FORUM WARNING [2] Division by zero (Line: 2933 of /srcsgcaop/boardclass.php)
Juliet Landau gets "rolled" by WP -
     
 
The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> Discussions in this subforum are hidden from search engines.

However, they are not hidden from automobile engines, including the newer, more "environmentally-friendly" electric and hybrid engines. Also, please note that this subforum is meant to be used for discussion of the actual biographical articles themselves; more generalized discussions of BLP policy should be posted in the General Discussion or Bureaucracy forums.

> Juliet Landau gets "rolled" by WP
EricBarbour
post
Post #1


blah
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 5,919
Joined:
Member No.: 5,066



I'm talking about this, of course.

She had to send her birth certificate to the WMF, just to stop this inane three-year-long squabble.
Yet the moronic editwar continued thereafter.

(Of course, you realize this shit happens for only one reason: Ms. Landau was on two TV shows
that Wiki-twidders obsess over, Buffy and Angel...... (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/hrmph.gif) )

This post has been edited by EricBarbour:
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
Michaeldsuarez
post
Post #2


Ãœber Member
*****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 562
Joined:
From: New York, New York
Member No.: 24,428



http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=459883586

Sorry Silver_seren, but your suspicions are misplaced.

I also like to thank Delicious_carbuncle for exercising responsibility:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=459851016

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=459855379

Silver_seren, I'll ask again: Can you please be more careful before drawing conclusions? You made this mistake before:

http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showt...74&#entry287974
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Silver seren
post
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 470
Joined:
Member No.: 36,940



QUOTE(Michaeldsuarez @ Thu 10th November 2011, 1:37am) *

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=459883586

Sorry Silver_seren, but your suspicions are misplaced.

I also like to thank Delicious_carbuncle for exercising responsibility:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=459851016

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=459855379

Silver_seren, I'll ask again: Can you please be more careful before drawing conclusions? You made this mistake before:

http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showt...74&#entry287974


I'm sorry, but you're just being ridiculous. Me specifically pointing out that it "may potentially have something to do with this or it may be about someone completely different" and that there is "no proof this is Landau though" shows exactly that I was just pointing it out as a possibility to keep an eye on. And another user pointed out other details that showed it definitely wasn't likely, so we move on.

This has nothing to do with BLP and you clearly don't know anything about defamation or libel when you're trying to insinuate every little comment as being as such. I don't know why you're so jumpy about all of this, but either way, you're just dead wrong.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
carbuncle
post
Post #4


Fat Cat
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,601
Joined:
Member No.: 5,544



QUOTE(Silver seren @ Thu 10th November 2011, 5:00am) *

I'm sorry, but you're just being ridiculous. Me specifically pointing out that it "may potentially have something to do with this or it may be about someone completely different" and that there is "no proof this is Landau though" shows exactly that I was just pointing it out as a possibility to keep an eye on. And another user pointed out other details that showed it definitely wasn't likely, so we move on.

Let me try a demonstration to see if you get the point (although I think you're clue-resistant). A recent "news" item:
QUOTE
Actor Hugh Grant, known for films such as "Notting Hill" and "Bridget Jones's Diary," has welcomed a baby girl into his life following a brief affair with an unidentified woman, his spokeswoman said on Tuesday.
Landau is a woman and, given her age, presumably fertile. Would you think it was acceptable to post:
QUOTE
Thanks to Carbuncle on Wikipedia Review, there's this Reuters articles that may potentially have something to do with this or it may be about someone completely different, but: Hugh Grant is new father of baby girl. No proof this is Landau though. Is she living in Los Angeles right now? Silverseren
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
EricBarbour   Juliet Landau gets "rolled" by WP  
A Horse With No Name   Wow, I never realized the full depth of DragonflyS...  
everyking   If you read the talk page, it shows that editors f...  
Michaeldsuarez   Can't they include both dates? Can't they ...  
thekohser   ...backed by her birth certificate... Maybe it c...  
Detective   ...backed by her birth certificate... Maybe it ...  
thekohser   [quote name='thekohser' post='288144' date='Wed 9...  
carbuncle   Can't they include both dates? Can't they...  
Michaeldsuarez   Can't they include both dates? Can't the...  
thekohser   What possible motivation can she have to spread m...  
carbuncle   I was curious about this one so I did a little sea...  
gomi   I believe that the only reasonable explanation is ...  
EricBarbour   I might also point out: this is an awful bio. It...  
Silver seren   Except there is no logical way that that is Landau...  
carbuncle   Except there is no logical way that that is Landa...  
Silver seren   Except there is no logical way that that is Land...  
carbuncle   [quote name='carbuncle' post='288257' date='Thu 1...  
gomi   Please keep my flippin' pseudonym out of Wikip...  
Larry Sanger   Mmm. Drusilla! Crazy, but sexy! Have th...  
dogbiscuit   It is an interesting one though, because it turns ...  


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now:
 
     
FORUM WARNING [2] Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/wikipede/public_html/int042kj398.php:242) (Line: 0 of Unknown)