QUOTE(Alex @ Tue 28th April 2009, 3:33pm)
Personally, I wouldn't touch Wikiquote, neither the English or Simple English version. I don't really do article work on Simple, but leave it up to those who do. I think it would be good if Simple English Wikipedia's purpose was redefined so it fitted within the criteria for Wikipedia Schools. Simple quality versions of articles such as *cough* Christianity, Henry VIII, and all the vital articles should be the priority. None of those sex position articles, or random asteroids or Romanian rivers. Though of course, articles on sex would probably be necessary for use in high school.
Simple English Wikipedia, I believe, has a strong future that should not be vetoed by a vote on meta wiki. I cannot see any future for Simple English Wikiquote.
I agree. I cannot see the point of a Simple English Wikiquote at all.
But with Simple English, I can sort of see a future for the project. Not as Simple English but, as you say, for schools.
This would need a complete restructuring of the community, though, and the removal of the likes of Eptalon, who thinks he owns the project (see any of his various statements where he tries to force his view on others).