This post and the next are a couple of memorable — well, I remember them, anyway — comments that I posted in response to a column by Padraig Reidy in
The Guardian.
QUOTE(Newsfeed @ Thu 29th January 2009, 3:48am)
QUOTE
de ja vu
all over again
all over again
all over again
de ja vu
a lover again
a lover again
a lover again
de ja vu
a lover o' gain
a lover o' gain
a lover o' gain
yet another yet another yet another month long munch song much wrong
spate of same ol same ol same ol nooz 2 riddle a diddle a widdle body bout
duh oh so oh so oh so good intentions o' jimbo come to come to come to zip
and you fall for it every time …
Ja³Short Version. Technoir Journalists need to start reading
The Wikipedia Review if they want to stay ahead of the curve on Jimbo UnLtd's latest con. These "new" proposals, the seasonal reruns of flags that get sent up the flagpole on a recurring basis — in the shape they are currently coming through the Wikipediot wringer — will actually make things worse than before. Surprise, surprise.
Jon Awbrey
29 Jan 2009, 1:09pm
responds with its Costumary Drumbeat of Ante-Censorship "Comment Is Free" Hypocrisy: "This comment has been removed by a moderator. Replies may also be deleted."
Meta-Templates For Meta-Con-Templation, If I've Said This Once, I'll Say It 10³ Times
