PaoloNapolitano : It's my turn now, PaoloNapolitano takes me to AN/I Options

[Zoloft]

PaoloNapolitano continues his crusade against Wikipedia Review by taking me, a mere mouse, to the dramaboards.

Result? People accuse me of being less than collegial. Well, maybe. I'm willing to listen to criticism. I'll use less vinegar and more buzz words next time. Wikipedians love buzz words!

PaoloNapolitano: join us here and see we're not all evil.

[melloden]

PaoloNapolitano continues his crusade against Wikipedia Review by taking me, a mere mouse, to the dramaboards.

Result? People accuse me of being less than collegial. Well, maybe. I'm willing to listen to criticism. I'll use less vinegar and more buzz words next time. Wikipedians love buzz words!

PaoloNapolitano: join us here and see we're not all evil.

Maybe I'm being a little too much of a Wikipedia-game-player, but it seems that PaoloNapolitano has a suspiciously experienced start.

Aside from those curiously deleted edits, isn't this a tad peculiar for a new user? He knows the lingo pretty well too.

[radek]

PaoloNapolitano continues his crusade against Wikipedia Review by taking me, a mere mouse, to the dramaboards.

Result? People accuse me of being less than collegial. Well, maybe. I'm willing to listen to criticism. I'll use less vinegar and more buzz words next time. Wikipedians love buzz words!

PaoloNapolitano: join us here and see we're not all evil.

Maybe I'm being a little too much of a Wikipedia-game-player, but it seems that PaoloNapolitano has a suspiciously experienced start.

Aside from those curiously deleted edits, isn't this a tad peculiar for a new user? He knows the lingo pretty well too.

Oh, definitely in the "sock, just don't know whose sock" category.

[Sydney Bluegum]

PaoloNapolitano continues his crusade against Wikipedia Review by taking me, a mere mouse, to the dramaboards.

Result? People accuse me of being less than collegial. Well, maybe. I'm willing to listen to criticism. I'll use less vinegar and more buzz words next time. Wikipedians love buzz words!

PaoloNapolitano: join us here and see we're not all evil.

Maybe I'm being a little too much of a Wikipedia-game-player, but it seems that PaoloNapolitano has a suspiciously experienced start.

Aside from those curiously deleted edits, isn't this a tad peculiar for a new user? He knows the lingo pretty well too.

Oh, definitely in the "sock, just don't know whose sock" category.

PaoloNapolitano is a sock of Richard Reames: creator of the word Arborsculpture. For almost 20 years he has been promoting this word. His only claim to fame.

I’ve been watching and talking to Richard Reames and his team at Tree shaping talk. I’m end user of wikipedia and come to tree shaping to find out more about shaping trees. I’m now banned.


PaoloNapolitano was created during a discussion about whether or not the word Arborsculpture should be in the lead, of Tree Shaping article. He editing shows from the start he is an experienced editor.
Within days of starting he was trying to get some form of authority http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=416097671
And through out the rest of his editing he is clearly trying to build a platform of authority.
Just one example
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=418428969
All of Richards socks have edits that they can’t help but do on the Tree shaping and related articles. Message me for more details.


PaoloNapolitano shows his hand by attacking the word Pooktre which Richard sees as a rival to Arborsculpture.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arb...PaoloNapolitano
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=430974829
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Bla...rchive2#Pooktre
Please note how he talks to Blackash co-creator of the word Pooktre. PaoloNapolitano doesn’t talk to anyone else like this.

PaoloNapolitano is not a serial troll, it’s clearly just a rental portal for trolls.

Why is it so importation to Richard to have the title Arborsculpture on a wiki article about the whole art form?
It gives him immortality for ever, if an artform is named by him.
Build himself up and rip down anyone else who may be a rival.
He is the creator of the word arborsculpture and he uses it to name the whole art form that he himself is a very poor practitioner in. So he needs the authority of others’ work. How best to do that, go to the source of where media checks and make sure his word arborsculpture is the one.

Editors who are either socks or meats or paid advocates for Arborsculpture
Reames (self outed as Richard Reames)
Slowart (self outed as Reams) Slowart stated it seems it the most insanely persistent will win.
Martin Hobin (obsessive about changing the title to arborsculpture and chasing away or getting editors banned who disagree. )
Colincbn (smarter by still circles around the same issues)
Johnuniq (editor who comes in and helps Martin Hobin or Colincbn out of answering content questions by attacking the other editors behaviour)
Duff (edits on tree shaping and related articles and make massive changes unlike his editing style on any other topic and the way he talks is also unlike their comment in other areas)
Griseum (sock - the bad hand)

JohnChrysostom/ JohnChrysostom (newest sock who would have been the one proposing the new changes) who is now engaged on the tree shaping article.
PaoloNapolitano ( sock of Richards, was trying to become an admin would have supported John suggestion to changes.) Tree shaping is under sanctions

They all end up around the same issues. JohnChrysostom since editing tree shaping his whole editing style is changing.

If you want to catch him just talk to him in one of the many languages he is expert in. To answer he will probably use babel fish which ‘gives really bad translations.

Why would this editor create a new page called tree sculpture (no refs for this term) and then redirected to tree shaping. An uninvolved editor wouldn’t understand the significance.