 User Sigma1986 at Commons, Uploading illegal material and still at large |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Text |
Post
#1
|
|
Senior Member  Group: Contributors Posts: 491 Joined: Member No.: 15,107  |
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Log/Sigma1986
The first files he uploaded were images of underage femalia genitalia, however the account was never blocked. In fact, some of his images managed to slip through some foreign language Wikipedias in the relevant pages about female anatomy, and remained there for some time before being detected. After they were deleted, the files were re-uploaded. By reading between the lines it seems that the account belongs to a now over-18 woman who took the pictures herself while she was young; or a boyfriend who took pictures of the girlfriend. In theory. In reality, it could just be yet another fake. |
   |
 
|
  |
Replies
| Text |
Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member Group: Contributors Posts: 491 Joined: Member No.: 15,107 |
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:...sviluppo_05.jpg
QUOTE This image portrays the genitals of an underaged female? I'm not sure that is entirely appropriate. 88.88.52.7 01:08, 17 March 2011 (UTC) Speedy delete The intention is, I'm sure, educational and there's no evidence of any connection to child abuse. However, I think this image is very likely to fall foul of the law in the US where the Commons is hosted. --Simonxag (talk) 01:43, 17 March 2011 (UTC) Deleted: Illegal under child pornography laws of US where Commons is hosted. Also contacted WMF to get a developer purge if necessary. Dcoetzee (talk) 03:14, 17 March 2011 (UTC) The developer purge never arrived? |
|
|
|
| Web Fred |
Post
#3
|
|
Pervert & Swinger Group: Contributors Posts: 739 Joined: From: Manchester, UK Member No.: 17,141 |
QUOTE(Text @ Mon 16th April 2012, 6:52pm)  http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:...sviluppo_05.jpg QUOTE This image portrays the genitals of an underaged female? I'm not sure that is entirely appropriate. 88.88.52.7 01:08, 17 March 2011 (UTC) Speedy delete The intention is, I'm sure, educational and there's no evidence of any connection to child abuse. However, I think this image is very likely to fall foul of the law in the US where the Commons is hosted. --Simonxag (talk) 01:43, 17 March 2011 (UTC) Deleted: Illegal under child pornography laws of US where Commons is hosted. Also contacted WMF to get a developer purge if necessary. Dcoetzee (talk) 03:14, 17 March 2011 (UTC) The developer purge never arrived? It does boil my bum, but naked, intimate photos of kids does not necessarily make them porn. Though it does have to be said that perhaps there are worse places to put them than Commons. Context and usage is every thing. |
|
|
|
| Detective |
Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member Group: Contributors Posts: 331 Joined: Member No.: 35,179 |
QUOTE(Web Fred @ Mon 16th April 2012, 7:58pm) perhaps there are worse places to put them than Commons. Unlikely, because they are easy to find there and can be freely re-used even in the unlikely event that the sort of site that might re-use them is worried about copyright. QUOTE Context and usage is every thing. OK, so if they're re-used in a pro-paedophile article or an article on some particularly revolting sexula practice that will be fine? (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/yecch.gif) |
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
Text User Sigma1986 at Commons 
Web Fred
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Log/Sig... Text
I haven't seen them, but the user specified ... 
Web Fred
perhaps there are worse places to put them than ... Text
As long as nobody sees the picture, or doesn... Text
If you were the father of the three kids and saw... Web Fred
If you were the father of the three kids and sa... Proabivouac
In any case, I'm probably the wrong person to... |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: |