29 to 2007-06-14:Archive 31Archive 32Archive 33Archive 34Archive 35Archive 36Archive 37Archive 38Archive 39Archive 40Archive 41Archive 42Archive 43One hilarious correction: I don't know if Slim herself did this, but I don't think it was an innocent overwrite. On Archive 02, there is a picture of a saxophone player labeled "Playing.jpg" with a caption of "My dogs." That's how I found it today. But I just happened to have a copy of the original pic that was there, before some witch turned her poodle into a saxophone player, and her other dog into a saxophone: Later: Found some more (slightly different filename format was used) From 2005-03-23 to 2006-05-29:Archive 08Archive 09Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12Archive 13Archive 14Archive 15Archive 16Archive 17Archive 18Archive 19Archive 20Archive 21Archive 22Archive 23Archive 24Archive 25Archive 26Archive 27Archive 28Archive 29Archive 30The quickest way to see if Slim replied to any of these comments might be to consult the chronological listing of her contribution history. It doesn't have links in it, but for a quickie lookup to see if there's anything listed that's worth pursuing, here's a repeat of a post I made three weeks ago. (Even if it had links, they probably link to the non-archived talk page of that user, which means they won't work now, and you have to go digging for it the hard way.) ________________ There's a one-meg zip file, 59,002 lines long, of Slim's complete edit history, as it appeared this morning on Wikipedia. It's at http://www.wikipedia-watch.org/slimedit.zip (that filename is pronounced SLIME - DIT, by the way). There are no links; it's a text file with Unix-style line endings. The date format was changed to save space and make it easier for parsing. Here's a six-line sample: CODE 2007-08-05 22:52 Chip Berlet (rv and removed some links that seem to violate BLP, and one that seems to have nothing to do with the topic) 2007-08-05 22:53 m Chip Berlet (->Selected papers, reports, and articles - no need to say they're by him as this is a selected list of his works) 2007-08-05 22:54 m Chip Berlet (->Selected papers, reports, and articles - ditto) 2007-08-05 23:03 m Chip Berlet (->External links - sorry, this link seems okay) 2007-08-05 23:13 m Chip Berlet (->External links - restored some links) 2007-08-05 23:20 Chip Berlet (headers, fixed ref) (top)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Kato |
Mon 27th August 2007, 10:51pm
|

dhd
        
Group: Regulars
Posts: 5,521
Joined: Fri 29th Dec 2006, 8:39pm
Member No.: 767

|
Here's a great post from the first page. Dr. Adam Carr from way back in 2004. It sets the stage for so many future battles. QUOTE Herschelkrustofsky is, sadly, allowed to edit articles. He is a longtime member of the LaRouche cult and a shameless liar and slanderer, and nothing he says or writes here should be believed. Unfortunately the people who run Wikipedia are too gutless to defend their own project by banning him and people like him from participating, or to defend legitimate editors against their wrecking. That is why I have withdrawn from editing all articles except Australian ones, and even there I find Herschelkrustofsky spreading his poison. No doubt I will soon be banned altogether for reverting Herschelkrustofsky's edits. I wish you luck in dealing with him, but I fear Wikipedia's failure to deal with him and other like him will result in the whole project being fatally damaged, which is very sad. Adam 09:47, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC) Carr eventually went completely off the rails and disappeared to some other outlet, shrouded in ignominy having launched too many ridiculous failed campaigns, then getting caught editing his politician boss's bio. Though his vanity article remains. ***** I didn't realise that Slim wrote a featured article on Cambridge University philosopher Sir Bernard Williams. Who was the big wig at Kings college Cambridge from 1979 until 1987. Jayjg's comment on the featured article page is a treat QUOTE Support. Heroic work by SlimVirgin to address all outstanding objections. Jayjg 18:42, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC) 
|
|
|
|
|
|
| jorge |
Mon 27th August 2007, 11:03pm
|
Postmaster
      
Group: On Vacation
Posts: 1,910
Joined: Tue 28th Feb 2006, 11:54am
Member No.: 29

|
QUOTE(Kato @ Mon 27th August 2007, 11:51pm)  Here's a great post from the first page. Dr. Adam Carr from way back in 2004. It sets the stage for so many future battles. QUOTE Herschelkrustofsky is, sadly, allowed to edit articles. He is a longtime member of the LaRouche cult and a shameless liar and slanderer, and nothing he says or writes here should be believed. Unfortunately the people who run Wikipedia are too gutless to defend their own project by banning him and people like him from participating, or to defend legitimate editors against their wrecking. That is why I have withdrawn from editing all articles except Australian ones, and even there I find Herschelkrustofsky spreading his poison. No doubt I will soon be banned altogether for reverting Herschelkrustofsky's edits. I wish you luck in dealing with him, but I fear Wikipedia's failure to deal with him and other like him will result in the whole project being fatally damaged, which is very sad. Adam 09:47, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC) Carr eventually went completely off the rails and disappeared to some other outlet, shrouded in ignominy having launched too many ridiculous failed campaigns, then getting caught editing his politician boss's bio. Though his vanity article remains. It's so bloody obvious that a number of editors already knew SV before she joined Wikipedia from looking at her first talk archive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Daniel Brandt |
Mon 27th August 2007, 11:20pm
|
Postmaster
      
Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,472
Joined: Fri 24th Mar 2006, 12:23am
Member No.: 77

|
I don't know when Slim got into the habit of replying to these comments on that user's own talk page. Was it from the beginning, or was it later? In any case, if you see some interesting comment on these pages, you may want to check that user's own talk page archives for a reply from Slim, probably within a few days later.
I'm happy I found that second dog pic — I downloaded it into the wrong directory on my computer 15 months ago and thought for the longest time that I had accidentally deleted it. Now there's a better chance of finding Slim. Imagine a reporter following a lead, and he finds someone in central Canada who looks about 46 years old, and looks like that pic we have of her, and is seen walking two dogs that look like that, after a long session in front of her Mac. That would be SlimVirgin. She no long has any "plausible deniability" at that point, to use some spy terminology.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Jonny Cache |
Tue 28th August 2007, 3:30am
|

τα δε μοι παθήματα μαθήματα γέγονε
        
Group: Contributors
Posts: 5,100
Joined: Sat 9th Sep 2006, 1:52am
Member No.: 398
WP user page -
talk
check -
contribs

|
QUOTE(blissyu2 @ Mon 27th August 2007, 10:52pm)  Of course, assuming that the 2 dogs are still alive, and she doesn't now have other dogs as well/instead of. Dogs live for what? 10-15 years?
Good pick by Kato that others knew her, and also that she obviously liked one of her professors. All professors have their favourite students, so that's a lead. And it may be worth looking in to what Jorge said, that some people knew her before she started editing.
"Jonny This post has been edited by Jonny Cache: Tue 28th August 2007, 3:32am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
  |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| |