FORUM WARNING [2] Division by zero (Line: 2933 of /srcsgcaop/boardclass.php)
Juliet Landau gets "rolled" by WP -
     
 
The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> Discussions in this subforum are hidden from search engines.

However, they are not hidden from automobile engines, including the newer, more "environmentally-friendly" electric and hybrid engines. Also, please note that this subforum is meant to be used for discussion of the actual biographical articles themselves; more generalized discussions of BLP policy should be posted in the General Discussion or Bureaucracy forums.

> Juliet Landau gets "rolled" by WP
EricBarbour
post
Post #1


blah
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 5,919
Joined:
Member No.: 5,066



I'm talking about this, of course.

She had to send her birth certificate to the WMF, just to stop this inane three-year-long squabble.
Yet the moronic editwar continued thereafter.

(Of course, you realize this shit happens for only one reason: Ms. Landau was on two TV shows
that Wiki-twidders obsess over, Buffy and Angel...... (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/hrmph.gif) )

This post has been edited by EricBarbour:
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
Michaeldsuarez
post
Post #2


Ãœber Member
*****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 562
Joined:
From: New York, New York
Member No.: 24,428



Can't they include both dates? Can't they say, "Certain newspapers indicate that Juliet Landau was born in 1965, while Juliet Landau, backed by her birth certificate, claim that she was born in 1972"? What happened to "Verifiability, not truth"? It's not up to Wikipedians to decide what the truth is and to force their version of the "truth" down readers' throats.

This post has been edited by Michaeldsuarez:
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
carbuncle
post
Post #3


Fat Cat
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,601
Joined:
Member No.: 5,544



QUOTE(Michaeldsuarez @ Wed 9th November 2011, 2:43pm) *

Can't they include both dates? Can't they say, "Certain newspapers indicate that Juliet Landau was born in 1965, while Juliet Landau, backed by her birth certificate, claim that she was born in 1972"? What happened to "Verifiability, not truth"? It's not up to Wikipedians to decide what the truth is and to force their version of the "truth" down readers' throats.

"Some newspaper sources, published before Landau's birth in 1972, suggest that she was born in 1965, but her true birth date has been confirmed by an unnamed Wikipedia volunteer viewing an image of Landau's birth certificate sent via email by an unknown person."

This post has been edited by carbuncle:
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Michaeldsuarez
post
Post #4


Ãœber Member
*****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 562
Joined:
From: New York, New York
Member No.: 24,428



QUOTE(carbuncle @ Wed 9th November 2011, 10:43am) *

QUOTE(Michaeldsuarez @ Wed 9th November 2011, 2:43pm) *

Can't they include both dates? Can't they say, "Certain newspapers indicate that Juliet Landau was born in 1965, while Juliet Landau, backed by her birth certificate, claim that she was born in 1972"? What happened to "Verifiability, not truth"? It's not up to Wikipedians to decide what the truth is and to force their version of the "truth" down readers' throats.

"Some newspaper sources, published before Landau's birth in 1972, suggest that she was born in 1965, but her true birth date has been confirmed by an unnamed Wikipedia volunteer viewing an image of Landau's birth certificate sent via email by an unknown person."


I know that it sounds weird, but it's hard to believe that this person could have misplaced seven years of her life. Her website (julietlandau.com, Adobe Flash required) says 1972. What possible motivation can she have to spread misinformation about her birth date?

This post has been edited by Michaeldsuarez:
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thekohser
post
Post #5


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined:
Member No.: 911



QUOTE(Michaeldsuarez @ Wed 9th November 2011, 10:55am) *

What possible motivation can she have to spread misinformation about her birth date?

Clearly, you know nothing about the acting industry.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
EricBarbour   Juliet Landau gets "rolled" by WP  
A Horse With No Name   Wow, I never realized the full depth of DragonflyS...  
everyking   If you read the talk page, it shows that editors f...  
thekohser   ...backed by her birth certificate... Maybe it c...  
Detective   ...backed by her birth certificate... Maybe it ...  
thekohser   [quote name='thekohser' post='288144' date='Wed 9...  
carbuncle   I was curious about this one so I did a little sea...  
gomi   I believe that the only reasonable explanation is ...  
Michaeldsuarez   http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid...  
Silver seren   http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldi...  
carbuncle   I'm sorry, but you're just being ridiculo...  
EricBarbour   I might also point out: this is an awful bio. It...  
Silver seren   Except there is no logical way that that is Landau...  
carbuncle   Except there is no logical way that that is Landa...  
Silver seren   Except there is no logical way that that is Land...  
carbuncle   [quote name='carbuncle' post='288257' date='Thu 1...  
gomi   Please keep my flippin' pseudonym out of Wikip...  
Larry Sanger   Mmm. Drusilla! Crazy, but sexy! Have th...  
dogbiscuit   It is an interesting one though, because it turns ...  


Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now:
 
     
FORUM WARNING [2] Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/wikipede/public_html/int042kj398.php:242) (Line: 0 of Unknown)