FORUM WARNING [2] Division by zero (Line: 2933 of /srcsgcaop/boardclass.php)
$100,000,000 -
     
 
The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> General Discussion? What's that all about?

This subforum is for general discussion of Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects. For a glossary of terms frequently used in such discussions, please refer to Wikipedia:Glossary. For a glossary of musical terms, see here. Other useful links:

Akahele.orgWikipedia-WatchWikitruthWP:ANWikiEN-L/Foundation-L (mailing lists) • Citizendium forums

> $100,000,000, Is it all in Jimbo's head, and if not, how much do I get?
Somey
post
Post #1


Can't actually moderate (or even post)
*********

Group: Moderators
Posts: 11,816
Joined:
From: Dreamland
Member No.: 275



It started out with this e-mail from Jimbo to WikiEN-L, in which he wrote:

QUOTE
Dream big. Imagine there existed a budget of $100 million to purchase copyrights to be made available under a free license. What would you like to see purchased and released under a free license? ...I was recently asked this question by someone who is potentially in a position to make this happen...

Soon after, it was mentioned on Slashdot, and has since made it into the general purpose IT magazines (PC Mag, Computerworld, etc.). It could conceivably make it into the mainstream media, as early as this week.

The response (mostly on Slashdot) has been quite extensive. People have suggested all sorts of things, including the song "Happy Birthday," the entire Penguin Classics Library, the Lexis-Nexus database, and so on. Others have suggested using the money to fund a lobbying effort in support of copyright reform, though that presumably would be a rather US-centric approach to say the least. In other news, a later e-mail on WikiEN-L from "Stan Shebs" speculated that the would-be donor must be Google, seeing as how they're getting into this sort of thing too (think Google Books), and an entry in the SEO Round Table somewhere suggested that Jimbo had visited Google HQ in person shortly beforehand. I think Jimbo might have mentioned it himself somewhere, but I'm deuced if I can find that right now either.

The more recent stories have carried this quote, from roughly two weeks later (boldface mine):
QUOTE
After contemplating what we would like to see made free, we will begin a project of finding ways to make this happen.

Well, that's not what he originally said, is it?

As we all know, it's our duty here at Wikipedia Review to try and figure out the underlying sinister motive behind whatever Jimbo and the Gang happen to be doing at any given time. In this case, I can think of several possibilities:

1. Jimbo needs cash. Needless to say, the "administrative overhead" of finding the copyright holders, making offers, and disbursing the funds would be quite considerable indeed. Jimbo's a former options trader, and knows all the tricks required to ensure that he'd get the highest legal percentage. Mind you, this is just idle speculation!

2. He's borrowing Microsoft's tactics. What Bill Gates & Co. often do is tell the world they're going to include a feature in the next version of Windows one or two years in advance. Then, any company that's currently working on a third party solution to that feature loses shareholder value (think disk-defrag, personal firewall, text-to-speech, that sort of thing), and Microsoft can then buy that company (and their solution) for less what it would cost them to build it themselves. So, if Wikimedia buys a bunch of copyrights in order to "free" them, speculation will abound as to what they're going to "free," driving down the values of companies that are busy creating new content right now in competition with such properties, and who would be harmed by the massive influx of newly-"freed" public domain content that might compete with whatever they happen to be producing. Those companies could then be bought, presumably by Google, for a lot less than they're worth now. Mind you, on the face of it, this seems completely illogical!

3. It's a smokescreen. For what, we don't know - that's why they call it a "smokescreen"! But it's always conceivable that Jimbo has been up to something, something bad, which might come to light at some point soon, and it's always nice to have a more positive distraction story or two going around to help cover it up. (Presumably if this were the case, then we'd have to assume that the $100 million is all in Jimbo's head.) This could even be Jimbo's way of trying to steal some thunder from the Citizendium launch. There's also been a lot of coverage of Wikipedia's porn content lately. Or, it might even be that he's worried about the plagiarism issue getting some "legs" in the mass media... Mind you, I'm just guessing at what it could be!

4. He's insane. On some level, Jimbo seems to believe that buying copyrights in order to "free" them will lead to some sort of modern intellectual renaissance, in which everyone who wants to obtain specialized knowledge about a subject will, in fact, do so as long as they don't have to shell out the usual $30 or $300 or $3,000 they would normally have to part with in order to get their hands on the printed material. In effect, this suggests that someone who wants to become, say, a physicist, literary critic, automobile designer, or computer technician is only being held back by the price tag of whatever textbook, literary work, or maintenance manual they might need to help them along. Aside from demonstrating an unrealistic view of human motivational behavior, this might suggest that Jimbo has little regard for quintessentially human vocations such as teaching, tutoring, and perhaps bookselling. Mind you, I'm sure Jimbo has nothing against such people personally!

