FORUM WARNING [2] Division by zero (Line: 2933 of /srcsgcaop/boardclass.php)
Michael Suarez, Sock Hunter -
     
 
The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> Help

This forum is for discussing specific Wikipedia editors, editing patterns, and general efforts by those editors to influence or direct content in ways that might not be in keeping with Wikipedia policy. Please source your claims and provide links where appropriate. For a glossary of terms frequently used when discussing Wikipedia and related projects, please refer to Wikipedia:Glossary.

> Michael Suarez, Sock Hunter
Ottava
post
Post #1


Ãœber Pokemon
********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 2,917
Joined:
Member No.: 7,328



Here is his claim: "This page is intended to gather information about the possibility that Cupco is a sockpuppet of Dualus and Nrcprm2026."

Well, Mikey, you were right.

Nrcprm2026 and Dualus are not two big sock masters, but one REALLY big sock master.

Here is some evidence to help you out: they both chimed in after I showed that their claims to have an FA while banned were bs and they were stealing from my grand achievement. (James Salsman was deemed nrcprm2026 and Paum89 was Dualus)



It always feels nice to be vindicated, no? (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/smile.gif)

This post has been edited by Ottava:
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
Michaeldsuarez
post
Post #2


Ãœber Member
*****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 562
Joined:
From: New York, New York
Member No.: 24,428



QUOTE(Michaeldsuarez @ Thu 15th November 2012, 12:01am) *

http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showuser=76279

He has an account here named "jsalsman". The Wikipedia Review was down during most of October, so I could've use jsalsman's WR posts as evidence. For example, there's jsalsman's thread about "Survival sex":

http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=37264

jslaman revised the article as "Weltoners":

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Weltoners

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contr.../85.230.127.113

But then there's this post:

http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?act=findpost&pid=303177

jsalsman complained about a graph that Fae removed. Who made the graph? An user who came out of the blue:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/CLDunlap

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:...utions/CLDunlap

The "CLDunlap" account was created about forty hours after "Weltoners" was blocked:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...ser%3AWeltoners

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...User%3ACLDunlap

Coincidence? No, I don't believe so. Weltoners = CLDunlap = jsalsman


Mr. Sockpuppeteer has returned to the topic of "survival sex":

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=528088733
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post



Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now:
 
     
FORUM WARNING [2] Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/wikipede/public_html/int042kj398.php:242) (Line: 0 of Unknown)