The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Tortuous Wikipedia Rules Require Expert - O'Dwyer's PR News (blog)
Newsfeed
post Wed 25th January 2012, 4:19pm
Post #1


Postmaster General
********

Group: Bots
Posts: 3,272
Joined: Mon 3rd Sep 2007, 9:29pm
Member No.: 2,885



[url="http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&fd=R&usg=AFQjCNHV3S9zF8MEoKzUXvLpYkoGL_Zu_Q&url=http://www.odwyerpr.com/blog/index.php?/archives/3911-Tortuous-Wikipedia-Rules-Require-Expert.html"][img]http://nt0.ggpht.com/news/tbn/fIFLnh3nSx5hZM/6.jpg[/img]
O'Dwyer's PR News (blog)[/url]
<img alt="" height="1" width="1" />Tortuous [b]Wikipedia Rules Require Expert[/b]
O'Dwyer's PR News (blog)
The criticism being heaped on Wikipedia by PR pros on a Facebook page (CREWE) has put the focus on writers who work full time on correcting WP entries or starting new subject areas. Their advice, with which we concur after a number of attempts to place ...



View the article
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thekohser
post Wed 25th January 2012, 5:41pm
Post #2


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined: Thu 1st Feb 2007, 10:21pm
Member No.: 911



Jack is quite relentless on this. He's fired up, that's for sure.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
EricBarbour
post Wed 25th January 2012, 10:09pm
Post #3


blah
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 5,919
Joined: Mon 25th Feb 2008, 2:31am
Member No.: 5,066

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(thekohser @ Wed 25th January 2012, 9:41am) *

Jack is quite relentless on this. He's fired up, that's for sure.

Hopefully he'll get some other PR people moving, and they will start pressuring the WMF and Wales
The Glorious to make up a real policy for paid editing. It appears the only way to change Wikipedia
is via the repeated application of massive public embarrassment.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Cedric
post Thu 26th January 2012, 1:08am
Post #4


General Gato
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,648
Joined: Sun 11th Mar 2007, 5:58pm
From: God's Ain Country
Member No.: 1,116

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(EricBarbour @ Wed 25th January 2012, 4:09pm) *

It appears the only way to change Wikipedia is via the repeated application of massive public embarrassment.

No. Jimbo, Sue and many of the sinecure-suckers at the WMF are capable of embarrassment or deep concern because they have actual incomes and revenue streams that are affected by WP's reputation. The Frei Kultur Kinder that have the actual run of WP have no such concerns, although they are certainly capable of getting into a royal panic about having their true agendas or their "IRL" identities exposed. It would not occur to them that they ought to feel embarrassment, however. Within the cocoon of their insane and insular little wikiverse, they are just as right as right can be.

The WMF can urge, cajole, inform or menace the Frei Kultur Kinder. It can even attempt the impossible by trying to reason with them. But it cannot order or require them to do anything beyond those few cases that fall under "WP:OFFICE." In the end, the WMF can put up increasingly expensive Potemkin villages to divert the public, but they have no power to bring any meaningful reform to WP, scandals and embarrassments notwithstanding.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 21st 9 17, 9:28pm