Can anyone come up with any other possibilities? I have to get some sleep now.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
Somey
post
Post #2


Can't actually moderate (or even post)
*********

Group: Moderators
Posts: 11,816
Joined:
From: Dreamland
Member No.: 275



So what's the most likely scenario, then? That a super-rich guy somewhere (not necessarily Calacanis) is trying to lure Jimbo Wales and his partners into making a splashy deal that would give him a piece of Wikipedia, so as to turn it into a money-maker that they could scoop adbucks out of with little or no effort? Why wouldn't Jimbo just do that himself?

Naaah, something else is going on here... I don't see this as some sort of long con at all - it's more like a gradual feeling-out process with the cultists. He'll continue to float "trial balloons" in front of everyone until eventually they become so used to the idea of commercialization, they won't really care much when it actually happens. Jimbo is just trying to prevent mass defections, which is probably what would happen if he just up and did it one day out of the blue.

Mind you, this was before the recent spate of bad press over plagiarism, viruses, "Intellipedia" (which probably didn't seem like bad press to him, but I suspect it played quite badly in Europe/Africa/Asia), and various anecdotal inaccuracy stories that keep popping up. Stuff like that scares away investors and big-money donors, even as the Alexa rank keeps climbing. I expect Jimbo to stay very tight-lipped on this $100M thing for the immediate future, and I wouldn't be at all surprised if we never hear about it again.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jonny Cache
post
Post #3


τα δε μοι παθήματα μαθήματα γέγονε
*********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 5,100
Joined:
Member No.: 398



QUOTE(Somey @ Tue 21st November 2006, 12:39am) *

So what's the most likely scenario, then? That a super-rich guy somewhere (not necessarily Calacanis) is trying to lure Jimbo Wales and his partners into making a splashy deal that would give him a piece of Wikipedia, so as to turn it into a money-maker that they could scoop adbucks out of with little or no effort? Why wouldn't Jimbo just do that himself?

Naaah, something else is going on here... I don't see this as some sort of long con at all - it's more like a gradual feeling-out process with the cultists. He'll continue to float "trial balloons" in front of everyone until eventually they become so used to the idea of commercialization, they won't really care much when it actually happens. Jimbo is just trying to prevent mass defections, which is probably what would happen if he just up and did it one day out of the blue.

Mind you, this was before the recent spate of bad press over plagiarism, viruses, "Intellipedia" (which probably didn't seem like bad press to him, but I suspect it played quite badly in Europe/Africa/Asia), and various anecdotal inaccuracy stories that keep popping up. Stuff like that scares away investors and big-money donors, even as the Alexa rank keeps climbing. I expect Jimbo to stay very tight-lipped on this $100M thing for the immediate future, and I wouldn't be at all surprised if we never hear about it again.


I was viewing it more fish-eyed than eagle-eyed as being a part of the general schmooze -- just another piece of ambience creation and atmosphere setting -- cultivating that Supper Club Intimation of big money on the move for just the right Wiki-Philanth-Roper to put into play.

I started thinking along these lines a few weeks back when I saw yet another story on the local news about some Senior Citizen of the Griftedest Generation who sent $20,000 in cold hard cash by Featheral Xpress to some address in Phoenix because some guy on the phone said she had won $10 million from Publishers' Shearinghouse, and, like she said, "But he sounded so convincing on the phone". I was right in the middle of exclaiming "Just how gullible can some folks be!?" when I reflected for a moment on how much of my time and effort I had been conned into x-spending on Wikipedia, all for the sake of a really good line.

Since that time I've been contemplating the ways that the Wikipedia-Citizendium game seems very much like some kind of Intellectual Pyramid Scheme. A couple of distinguishing marks -- if you'll excuse the expression -- of a long-lasting pyramid scheme are these: (1) a steady influx of newbies who have yet to tumble to the game, and (2) a mechanism to efflux from the system and to render harmless the marks who have started to ask too many questions.

Jonny (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/cool.gif)

This post has been edited by Jonny Cache:
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post



Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now:
 
     
FORUM WARNING [2] Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/wikipede/public_html/int042kj398.php:242) (Line: 0 of Unknown)