What we've got here is yet another P&G from the same Porchesian litterature. It disporks the classical syn-tactics of Double Speak, the language in which all double standards are written, and it falls write in line with that utterly confabulous post*mudern genre that includes
WP:IAR and
WP:NBD. Wikipilgrims and Wikipledges are constantly admonsished to doublespeak the doublespeak in hushed and reverent tones, with all due mumble-jumbled mystification of its "long tradition" (length matters) and its "deep and subtle meaning" (DASM), a textual macramé rapped up in paralogical knots and hyper-liturgical hermenooses that can of course be untangled for the masses by no one short (length matters) of the inner cyclopedia of high priests and pythonesses.
Etc., Etc., Etc.,
Jonny (IMG:
smilys0b23ax56/default/cool.gif)
This post has been edited by Jonny Cache: