Wikipedia is evil and must be destroyed. Options

[Joseph100]

Wikipedia is evil and must be destroyed. I've made numerous attempts to try to work with them in order to edit and correct glaring factual mistakes, as well as blatant boldface bias on various biographies of Republican officeholders from Illinois.

What I have found is Wikipedia is a complete totally filled with hate filled Marxists children, and tin pot, petty dictators drunk with power, whose concept of fairness is distorted and corrupt and with out control.

So, I am looking for advice on how to go about to diminish, destroy and neutralize Wikipedia.

Any reasonable suggestion will be taken under advisement.

For those who are pro-Wikipedia. All I have to say is this... there is nothing that you could say, do, or argue which would convinced me that Wikipedia has any merit, or good for the body politic or the Internet at large.
It is my sworn belief that Wikipedia is absolutely a cesspool of evil.

Thank you

This post has been edited by Joseph100:

[dtobias]

Wikipedia doesn't let Joseph100 get his way on politically-charged edit wars = Wikipedia is evil and must be destroyed.

I have a simple, elegant proof of this, but unfortunately this margin is too small to contain it.

[Joseph100]

Wikipedia doesn't let Joseph100 get his way on politically-charged edit wars = Wikipedia is evil and must be destroyed.

I have a simple, elegant proof of this, but unfortunately this margin is too small to contain it.

That's your assertion. I submit your proof full of bulldonky. It’s flawed, because it contains insufficient facts and an over simplification analysis which distorts your conclusion. The model is too simpleminded just like those who would like to believe it.

Now, grow up, and take your rose-colored Wiki-glasses off figure out what will happen when the big boys take an interest in Wikipedia.

I am not talking about grand illusion of having articles about Klingon verbs or articles about the controversies revolving around whether Galactica is to make it to Earth.

I'm talking about bare knuckles politics, Chicago style Illinois style politics and because the idiot admins and bureaucrats at Wikipedia think that, they can lock out dialogue. That's not going to stop those who want to protect their people whose biographies are on Wikipedia. This is due to Wikipedia as high rating on Google and Yahoo.

Now if administrators were smart and just follow their own rules and do the right thing (which they seem to can't help themselves and not do), then Wikipedia would be safe, but the administrators and bureaucrats can't help themselves and Wikipedia will be dragged into this bare knuckle political arena, where the stakes are very a very high and destruction of Wikipedia may be a reasonable strategy.

I we can beat this horse to death but I present a better analysis.

Fact:
A lot more Wikipedia editors, administrators, and bureaucrats are liberal zealot Democratic Party wonks.

Fact:
A lot less Wikipedia editors and administrators and hardly any bureaucrats are conservative zealot Republican Party wonks.

Fact:
Politician D's biography is lovingly protected by Liberal zealot Wikiedia editors and bureaucrats.

Fact:
Politician D' biography is savaged by conservatives... but since there is more liberals then conservative wonks, Politician D' bio is untouched.

Fact:
Politician R's biography is lovingly protected by conservative wonks, but there are more Liberal zealot editors and bureaucrats, so politician R’s article is left savaged.

Fact:
Conservatives zealot's try, but fail to change Politican R's savaged biography, due to greater numbers of liberal zealot admins Since most administrators do not enforce regulation even handedly, fairly and without bias. Conservative zeatlots gets gang bang and banned

Conclusion:
Since, within the Wikipedia world, jungle law, the tyranny of the majority is the rule of the wiki land, liberal zelolite wonks squelch and locks out conservative zealot wonks.

So, with Wikipedia high rating on the search engines, as well as the fact that there is no justice to be found at Wikipedia, it then becomes necessary to make an “end run” and destroy or diminished Wikipedia.

Because, Wikipedia has entered the political arena they are now at the mercy of its vulgarities.

Whether this is right, wrong, good, or bad, is irrelevant because all this takes place outside Wikipedia's warm and fuzzy confines, in the REAL WORLD, under rules of REAL human behavior and laws. So, if I were wiki- management, regardless of my political ideology, I would very keen to enforce the regulations evenhandedly and honestly with some integrity.

The fact of the massive problems, complaints, and criticism Wikipedia now receives is proof my assertions above are correct.


So, I would suggest you remove your wiki colored shades, take note of the real world under real rules of human and political behavior, and grow up.

This post has been edited by Joseph100: