|
Help
This forum is for discussing specific Wikipedia editors, editing patterns, and general efforts by those editors to influence or direct content in ways that might not be in keeping with Wikipedia policy. Please source your claims and provide links where appropriate. For a glossary of terms frequently used when discussing Wikipedia and related projects, please refer to Wikipedia:Glossary.
|
|
Should there be a category for admin sockpuppets, Bishonem refuses to have hers in a category |
|
|
chrisoff |
|
Member
Group: Contributors
Posts: 199
Joined:
Member No.: 17,248
|
To Bishonen on her talk page "Would you mind creating a category for your alt-accounts/sockpuppets? It's hard to keep track of them all. Thanks," http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=428077150Some of her sockpuppets: (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/evilgrin.gif) User:Little Stupid User:Bishzilla User:Bishapod User:Bish and chips User:Maxypode User:Ka of Catherine de Burgh User:Darwinbish User:Bishzilla/Bishzilla diet User:Bishonen/Bishapod User:Baby Stupid User:Darwinfish This post has been edited by chrisoff:
|
|
|
|
Ron Ritzman |
|
Neophyte
Group: Contributors
Posts: 19
Joined:
Member No.: 10,523
|
|
|
|
|
Ron Ritzman |
|
Neophyte
Group: Contributors
Posts: 19
Joined:
Member No.: 10,523
|
QUOTE(chrisoff @ Tue 10th May 2011, 1:45pm) To Bishonen on her talk page Some of her sockpuppets: (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/evilgrin.gif) User:Bishzilla This one is actually used as an example of a "humor account" at WP:SOCK#LEGIT.
|
|
|
|
Silver seren |
|
Senior Member
Group: Contributors
Posts: 470
Joined:
Member No.: 36,940
|
QUOTE(Michaeldsuarez @ Wed 11th May 2011, 1:29am) QUOTE(Ron Ritzman @ Wed 11th May 2011, 1:45am) This one is actually used as an example of a "humor account" at WP:SOCK#LEGIT. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=405837433Was there a discussion or consensus for this new exception? I've been looking for one, but I have yet to find it. If someone wants to take the time, you might want to check when that part was added in and by whom. If it was added by Bishonen or one of his socks, well...that says more than enough right there.
|
|
|
|
melloden |
|
.
Group: Contributors
Posts: 450
Joined:
Member No.: 34,482
|
QUOTE(Silver seren @ Wed 11th May 2011, 2:59am) QUOTE(Michaeldsuarez @ Wed 11th May 2011, 1:29am) QUOTE(Ron Ritzman @ Wed 11th May 2011, 1:45am) This one is actually used as an example of a "humor account" at WP:SOCK#LEGIT. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=405837433Was there a discussion or consensus for this new exception? I've been looking for one, but I have yet to find it. If someone wants to take the time, you might want to check when that part was added in and by whom. If it was added by Bishonen or one of his socks, well...that says more than enough right there. Nope, by Jehochman. I think it's one of those convention things--after all, the community has tolerated such accounts. Whether for better or for worse, is another story altogether. I don't know why this is such a big deal to you, Silver. Why make Wikipedia look more legitimate than it really is? If someone wants to have a confusingly long list of "humor" accounts, what's it to you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| |