$100,000,000, Is it all in Jimbo's head, and if not, how much do I get? Options

[Somey]

It started out with this e-mail from Jimbo to WikiEN-L, in which he wrote:

Dream big. Imagine there existed a budget of $100 million to purchase copyrights to be made available under a free license. What would you like to see purchased and released under a free license? ...I was recently asked this question by someone who is potentially in a position to make this happen...

Soon after, it was mentioned on Slashdot, and has since made it into the general purpose IT magazines (PC Mag, Computerworld, etc.). It could conceivably make it into the mainstream media, as early as this week.

The response (mostly on Slashdot) has been quite extensive. People have suggested all sorts of things, including the song "Happy Birthday," the entire Penguin Classics Library, the Lexis-Nexus database, and so on. Others have suggested using the money to fund a lobbying effort in support of copyright reform, though that presumably would be a rather US-centric approach to say the least. In other news, a later e-mail on WikiEN-L from "Stan Shebs" speculated that the would-be donor must be Google, seeing as how they're getting into this sort of thing too (think Google Books), and an entry in the SEO Round Table somewhere suggested that Jimbo had visited Google HQ in person shortly beforehand. I think Jimbo might have mentioned it himself somewhere, but I'm deuced if I can find that right now either.

The more recent stories have carried this quote, from roughly two weeks later (boldface mine):

After contemplating what we would like to see made free, we will begin a project of finding ways to make this happen.

Well, that's not what he originally said, is it?

As we all know, it's our duty here at Wikipedia Review to try and figure out the underlying sinister motive behind whatever Jimbo and the Gang happen to be doing at any given time. In this case, I can think of several possibilities:

1. Jimbo needs cash. Needless to say, the "administrative overhead" of finding the copyright holders, making offers, and disbursing the funds would be quite considerable indeed. Jimbo's a former options trader, and knows all the tricks required to ensure that he'd get the highest legal percentage. Mind you, this is just idle speculation!

2. He's borrowing Microsoft's tactics. What Bill Gates & Co. often do is tell the world they're going to include a feature in the next version of Windows one or two years in advance. Then, any company that's currently working on a third party solution to that feature loses shareholder value (think disk-defrag, personal firewall, text-to-speech, that sort of thing), and Microsoft can then buy that company (and their solution) for less what it would cost them to build it themselves. So, if Wikimedia buys a bunch of copyrights in order to "free" them, speculation will abound as to what they're going to "free," driving down the values of companies that are busy creating new content right now in competition with such properties, and who would be harmed by the massive influx of newly-"freed" public domain content that might compete with whatever they happen to be producing. Those companies could then be bought, presumably by Google, for a lot less than they're worth now. Mind you, on the face of it, this seems completely illogical!

3. It's a smokescreen. For what, we don't know - that's why they call it a "smokescreen"! But it's always conceivable that Jimbo has been up to something, something bad, which might come to light at some point soon, and it's always nice to have a more positive distraction story or two going around to help cover it up. (Presumably if this were the case, then we'd have to assume that the $100 million is all in Jimbo's head.) This could even be Jimbo's way of trying to steal some thunder from the Citizendium launch. There's also been a lot of coverage of Wikipedia's porn content lately. Or, it might even be that he's worried about the plagiarism issue getting some "legs" in the mass media... Mind you, I'm just guessing at what it could be!

4. He's insane. On some level, Jimbo seems to believe that buying copyrights in order to "free" them will lead to some sort of modern intellectual renaissance, in which everyone who wants to obtain specialized knowledge about a subject will, in fact, do so as long as they don't have to shell out the usual $30 or $300 or $3,000 they would normally have to part with in order to get their hands on the printed material. In effect, this suggests that someone who wants to become, say, a physicist, literary critic, automobile designer, or computer technician is only being held back by the price tag of whatever textbook, literary work, or maintenance manual they might need to help them along. Aside from demonstrating an unrealistic view of human motivational behavior, this might suggest that Jimbo has little regard for quintessentially human vocations such as teaching, tutoring, and perhaps bookselling. Mind you, I'm sure Jimbo has nothing against such people personally!

Can anyone come up with any other possibilities? I have to get some sleep now.

[Somey]

Ah, but this isn't electromagnetism! Maybe it's time for Jimbo to review Everyking's case? I still think the whole "offer" thing was taken completely out of context, and none of them should have assumed bad faith on his part, considering that he'd never done that before, and that if the deleted info hadn't contained personal info, it would have simply made the requester look foolish.

Back to the point, though. Everyone knows about "Wikiversity," right? Obviously it isn't a particularly workable concept, but just the name "Wikiversity" is indicative of a new and somewhat alarming attitude, in my opinion. I realize there are "open universities" like the Phoenix Online University and so on, that use the web as delivery methods for coursework, but that's still a long way from the idea that an academic institution can be created out of random electrons by mostly anonymous contributors.

Hopefully it will fail miserably, but in the meantime, it's disturbing, and I think it says something about the people who are doing it.