On AccountabilityTemplate 1QUOTE(Jonny Cache @ Mon 18th February 2008, 11:43pm)
There is no right of anonymous speech.
Wikipediots need to get out of that Wikipedia Romper Room and spend some time in the Real World.
People allow pseudonyms in AA meetings and internet chat rooms, but if the members of that AA group or chat room start publishing a newspaper that impacts on anyone's real life, in or out of the group, then they abandon that courtesy once and for all.
Template 2QUOTE(Jonny Cache @ Wed 19th March 2008, 9:26pm)
Try to get this straight —
- If you insist on having an impact on another person's life — by word or by deed — then the person so impacted is going to ask Who Said That or Who Did That, and you have made it that person's business to find out.
- People who live in the Real World do not use the words Harass or Stalk to describe an inquiry into the facts of the matter regarding Who Said That or Who Did That.
- There are many situations under which the facts of the matter regarding Who Said That or Who Did That are None Of Your Damn Business, and people are quite right to tell you so.
- But — and it's a BIG BUT — GOTO 1.
This post has been edited by Jonny Cache: